1 / 75

CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an hour)

CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an hour). Shawn Dowling, PGY 0.9 or 1.9?. Epidemiology. Currently, over 500,000 Canadians have HF 50,000 new cases per year MC reason for A in those >65yoa Only CVS disease that is  in prevalence

fran
Télécharger la présentation

CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an hour)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CHF (aka 1 whole cardiology fellowship in an hour) Shawn Dowling, PGY 0.9 or 1.9?

  2. Epidemiology • Currently, over 500,000 Canadians have HF • 50,000 new cases per year • MC reason for A in those >65yoa • Only CVS disease that is  in prevalence • One year MR after Dx ranges from 25-40%, >50% at 5 years (Framingham Heart Study)

  3. Definitions • Congestive Heart Failure • State in which the heart, at normal filling pressures, is incapable of pumping a sufficient supply of blood to meet the body’s metabolic demands • Pulmonary Edema • is a condition associated with increased loss of fluid from the pulmonary capillaries into the pulmonary interstitium and alveoli • Cardiac vs non-cardiac (i.e. ASA, toxins, sepsis, ARDS, etc)

  4. Just a touch of Physiology • Cardiac Output = ? X $ • $ = _____ + ____ - _____ • BP = _____ x _____

  5. Just a touch of Physiology • Cardiac Output = HR X SV • SV = preload + contractility- afterload • BP = SVR x CO

  6. Preload: • Amt of stretch at ventricle before contraction • Determined by venous rtn and compliance • Heart has an optimal preload that allows for maximal output (fwd flow) • Either  venous rtn/EDV or  compliance shift increase preload and thus reduce optimal curve

  7. Contractility • Amt of force generated by myocardium for a given preload/afterload • Directly related to Ca++ • Certain factors  contr • Physiologic: O2, CO2, H+, ischemia • Rx: ß-blocker, anti-dysrhythmic, Ca-antagonists, barbituates, EtOH

  8. Afterload: • Mural tension on cardiac cells during ventricular contraction • Fx of SVR and cardiac chamber size

  9. Optimal Curve Contractility Heart Failure

  10. Pressures HP COP Pulmonary Vessels

  11. Putting it together… • In CHF:  in LVEDP   Pulm HP (usu >20)  transudation of fluids into the interstitium (exceeds the ability of the lymphatics to compensate)  pulmonary congestion  R heart failure from fluid overload  forward flow ( CO) and “systemic congestion”

  12. The prerequisite boring stuff… MALADAPTIVE over time!!!

  13. Compensatory Mechanisms •  CO/  in LVEDP triggers a number of compensatory mechanisms • Frank-Starling mechanisms ( stretch =  SV) • Myocardial Hypertrophy ( LVEDP to maximize F-S mechanisms) • Neurohormonal changes

  14. It’s actually quite simple If you just remember RAS/ neurohormonal fundamentals

  15. Goal is to  CO via Adrenergic NS ( HR,  cont,  PVR) RAAS activated via kidney hypoperfusion Neurohormonal Here you go! Mark, can you do the bilateral Posterior Shoulder dislocation trick again.

  16. CHF +++ CHF

  17. Adrenergic NS F-S mech’m Hypertrophy Compensatory mech’m

  18. ‘Nuff Physiology

  19. Types of HF • Systolic vs Diastolic • High-output vs Low-ouput • What is it? • RV –vs- LV –vs- Both (not going to talk about isolated RV- consult pulmonary)

  20. Systolic (2/3) (inadequate cont’n) Impaired contractility Impaired SV +/- EF Sx of  CO Diastolic (1/3) (inadequate relax’n)  LV compliance LV filling pressure Venous congestion Systolic vs Diastolic

  21. Impaired Contractility 1.MI 2.Chr volume overload -MR -AR 3. Dilated CM •  Afterload • 1. AS • 2. HTN Systolic Dysfx L-sided HF Diastolic Dysfx Impair’d Vent Relax’n 1.LVH 2.Hypertrophic CM 3.Restrictive CM Obst to LV Filling 1.MS 2.Pericardial Cons’n or tamponade

  22. Case 1 • 79 yo man • CC: Dyspnea – sats were 83% via EMS • PMHx: ??? • Meds: metoprolol, ramipril, nitrates (hasn’t used in mts), lasix (no  dose), advil, allopurinol, • Approach? Dx? Precipitant?

