250 likes | 1.3k Vues
Explore language inequality and diversity, genetic and areal grouping of languages, and the influences of language contact. Uncover the complexities of language classification and the impact of borrowing linguistic features.
E N D
Language inequality • 5.6 percent of languages (398 languages)are spoken as L1 by 94.36845 percent of the world’s population. • 48.5 percent of the world’s population speaks 8 languages. • Chinese > Spanish> English > Arabic>Hindi > Portuguese > Bengali > Russian • 24.8 percent of languages are spoken by less than 1000 people. (Ethnologue)
Language inequality • Only about 1/3 of languages are written. • Some languages are described better than others. • Some languages supersede others. • NB: The same is true for other levels; cf. the dialect inequality.
Language inequality The theories of Language rely on specific languages: Their conclusions are based on languages … which are more accessible, which are described better, which are more understandable, which are most prominent, which are still alive. • Are these conclusions fully justified?
How many languages are there in the world? • Genetic grouping • Areal grouping • Typological grouping • About 7 thousand. Grouping languages together
Some important notions • Isogloss – the geographical boundary of a linguistic feature, or a feature itself discussed in the context of its geographical distribution. • Convergence – the process whereby lects get more common features, usually as a result of language contact. • Metatypy – change in morphosyntactic type and grammatical organisation which a language undergoes as a result of its speakers’ bilingualism in another language • Divergence – the process whereby lects diverge from each other.
Genetic grouping Family tree model • The languages are grouped together if they have a common ancestor. • NB: Terminology problem • family, branch, group, sub-… • macro-family, stock, phylum
Genetic grouping • Subgrouping… • on the basis of shared innovations – innovation-based method • Problems: residual groups, whose members do not share any common features differentiating them from other groups, potential rise of the same innovation in unrelated groups. • on the basis of common “basic vocabulary” – distance-based method • “basic vocabulary” – the list of the most stable words which are (believed to be) less likely to be replaced with noncognate words • grouping together on the basis of larger similarities in basic vocabulary
Genetic grouping • The tree model works better in the case of more isolated lects. • However, quite often innovations show more complex distribution. Lects: A B C D Innovations: a,b a,b,c b,c c
Genetic grouping Wave model • originally, an alternative to the Tree Model, yet is often used to complement the latter • Innovations spread from central or focal areas to other areas (transitional areas). • (Central areas are not arbitrary.) • Different innovations may have different central areas.
Genetic grouping Wave Model Innovations: a,ba,b,cb,c c
Areal grouping • Linguistic area – at a first approximation, the geographical context of a language
From languages to areas • Similarities between geographically close languages which can be explained neither by genetic relations nor by typological laws. • Possible explanations: • common substrate language; • language contact
What determines contact influence? • the duration of the contact • the size of the contacting populations • the economic domination of one group by another group • the cultural domination and influence • religious influence • ... • Normally, the language contact is asymmetric and is related to the domination of one language by another language.
What is borrowed? • Everything, but… • Unmarked features are borrowed more easily than marked features. • The phenomena which are more integrated in morphosyntax are borrowed less easily than the phenomena which are less integrated in morphosyntax. • Typologically more appropriate structures are borrowed more easily (alternatively, borrowed structures may be reanalysed as typologically appropriate).
From languages to areas • Language area / Sprachbund (after Н.С. Трубецкой) - a group of languages characterized by a considerable number of common features resulted from language contact. • Balkan linguistic area (Bulgarian, Serbo-Croatian?, Makedonian, Greek, Albanian, Romanian, Turkish?): postposed article, poor morphological system, the lack of infinitive, future tense based on an auxiliary / particle originally meaning ‘will, want’,evidentiality, objects doubled with pronominal clitics, WHERE(ESS) = WHERE(LAT), etc.
Some problems for sprachbunds: • Language contacts may be different • Languages which are closely related genetically may also show contact-induced common features, which are, however, hardly distinguishable from shared innovations. • Isoglosses may cover different languages even within a single linguistic area. • The boundaries of a linguistic area may be not that clear-cut. • Contacts are not always based on geography.
From areas to languages • Languages of the world are distributed unevenly. 2008
From areas to languages • Geographical zones differ in their language density. • Language density:the number of languages per n speakers or n km2. • Geographical zones differ in their genetic density. • Genetic density: the number of different language groups per n speakers or n km2. • What determines the linguistic characteristics of a geographical zone? – J. Nichols
From areas to languages • Language density correlates, for example: • with the landscape Natural barriers increase language density (mountains, islands). Their absence decreases language density (steppe, coastal areas). • with the latitude and climate Language density increases closer to the equator. • with the lifestyle Nomadism decreases language density. Fishery increases language density. • with marriage constraints Endogamy increases language density