1 / 14

ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICS EGN 4034

ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICS EGN 4034. FALL TERM 2008 DR. G.HASKINS Chapter 2. ENGINEERING RESPONSIBILITY. Seriousness of responsibility comes with expertise Public trust in reliable performance Opportunity for unscrupulous to fall short of the mark

gamada
Télécharger la présentation

ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICS EGN 4034

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICSEGN 4034 FALL TERM 2008 DR. G.HASKINS Chapter 2

  2. ENGINEERING RESPONSIBILITY • Seriousness of responsibility comes with expertise • Public trust in reliable performance • Opportunity for unscrupulous to fall short of the mark • Commit to level of excellence

  3. ENGINEERING STANDARDS • NSPE code • Work conform to “applicable engineering standards” • Judgment, not only algorithms • Obligation-responsibility • Benefit clients & public • Do not violate trust • Forward looking responsibility

  4. STANDARD OF CARE • Unexpected problems may make “engineering standards” and SOP insufficient • Then, must follow more demanding norm, standard of care

  5. STANDARD OF CAREAND LEGAL LIABILITY • Some level of error is acceptable • Some point it is not • Dividing line is “standard of care” • Expert opinion • Compare actions to other competent engineers providing similar service in same locale

  6. HYATT REGENCY CASE #17 • Walkway collapse • Project engineer, and chief engineer, did not authorize departure from original design • Failed to monitor employees • “…conscious indifference to professional duties… • Did not meet SOC • Held liable

  7. CITICORP CENTER CASE #6 • Innovative design • Original spec for welds on diagonals was not followed • Bolted instead • Still complied with NYC building codes • Considered only 90° winds, not quartering

  8. CITICORP (CONT) • Calculation of “bolt vs weld” indicated unacceptable vulnerability to wind • Engineer worked up plan for rectification • Citicorp agreed despite additional cost • Insurance rates decreased • Disaster averted

  9. CITICORP (cont) • Building codes: general in nature • Unlikely to predict relevant effects of innovations

  10. COLUMBIA DISASTER • Physical cause – dislodged insulating foam • Organizational cause – NASA culture • Values, norms, beliefs & practices of an organization • Organizational responsibility? • Artificial person • Escape individual responsibility • Indiv and corps both held liable

  11. LEGAL LIABILITY FOR HARM • Intentional harm • Gross negligence (reckless harm) • Put others at known risk • Negligence • Legal obligation /standard of care • Failure to conform • Proximate cause • Damage

  12. LEGAL LIABILITY (cont.) • Strict liability • Inherently dangerous instrumentality • West v Caterpillar Tractor Co. • Strict liability in Florida

  13. IMPEDIMENTS TO RESPONSIBLE ACTION • Groupthink • Illusion of invulnerability of group to failure • Outsiders as adversaries • Responsibility shift (rationalization) • Morally non-critical • Self-censorship (don’t rock the boat) • Unanimity? (silence = consent) • Direct pressure from above • Mind-guarding (preventing introduction of dissenting views)

  14. NASA: CHALLENGER & COLUMBIA • Absence of culture of dissent • Better engineering decisions result from the annealing fire of dissenting views

More Related