490 likes | 621 Vues
This document discusses the implications of policy and practice in the implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS). It highlights the essential policy considerations, evidence base, and the feedback loops that inform the practice. Through examples, it emphasizes the importance of integrating initiatives to create a culture that fosters positive behavior and academic success in schools. Additionally, it reviews frameworks for responsiveness to intervention, early intervening services, and the role of data systems in maintaining effective behavioral practices.
E N D
Advancing SWPBS in Policy & Practice George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut July 14, 2009 www.pbis.org www.cber.org www.scalingup.org www.swis.org George.sugai@uconn.edu
PURPOSE Consider policy & practice implications & SWPBS implementation • Policy considerations • Practice considerations • SWPBS evidence-base • SWPBS & School Psychology
Set-up Sr+ Gina Carlton, Patti Harrison, Stacy Skalsky, NASP membership Disclaimer - Not Sch Psych or Policy Person…..Teacher/Researcher • Policy enables practice • Practice informs policy Handouts & “ppts” = www.pbis.org
Policy Practice Feedback Loops Policy Structure Procedure Practice Policy (Plan) Policy Enabled Practices (PEP) Practice Informed Policy (PIP) Practice (Do) Fixsen et al. (2005) NIRN. www.scalingup.org
3+ Policy & Practice Examples & Considerations Richard’s MESSAGE Context/culture matters
HR 2597 May 21, 2009“Positive Behavior for Safe & Effective Schools” • ESEA funds for SWPBS • Provisions • Professional development • Safe & Drug Free Communities • Early intervening services & counseling programs • Office of specialized instructional supports
American Recovery & Reinvestment ActIDEA & Title Recovery Funds • Data systems • E.g., SWIS • SWPBS implementation, e.g., • Early Intervening Services IDEA • School-wide Programs (ESEA Title I) • Professional Development (ESEA Title II)
24 K Response to Intervention Framework RtI
Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • High Intensity • Intensive, Individual Interventions • Individual Students • Assessment-based • Intense, durable procedures • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Targeted Group Interventions • Some students (at-risk) • High efficiency • Rapid response • Universal Interventions • All students • Preventive, proactive • Universal Interventions • All settings, all students • Preventive, proactive Responsiveness to Intervention Academic Systems Behavioral Systems 1-5% 1-5% 5-10% 5-10% 80-90% 80-90% Circa 1996
Responsiveness to InterventionAcademic+ Social Behavior MESSAGE Integrate/braid initiatives
Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior CONTINUUM OF SCHOOL-WIDE INSTRUCTIONAL & POSITIVE BEHAVIOR SUPPORT FEW ~5% Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior ~15% SOME Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings 23 ALL ~80% of Students
