1 / 37

Missouri algorithm: Design & objectives

Missouri algorithm: Design & objectives. Peter Scharf University of Missouri. Peter Scharf Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, Glenn Davis, John Lory, Vicky Hubbard, Kent Shannon, Harlan Palm. On the way here, I saw a lot of money laying on the ground!!. Missouri Algorithm: Objectives.

francesca-hoffman
Télécharger la présentation

Missouri algorithm: Design & objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Missouri algorithm:Design & objectives Peter Scharf University of Missouri Peter Scharf Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, Glenn Davis, John Lory, Vicky Hubbard, Kent Shannon, Harlan Palm

  2. On the way here, I saw a lot of money laying on the ground!!

  3. Missouri Algorithm: Objectives • Don’t leave money laying on the ground • Supply enough N to the crop to support full yield • Don’t apply N that the crop doesn’t need • Don’t let N escape from fields to water

  4. Crop N need is variable • Twenty on-farm N rate experiments in Missouri, corn after soybean, no manure • Most profitable N rates were 109, 114, 175, 0, 90, 190, 244, 63, 119, 300, 0, 146, 146, 180, 52, 175, 112, 149, 136, 114 lb N/acre

  5. Crop N need is variable: Missouri lb/ac

  6. Crop N need is variable: Minnesota

  7. N underapplied N overapplied Wasted $ Environmental risk Overapplication = leftover N in soil

  8. Mouth of Mississippi River Huge algal bloom

  9. Spatially intensive diagnosis is needed How?

  10. Diagnosing where to put more N

  11. Missouri algorithm design:Just an empirical relationship • John Lory and I: initial calibration with Cropscan • Newell Kitchen et al: more recent field-scale calibration of Greenseeker and Crop Circle • Multi-state (country) data from this group

  12. Missouri Algorithm: Objectives, Set 2 • Deal with spatial variability in N need • Support producer, retailers, consultants in planned sidedress operations from V6 to V16 • Support producer, retailers, consultants in rescue N applications when previously applied N has been lost

  13. Supporting producers in planned sidedress operations using sensors • 26 demo fields in 2007 ( ) • 61 demo fields 2004-2007 Nearly 30 demo fields 2008, including first cotton field

  14. Controller runs ball valve to change fertilizer rate Computer in cab reads sensors, calculates N rate, directs controller sensors Color sensors can be used for sidedressing anhydrous…

  15. …or sidedressing solution

  16. …or with a high-clearance spinner

  17. …with a big sprayer

  18. …or a big injector

  19. On-farm sensor demos 2004-2007

  20. On-farm sensor demos 2004-2007

  21. On-farm sensor demos 2004-2007

  22. On-farm sensor demos 2004-2007

  23. On-farm sensor demos 2004-2007

  24. Overall: +$13/ac to sensors On-farm sensor demos 2004-2007

  25. Sensor Benefits: • Make sure enough N is applied • Avoid unneeded N application

  26. N application to head-high corn N rate map June 20, 2007

  27. 129 bu/ac 149 bu/ac High-N reference area 115 175 175

  28. Sensor Benefits: • Make sure enough N is applied • Avoid unneeded N application

  29. August 1 Aerial Photo after the June 13 UAN Application

  30. Avg Bu/A 208.6 Fixed 214.1 208.0 208.5 206.6 206.6 211.6 205.4 Variable 215.4 212.1 204.2 212.4 215.5 204.9 206.6 210.2

  31. 2008: Our first cotton demo

  32. Questions?

More Related