1 / 6

draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-03

draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-03. D. A. Bryan , P. Matthews, E. Shim, D. Willis and S. Dawkins IETF-79, Beijing China, November 12, 2010 . Update on Concepts. As RELOAD was adopted as the direction for the protocol, WG directed authors of Concepts to:

fred
Télécharger la présentation

draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-03

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. draft-ietf-p2psip-concepts-03 D. A. Bryan, P. Matthews, E. Shim, D. Willis and S. Dawkins IETF-79, Beijing China, November 12, 2010

  2. Update on Concepts • As RELOAD was adopted as the direction for the protocol, WG directed authors of Concepts to: • When RELOAD stabilized, update to reflect decisions made by WG • Update / interface with RELOAD authors to ensure that terminology was consistent • Now that RELOAD has gone to WGLC, authors have iterated concepts with goal of meeting the goals above and moving concepts to WGLC shortly

  3. Major Changes • Updated to reflect RELOAD design decisions and architecture • VERY much would appreciate a good read to ensure we made all the required updates! • Removed much of the “history” information about why we reached the decisions we did • This is discussed as an open issue in the next slides

  4. Open Issue #1 • Should we include information about historical decisions? • Reasons For: Helps eliminate people coming later and asking why we reached the decisions we did. Documents in one place the motivations behind the current design • Reasons Against: Increases the bulk of the document. The debates can be controversial, so accurately capturing it can be hard. Mailing list archive captures this process already. • Proposal: Has been removed in the current version, and we propose leaving it out. • Alternate: Add as an appendix?

  5. Open Issue #2 • Do we include the scenarios from draft-bryan-p2psip-app-scenarios-00 (now expired) • While never included in a previous revision, but there was occasional WG discussion to include them • Would need to be significantly revisited and cleaned up to reflect subsequent WG consensus • Reasons Against: Increases the bulk of the document. Needed early, but most are now obvious and well understood. • Reasons For: Documents application scenarios. Not captured elsewhere. • Proposal: Do not include at all. • Alternate: Include as an appendix in draft.

  6. Next Steps • Editors plan to revise to reflect the decisions on these WG items, and ask to move to WGLC • Would very much like reviewers, particularly to ensure that we captured all the changes required to have the draft agree with the decisions made in RELOAD

More Related