23 RTI Continuum of Support for ALL Few Some All MESSAGE Label behavior…not people Dec 7, 2007
MESSAGE Something effective for most
SWPBS Big Ideas
2 SWPBS is framework for….
SWPBS Approach for operationalizing best practice Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement OUTCOMES 15 Supporting Decision Making Supporting Staff Behavior DATA SYSTEMS PRACTICES MESSAGE Support Implementers Supporting Student Behavior
VIOLENCE PREVENTION • Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence (2001) • Coordinated Social Emotional & Learning (Greenberg et al., 2003) • Center for Study & Prevention of Violence (2006) • White House Conference on School Violence (2006) • Positive, predictable school-wide climate • High rates of academic & social success • Formal social skills instruction • Positive active supervision & reinforcement • Positive adult role models • Multi-component, multi-year school-family-community effort
Effective Academic Instruction Effective Behavioral Interventions POSITIVE, PREVENTIVE SCHOOL CULTURE (SWPBS) = Continuous & Efficient Data-based Decision Making Systems for Durable & Accurate Implementation
ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS • TERTIARY PREVENTION • Function-based support • Wraparound • Person-centered planning • TERTIARY PREVENTION ~5% ~15% • SECONDARY PREVENTION • Check in/out • Targeted social skills instruction • Peer-based supports • Social skills club • SECONDARY PREVENTION • PRIMARY PREVENTION • Teach SW expectations • Proactive SW discipline • Positive reinforcement • Effective instruction • Parent engagement • PRIMARY PREVENTION MESSAGE Logically linked interventions ~80% of Students
17 SWPBS Practices School-wide Classroom • Smallest # • Evidence-based • Biggest, durable effect Family Non-classroom Student MESSAGE Efficiency, effectiveness, relevance
18 School-wide • Leadership team • Behavior purpose statement • Set of positive expectations & behaviors • Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior • Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior • Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations • Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation
Non-classroom • Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged • Active supervision by all staff • Scan, move, interact • Precorrections & reminders • Positive reinforcement
MESSAGE Train in context
Classroom • All school-wide • Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment • Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. • Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidence-based instructional curriculum & practices • Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior, including contingent & specific praise, group contingencies, behavior contracts, token economies • Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior, including specific, contingent, brief corrections for academic & social behavior errors, differential reinforcement of other behavior, planned ignoring, response cost, & timeout.
Individual Student • Behavioral competence at school & district levels • Function-based behavior support planning • Team- & data-based decision making • Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes • Targeted social skills & self-management instruction • Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations
Family • Continuum of positive behavior support for all families • Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements • Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner • Access to system of integrated school & community resources
Team GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS • Readiness agreements, prioritization, & investments • 3-4 year implementation commitment • Local capacity for training, coordination, coaching, & evaluation • Systems for implementation integrity Agreements Data-based Action Plan Evaluation Implementation MESSAGE Build local implementation capacities
Team-led Process MESSAGE Do “it” with others.
Sample Teaming Matrix Are outcomes measurable? MESSAGE Make decisions for working smarter
DEFINE Simply ADJUST for Efficiency MONITOR & ACKNOWLEDGE Continuously MODEL PRACTICE In Setting Teaching Academics & Behaviors MESSAGE Behavior is a behavior.
58 2. NATURAL CONTEXT 1. SOCIAL SKILL Expectations 3. BEHAVIOR EXAMPLES MESSAGE Defendable & efficient
1. SOCIAL SKILL 2. NATURAL CONTEXT 3. BEHAVIOR EXAMPLES
1. SOCIAL SKILL 2. NATURAL CONTEXT Expectations 3. BEHAVIOR EXAMPLES
www.pbis.org Horner, R., & Sugai, G. (2008). Is school-wide positive behavior support an evidence-based practice? OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support. www.pbis.org click “Research” “Evidence Base” MESSAGE Know your evidentiary support
90-School StudyHorner et al., in press • Schools that receive technical assistance from typical support personnel implement SWPBS with fidelity • Fidelity SWPBS is associated with • Low levels of ODR • .29/100/day v. national mean .34 • Improved perception of safety of the school • reduced risk factor • Increased proportion of 3rd graders who meet state reading standard.
Project Target: Preliminary FindingsBradshaw & Leaf, in press • PBIS (21 v. 16) schools reached & sustained high fidelity • PBIS increased all aspects of organizational health • Positive effects/trends for student outcomes • Fewer students with 1 or more ODRs (majors + minors) • Fewer ODRs (majors + minors) • Fewer ODRs for truancy • Fewer suspensions • Increasing trend in % of students scoring in advanced & proficient range of state achievement test
PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active & Integrated Coordination Training Evaluation Coaching Local School Teams/Demonstrations www.pbis.org “PBS Implementation Blueprint”
SUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE RESULTS THROUGH CONTINUOUS REGENERATION Continuous Self-Assessment Relevance Priority Efficacy Fidelity Valued Outcomes Effective Practices Practice Implementation Local Implementation Capacity
Effective Social & AcademicSchool Culture Common Language SWPBS Common Experience Common Vision/Values