  23. Case 1 (cont) • ABC’s – IV, O2, monitored bed • Hx, P/E • Investigations? • Reversible causes - i.e. ??

  24. P/E • VS: 110/60, HR-90, RR-30, Sats –90% on NRB, afeb • JVP???, HS – present – too wheezy to hear clearly • Bibasilar crackles, peripheral edema

  25. Sx of CHF L sided Sx SOB, SOBOE PND(?), Orthopnea(?) Fatigue/confusion R sided Sx Peripheral edema RUQ pain ? pointing to etiology CP or angina equivalent Palpitations Change in Rx/new Rx Change in diet Blood loss Hx

  26. What we hear in the ER  HR(ANS),  RR Diaphoresis (ANS) Crackles / wheezes JVD (50% pts) Peripheral edema (1/3 pts) Hepatomegaly / HJR/Kussmaul’s sign (?) Peripheral Perfusion What the Cardiologists claim to find on p/e S3 (25%), +/- S4 Loud P2 Pulsus Alternans PMI laterally displaced P/E findings in…

  27. Investigations • Labs: CBC, lytes, Cr/BUN, trop, ?miracle test • ECG • CXR

  28. So you think it CHF… • What’s your DDx • Structural – think of the components of the heart (arteries, nerves, myocardium, valves, pericardium) • Iatrogenic (Rx (what drug for this guy), diet, fluids) • Incompliant with meds • Infection/Increased metabolic demand: H.O. HF • Increased Afterload

  29. The son arrives… • Dad has a Hx of COPD – longtime smoker, MI yrs ago • SO is it CHF OR COPD???? • Anyone know of a blood test that may help? • How should it be used?

  30. Brain Natriuretic Peptide

  31. BNP • Polypeptide that is synthesized in the ventricles in response to stretch/pressure prePro-BNP  Pro-BNP  BNP (active) t1/2 =20 min nt-BNP (inactive) t1/2 =120 min • Released in proportion to LV expansion reflecting the LVEDP • Will discuss later it’s physiologic role later

  32. What we do know • N BNP levels are affected by age, renal fx, drug use (bb & diuretics in particular) • Correlates with NYHA Class HF • Likely has a role in Screening, Dx, Tx, Px, • FP-?chronic CHF • R heart failure: PE, severe lung disease, chronic/stable CHF

  33. Should emergency physicians use B-type natriuretic peptide testing in patients with unexplained dyspnea? • CJEM review of 2 articles: NEJM 2002; 347: 161-167 Circulation 2002; 106:416-422

  34. Prospective diagnostic test evaluationinternational multicentre • 1586 pts, • CHF Dx made by two cardiologists (reviewed charts, blinded to BNP results)

  35. Treating MD’s*PTP (i.e., pre-BNP) of CHF • 46.9% fell into the 0%-20% probability group, • 27.9% fell into the 20%-80% (clinically uncertain) group, • 25.4% fell into the 80%-100% probability group • EP’s or Internists

  36. 675 346 110

  37. BNP study authors concluded that based on • That the rapid measurement of BNP, using a cut-off value of greater than 100 pg/cc, will improve clinicians' ability to differentiate CHF from non-cardiac dyspnea in the emergency department.

  38. Problem: • Most of the patients (1514/1586) were either in the CHF unlikely group (0-20% probability) or in the CHF likely group (80-100%) • Therefore the CJEM reviewers looked at indeterminate group

  39. By setting a binary cut-off of 100mcg Characteristics of the test are much lower than what was prev stated Therefore these results will not really help us Sensitivity – 79% (72–86) Specificity - 71% (66–76) PPV - 58% (51–65) NPV - 87% (83–91) LR+ -2.7 (2.2–3.3) LR– - 0.3 (0.2–0.4)

  40. Based on prior studies – BNP researchers looked at absolute values and tried to risk stratify based on these • PRIDE study looked at proBNP(ntBNP) • Retrospectively developed an Acute CHF score (not yet prospectively validated)

  41. Diagnostic Algorithm • ProBNP <300 = CHF unlikely (NPV = 99% - don’t mention Sens/Spec) • ProBNP>10,000 = CHF likely (PPV = 94% if prior Hx of CHF and 99% if no Hx CHF)

  42. Elevated proBNP (age cutoffs) – 4 pts • Interstitial edema on CXR – 2 pts • Orthopnea – 2 pts • Absence of fever – 2 pts • Current Loop Diuretic use – 1 pt • Age >75 - 1 pt • Rales on lung exam – 1 pt • Absence of a cough – 1 pt

  43. Score > 7 high predictive value of CHF • Sens 90%, Spec - 90%, PPV 83%

  44. RCT, ED setting • N=452 – BNP (225) or no BNP (227) • Told treating MD if <100 CHF unlikely, >500 CHF likely, 100-500 indeterminate • Endpoints • LOS and costs aka BASEL study

  45. BNP  Time to Tx  hospitalization, ICU admissions, LOS, costs

  46. CHR • ? Getting it, ? When • $$ • Likely getting proBNP (ntBNP) • Run on the same machine as trops therefore approx approx same wait

  47. BNP in Summary • Likely coming to the region • Ongoing research as to how to use it • Likely will be absolute cut-offs ( ie less than 300 no CHF, >10,000 CHF) • And some sort of scoring system/further investigations to assess those in the middle

  48. CHF w/N heart size? • Is this possible? • What’s your DDx? • Cardiac –v- non-cardiac • Acute • Chronic

More Related