1 / 19

Using Website Evaluation to Promote Higher-Order Thinking

Using Website Evaluation to Promote Higher-Order Thinking. Teri Schmidt Matt Rose K-12 Outreach Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security, Purdue University. “If it’s on the Internet, it must be true.”. Have you heard . . .?.

frazierh
Télécharger la présentation

Using Website Evaluation to Promote Higher-Order Thinking

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Using Website Evaluation to Promote Higher-Order Thinking Teri Schmidt Matt Rose K-12 Outreach Center for Education and Research in Information Assurance and Security, Purdue University

  2. “If it’s on the Internet, it must be true.”

  3. Have you heard . . .? • NutraSweet/Diet Coke (Aspartame) Causes Cancer:http://www.aspartame.org/aspartame_myths.html • Free Champagne: http://www.veuve-clicquot.fr/home_flash/alerte.htm • Pepsi Drops the Pledge of Allegiance:http://www.pepsiworld.com/help/false_rumor.php • Oliver North Warned of Osama Bin Laden: http://www.northamerican.com/benladen.htm “I heard this from ___ who’s a lawyer, so it’s true. . .”

  4. Today’s Agenda • Higher-Order Thinking Overview • Website Evaluation Overview • Lesson Plan Highlight/Demonstration • Debrief Lesson Plan

  5. Importance of Higher-Order Thinking Skills • Economic shift from traditional industrial base to information & service base • Tomorrow’s worker will have 3+ careers which are continually redefined by rapidly advancing technology • Decentralization of workplace authority • Politics, society, & mass (multi)media

  6. Higher-OrderThinking • Metacognition: Thinking about thinking while thinking • Subjective Reaction vs. Reasoning • Critical Literacy: • Comparison, classification, deductive reasoning, critiquing • Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning: • Knowledge, Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, Evaluation

  7. Higher-Order Thinking Outcomes

  8. 2. Website Evaluation • Why study Website evaluation? • Where & When should Website evaluation be studied? • Howshould Website evaluation be studied?

  9. Why evaluateWebsites? • Increased use of Internet in schools • Magazine rack analogy* • “Knowledge society” *Harris, R. (1997). Evaluating Internet research sources. Retrieved January 5, 2004 from http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm.

  10. Why evaluateWebsites? • Address student’s preconceptions about “how the world works” • Promote active learning by modeling & practicing metacognition, critical thinking, and transfer

  11. Where & when to evaluate?: • Before the students are allowed to search the Internet freely • Subjects in which research, investigation, or inquiry takes place • Reinforced in other subject areas

  12. How to evaluateWebsites? • Pre-evaluate • Look to evaluation of print media (Authority, Scope, Currency, Purpose, Accuracy) • Use an established rubric or checklist (i.e. the CARS Checklist by Robert Harris) • *Don’t forget to use common sense

  13. How:The CARS checklist • Credibility • Accuracy • Reasonableness • Support Harris, R. (1997). Evaluating Internet research sources. Retrieved Jamuary 5, 2004 from http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm

  14. 2. CARS:Credibility • Author’s credentials • “About the Author,” “Credits,” or Contact Information • Credentials relevant? http://pubweb.acns.nwu.edu/~abutz/di/intro.html • Sponsoring organization • “About us,” “Mission” • URL (see handout) • Website Design: Professional?

  15. 2. CARS:Accuracy • Timeliness/Currency • page creation and revision dates (if applicable) • Audience and Purpose • sponsoring organization and owner of domain • URL • Completeness • presentation of opposing viewpoints • Links to other sites • A HELPFUL TOOL: http://www.alltheweb.com

  16. 2. CARS:Reasonableness • Unbiased tone http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/special_initiatives/games/joecool_joefool/jo_cool_teachers.cfm • Absence of broad unsupported statements • Consistent with knowledge gained from other sources

  17. CARS:Support • Source documentation • Corroboration http://147.129.226.1/library/research/AIDSFACTS.htm

  18. Lesson PlanDemonstration Now it’s your turn! http://www.beefnutrition.org/ Some resources for your classroom: • http://muse.widener.edu/Wolfgram-Memorial-Library/webevaluation/examples.htm • http://libweb.sonoma.edu/assistance/eval • http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/EvaluateWhy.html

  19. 4. Debrief/Questions Thank you! Teri Schmidt tmschmid@cerias.purdue.edu (765) 496-7707 Matt Rose mrose@cerias.purdue.edu (765) 496-7710 http://cerias.purdue.edu/education/k-12/

More Related