1 / 34

Evaluation of Spatial Repellents Under Semi-field and Field Conditions

Evaluation of Spatial Repellents Under Semi-field and Field Conditions. Daniel L. Kline USDA-ARS, CMAVE Gainesville, FL d an.kline@ars.usda.gov. Spatial (area) repellents.

galya
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluation of Spatial Repellents Under Semi-field and Field Conditions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation of Spatial Repellents Under Semi-field and Field Conditions Daniel L. Kline USDA-ARS, CMAVE Gainesville, FL dan.kline@ars.usda.gov

  2. Spatial (area) repellents Spatial (or area) repellent products are intended to significantly reduce the number of mosquitoes (and potentially other biting flies) in a defined area over a designated period of time.

  3. Military Objectives • Protect Individual Soldier • Sentry duty • Special Operations • Protect Community of Soldiers • Tent • Whole Encampment

  4. Effects On Target Species • Mortality • True Repellency • Expellency

  5. Commercial Products Tested---2009 • Hot Shot No Pest Strip---2,2- dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate 18.6% • SC Johnson’s Clip-On---metofluthrin 31.2% • ThermaCell---d-cis/allethrin 21.97%

  6. Semi-field Tests

  7. Mortality Effects 8 ft 8 ft 4 ft 4 ft 2 ft 4 ft 2 ft

  8. Hot Shot with 2,2-diclorovinyldimethylphosphate 18.6% Aedesaegypti N 76-100% 51-75% 26-50% 0-25% S (Open end) Top position – 3 (1’ from the ceiling) Mortality rate Middle position – 2 (3.3’ from the floor) Bottom position – 1 (1’ from the floor)

  9. Hot Shot with 2,2-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate 18.6% Aedestaeniorhynchus S 76-100% 51-75% 26-50% 0-25% N (Open end) Top position – 3 (1’ from the ceiling) Mortality rate Middle position – 2 (3.3’ from the floor) Bottom position – 1 (1’ from the floor)

  10. Hot Shot with 2,2-diclorovinyl dimethyl phosphate 18.6% Stomoxyscalcitrans N 76-100% 51-75% 26-50% 0-25% S (Open end) Top position – 3 (1’ from the ceiling) Mortality rate Middle position – 2 (3.3’ from the floor) Bottom position – 1 (1’ from the floor)

  11. N 76-100% 51-75% 26-50% 0-25% Off Clip-On with metofluthrin 31.2% Aedesaegypti S (Open end) Top position – 3 (1’ from the ceiling) Mortality rate Middle position – 2 (3.3’ from the floor) Bottom position – 1 (1’ from the floor)

  12. N 76-100% 51-75% 26-50% 0-25% Off Clip-On with metofluthrin 31.2% Aedestaeniorhynchus S (Open end) Top position – 3 (1’ from the ceiling) Mortality rate Middle position – 2 (3.3’ from the floor) Bottom position – 1 (1’ from the floor)

  13. N 76-100% 51-75% 26-50% 0-25% Off Clip-On with metofluthrin 31.2% Stomoxyscalcitrans S (Open end) Top position – 3 (1’ from the ceiling) Mortality rate Middle position – 2 (3.3’ from the floor) Bottom position – 1 (1’ from the floor)

  14. N 76-100% 51-75% 26-50% 0-25% ThermaCell with d-cis/allethrin 21.97% Ae. aegypti S (Open end) Top position – 3 (1’ from the ceiling) Mortality rate Middle position – 2 (3.3’ from the floor) Bottom position – 1 (1’ from the floor)

  15. N 76-100% 51-75% 26-50% 0-25% ThermaCell with d-cis/allethrin 21.97% Aedestaeniorhynchus S (Open end) Top position – 3 (1’ from the ceiling) Mortality rate Middle position – 2 (3.3’ from the floor) Bottom position – 1 (1’ from the floor)

  16. N 76-100% 51-75% 26-50% 0-25% ThermaCell with d-cis/allethrin 21.97% Stomoxyscalcitrans S (Open end) Top position – 3 (1’ from the ceiling) Mortality rate Middle position – 2 (3.3’ from the floor) Bottom position – 1 (1’ from the floor)

  17. Repellency Effects

  18. Mosquitoes Released Into Each Cage Ochlerotatustaeniorhynchus (500) Aedesaegypti (500) Flies Released Into Each Cage Stomoxys calcitrans (500)

  19. Arkansas Field Studies

  20. Arkansas Field Studies • 13 trap nights • Five species captured • Psorophoracolumbiae • Anophelesquadrimaculatus • Culexerraticus • Culexsalinarius • Aedesvexans

  21. Arkansas Field Studies • None of the candidate spatial repellents prevented mosquitoes from finding the traps. • Traps equipped with ThermaCELL captured significantly fewer mosquitoes.

  22. What’s Next: Additional Compounds • Linalool • Geraniol • DEET • TL-I-73 transfluthrin analogue • 1% prallethrin • 1-Methylpiperazine • 1-Ethylpiperazine • 1-Methylpyrrolidine • Kamal’s compounds

  23. What’s Next: Delivery Systems

  24. What’s Next: • Attract and Kill Technologies • Spatial repellents and artificial barrier treatments against Anopheles mosquitoes under field conditions

  25. Collaborators • Ulrich Bernier • Jerome Hogsette • KamalChauhan • James Dunsford • Todd Walker • David Dame • Max Meisch

  26. Acknowledgements • Special thanks to Joyce Urban who did all the hard work • Jolene Malicoate for rearing Aedesaegypti • Haze Brown for rearing Aedestaeniorhynchus • Heather Furlong for rearing Stomoxyscalcitrans

More Related