1 / 14

P rogress of Roadmap Action 1

Jacek Zaucha University of Gdańsk, Institute for Development Dariusz Swiątek Polish Academy of Science Kinga Stańczuk-Olejnik&Magda Zagrzejewska Polish Ministry of Regional Development Structural Policy Coordination Department. P rogress of Roadmap Action 1 .

gaetano
Télécharger la présentation

P rogress of Roadmap Action 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Jacek Zaucha University of Gdańsk, Institute for Development Dariusz Swiątek Polish Academy of Science Kinga Stańczuk-Olejnik&Magda Zagrzejewska Polish Ministry of Regional DevelopmentStructural Policy Coordination Department Progress of RoadmapAction 1 ESPON Seminar, Paphos 5-6December2012

  2. Roadmap towards promoting and enhancing an integrated, territorial approach based on the TA 2020 accepted by the Ministers The origins for the NTCCP survey Action 1: • Stage 1 – preparation of a survey on how Members States integrate place-based approach into public policies on national, regional and local level. • Stage 2 – develop a methodology on how to integrate the place-based approach into public policies on national, regional and local level. • Stage 3 – dissemination of the methodology and results of the survey as good practice throughout exchange of best practices, workshops, conferences, publications.

  3. The rationale for the survey • To heat up European debate on the territorial • approach to development. To integrate economy and space. • To show added value of such approach in different policies • To convince the others that territory matters for development policies we have to show that we make use of the place-based approach in our countries. Regional/local National Paphos ESPON Seminar 5-6th December 2012

  4. Main ingridients of the place-based • Capable Institutions for development of individual places and all places in harmony • Knowledge on the overall developmental context (of all places) This is only an example. Many other configurations are possible e.g. regional versus local • Knowledge on individual development context(territorial capital, other type of local/regional potential etc.), • Impact assessments of different policies, • Institutional frame for multilevel governance dialogue including instruments, • Dialogue between different developmental agents/institutions .

  5. Preliminary findings (26 countries) 1. All the necessary ingredients of the place based approach are in place. Knowledge on territorially differentiated socio economic development has been collected in almost all countries although using different methods and techniques

  6. Preliminary findings (26 countries) 2. Main reasons of success • Strong culture of public debate • Active and capable local/regional governments and stakeholders • Territorial impacts of national policies by local stakeholders

  7. Preliminary findings (26 countries) 3. There is no uniform template of the Place Based approach. Countries’ approaches differ. There is no clear proof for correlation between number of types of actors engaged in dialogue and size/type of the country small countries federal countries large countries

  8. Preliminary findings (26 countries) • Territory is an important topic for cross-governance dialogue within the place-based frame % • Key subtopics: • Strong cities >60% • Functional regions>70% • Accessibility and transport>80% • Public services of general interest>65% • Rural regions>75% • Problem regions>78% • Environment and nature > 70%

  9. Preliminary findings (26 countries) 5. Some elements of the Place Based approach needs strengthening 50% of countries are not satisfied with the current state of the cross-governance dialogue

  10. Preliminary findings (26 countries) 5. Some elements of the Place Based approach needs strengthening Only in 57% of our countries local governments are able to asses the impact of upper level policies and formulate expectations on them Number of countries

  11. Preliminary findings (26 countries) 5. Some elements of the Place Based approach needs strengthening Number of countries where instruments were used We should focus on impact assessments, and planning in line with functional geography

  12. Preliminary findings (26 countries) 5. Some elements of the Place Based approach needs strengthening Knowledge on territorial development is collected by national authorities mainly from statistical sources, permanent monitoring systems are less popular. Is this evidence based dialogue?

  13. Preliminary findings (26 countries) 6. There is a need to focus our efforts on implementation of the Place Based approach on some policies Functional Geography SGEI

  14. Thank you for your attention!

More Related