1 / 14

Cluster states around 16 O studied with the shell model

Cluster states around 16 O studied with the shell model. Yutaka Utsuno Advanced Science Research Center, Japan Atomic energy Agency ―Collaborator― S. Chiba (JAEA). Introduction. Excited states around 16 O Plenty of a -cluster or multiparticle-multihole states

frye
Télécharger la présentation

Cluster states around 16 O studied with the shell model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cluster states around 16O studied with the shell model Yutaka Utsuno Advanced Science Research Center, Japan Atomic energy Agency ―Collaborator― S. Chiba (JAEA)

  2. Introduction • Excited states around 16O • Plenty of a-cluster or multiparticle-multihole states • Famous example: 0+2 of 16O located at 6.05 MeV • Associated with a rotational band (cf. a-gas state) • Still very difficult to describe with ab initio calculations • Still difficult to describe with microscopic models

  3. Previous shell-model studies • Haxton and Johnson (HJ) • Up to full 4hw states • Shell gap is determined so as to reproduce the intruder states. • Warburton, Brown and Millener (WBM) • Model space similar to HJ • WBT interaction • In order to reproduce the intruder states, the N=Z=8 shell gap must be narrowed by ~3 MeV from that of the original interaction. • Can this be justified? → Scope of the present work • Effect of 6hw and more? 16O 6hw? W.C. Haxton and C. Johnson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1325 (1990).

  4. Effect of configurations beyond 4p-4h • Configurations beyond 4p-4h does not account for the lowering. Any other effect? 0+ of 16O with PSDWBT (in full p-sd shell) Only ~1 MeV

  5. Single-particle energy vs. observables • Usual procedure (Koopmans theorem): SPEs are identified with the energies of the “single-particle states” for 17O and “single-hole states” of 15O measured from the 16O energy. • Correct in the independent-particle limit • N=Z=8 gap: Sn(16O)-Sn(17O) • Correlation energy may change Sn’s but not always does: if the gain in the correlation energy is common, it is cancelled in the expression of separation energy. Sn(17O) Sn(16O) Taken from A. Bohr and B.R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure vol. 1

  6. Cross-shell correlation energy • Cross-shell correlation energy: the energy gained by incorporating the p to sd shell excitation • the same as the usual correlation energy in 15,16,17O • Peaked at 16O: 9.4 MeV for 16O, 8.4 MeV for 17O, and for 7.2 MeV 15O • The 1/2- in 15O has an especially small correlation energy. • The “experimental shell gap” Sn(16O)-Sn(17O)increases by 3.2 MeV. • Need for renormalization of SPE

  7. What makes the corr. energy of 16O largest? Component of the wave function (%) PSDWBT interaction 16O 17O sd sd blocked orbit p1/2 p1/2 p3/2 p3/2

  8. Renormalization of SPE • Energies of 17O(5/2+, 1/2+, 3/2+), 15O(1/2-, 3/2-), 20Ne(0+) and 12C(0+) relative to 16O(0+) are fitted to experiment including correlation energy. • Seven parameters, SPE’s and overall two-body strengths of p-shell and sd-shell int., are adjusted. • A much narrower gap is obtained.

  9. Systematics of the 0+ states • Comparison with the calculation • No excitation across the N=Z=8 gap • Full p-sd calc. with the original gap • Full p-sd calc. with the reduced gap so as to reproduce the separation energy including correlation • Missing states are reproduced.

  10. Breaking of the closure • Probability of the closure in the ground state of 16O: only45% • decreased from PSDWBT value 66% due to the narrower shell gap • Is this reasonable? • M1 excitation: a good observable to probe the closed shell • No M1 excitations are allowed if 16O were a complete closure. • 0p-0h state and 2p-2h cannot be connected with a one-body operator. The calculation also predicts that there are many unobserved 1+ states. Exp.) K.A. Snover et al., Phys. Rev. C 27, 1837 (1983).

  11. The case of a j-j closure 56Ni • Correlation energy is the smallest at the core. • Difference from the L-S closure: parity • Odd-particle excitation is allowed. • Deformation (in 52Fe)

  12. Summary • Cluster (or multiparticle-multihole) states around 16O are investigated with the full p-sd shell-model calculation. • Correlation energy is peaked at 16O, which works to decrease the bare shell gap from the “observed” shell gap. • As a result, excited states are pulled down to a right position. • Large core breaking associated with the narrow gap is supported by strong M1 excitations from the ground state. • Perspectives: 40Ca • impossible to perform a conventional shell-model calculation with a 1015 m-scheme dimension • use of the Monte Carlo shell model: see Shimizu’s seminar tomorrow for recent progress

  13. Selected levels of 16O • Rotational band (positive parity) and 1p-1h are well reproduced. Exp. Calc.

  14. Energy levels of 17O 5p-4h state Calc. Exp.

More Related