1 / 21

Author: Vanishree Herlekar Co-Authors: Christopher Kost Jamie Osborne

The People’s Way: Assessing the Janmarg BRT for inclusive design. Author: Vanishree Herlekar Co-Authors: Christopher Kost Jamie Osborne. Transed 2012 Presentation by: Pranjali Deshpande - Agashe 18 September 2012. Ahmedabad -BEFORE. Ahmedabad public transport status quo.

frisco
Télécharger la présentation

Author: Vanishree Herlekar Co-Authors: Christopher Kost Jamie Osborne

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The People’s Way: Assessing the Janmarg BRT for inclusive design Author: VanishreeHerlekar Co-Authors: Christopher Kost Jamie Osborne Transed 2012 Presentation by: PranjaliDeshpande- Agashe 18 September 2012

  2. Ahmedabad-BEFORE Ahmedabad public transport status quo

  3. Ahmedabad-BEFORE

  4. Today…. “Janmarg”- People’s Way

  5. TODAY

  6. TODAY

  7. Janmarg phase II

  8. Key accessibility features of Janmarg • Level Boarding • At grade crossings • Trained drivers • Enclosed, well lit stations with seating • Access Ramps (1:12 gradient) • Tactile warnings at boarding gates • Map and route information in English and Gujarati • Auditory and visual announcements in stations and buses

  9. Components of accessibility Access routes from surrounding area Station/bus interface Vehicle interior

  10. ITDP’s study • ‘Janmarg’ has access features • “Are they being used?” • By whom? • Are they helpful? • How to improve?

  11. Methodology • Questionnaire survey to members of disabled community (n=27*) • questions on travel behavior, preferred mode, and experiences on public transport • User count at 5 Janmarg stations (appx 500/station) • visual observation of the number of seniors, visually impaired, mobility impaired, and hearing impaired passengers • Infrastructure audit (100m radius) • Bus interior (2 types of buses in the Janmarg system) • Stations and station precincts

  12. User groups • Senior citizens • Persons with impaired mobility • Persons with impaired vision • Persons with impaired hearing

  13. Questionnaire results • 51% had used public transport (past 6 months) • 100% prefer Janmarg over AMTS • Common issues in using public transport: • “Route to the bus stop/station is unsafe” • “The buses are too full” • “No space to sit or rest” • “Buses do not stop at bus stops”

  14. User count results *

  15. Station precinct audit Encroachments Lack of awareness .. .. 100m Parking Poor implementation … … Maintenance Maintenance Maintenance

  16. Methodology review… User group identification Questionnaire surveys User counts Infrastructure audits

  17. Station design: what’s working Access ramps (1:12 gradient) At-grade crossings

  18. Station design: what’s working Level boarding: average gap width of 10-12 cm Enclosed stations with seating and visual announcements

  19. Station design: issues Close placement of bollards at pedestrian crosssings Position of light posts on access rampsand walkways

  20. Conclusion • Access to the station • Participatory approach • Active disabled user testing while implementing • High construction quality = Minimum future maintenance • Coordination between different planning, implementation and maintenance bodies

  21. Thank you www.itdp.org www.twitter.com/itdpindia www.facebook.com/itdpindia

More Related