1 / 0

Topics in Microeconometrics Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University at Curtin Business Sc

Topics in Microeconometrics Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University at Curtin Business School Curtin University Perth July 22-24, 2013. 6. Applications. Applications. Range of Applications. Regulated industries – railroads, electricity, public services

garnet
Télécharger la présentation

Topics in Microeconometrics Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University at Curtin Business Sc

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Topics in Microeconometrics Professor William Greene Stern School of Business, New York University at Curtin Business School Curtin University Perth July 22-24, 2013
  2. 6. Applications

  3. Applications

  4. Range of Applications Regulated industries – railroads, electricity, public services Health care delivery – nursing homes, hospitals, health care systems (WHO) Banking and Finance Many, many (many) other industries. See Lovell and Schmidt survey…
  5. Discrete Variables Count data frontier Outcomes inside the frontier: Preserve discrete outcome Patents (Hofler, R. “A Count Data Stochastic Frontier Model,” Infant Mortality (Fe, E., “On the Production of Economic Bads…”)
  6. Count Frontier P(y*|x)=Poisson Model for optimal outcome Effects the distribution: P(y|y*,x)=P(y*-u|x)= a different count model for the mixture of two count variables Effects the mean:E[y*|x]=λ(x) while E[y|x]=u λ(x) with 0 < u < 1. (A mixture model) Other formulations.
  7. Alvarez, Arias, Greene Fixed Management Yit = f(xit,mi*) where mi* = “management” Actual mi = mi* - ui. Actual falls short of “ideal” Translates to a random coefficients stochastic frontier model Estimated by simulation Application to Spanish dairy farms
  8. Fixed Management as an Input Implies Time Variation in Inefficiency
  9. Random Coefficients Frontier Model [Chamberlain/Mundlak: Correlation mi* (not mi-mi*) with xit]
  10. Estimated Model First order production coefficients (standard errors). Quadratic terms not shown.
  11. Inefficiency Distributions Without Fixed Management With Fixed Management
  12. Holloway, Tomberlin, Irz: Coastal Trawl Fisheries Application of frontier to coastal fisheries Hierarchical Bayes estimation Truncated normal model and exponential Panel data application Time varying inefficiency The “good captain” effect vs. inefficiency
  13. Sports Kahane: Hiring practices in hockey Output=payroll, Inputs=coaching, franchise measures Efficiency in payroll related to team performance Battese/Coelli panel data translog model Koop: Performance of baseball players Aggregate output: singles, doubles, etc. Inputs = year, league, team Policy relevance? (Just for fun)
  14. Macro Performance Koop et al. Productivity Growth in a stochastic frontier model Country, year, Yit = ft(Kit,Lit)Eitwit Bayesian estimation OECD Countries, 1979-1988
  15. Mutual Fund Performance Standard CAPM Stochastic frontier added Excess return=a+b*Beta +v – u Sub-model for determinants of inefficiency Bayesian framework Pooled various different distribution estimates
  16. Energy Consumption Derived input to household and community production Cost analogy Panel data, statewide electricity consumption: Filippini, Farsi, et al.
  17. Hospitals Usually cost studies Multiple outputs – case mix “Quality” is a recurrent theme Complexity – unobserved variable Endogeneity Rosko: US Hospitals, multiple outputs, panel data, determinants of inefficiency = HMO penetration, payment policies, also includes indicators of heterogeneity Australian hospitals: Fit both production and cost frontiers. Finds large cost savings from removing inefficiency.
  18. Law Firms Stochastic frontier applied to service industry Output=Revenue Inputs=Lawyers, associates/partners ratio, paralegals, average legal experience, national firm Analogy drawn to hospitals literature – quality aspect of output is a difficult problem
  19. Farming Hundreds of applications Major proving ground for new techniques Many high quality, very low level micro data sets O’Donnell/Griffiths – Philippine rice farms Latent class – favorable or unfavorable climate Panel data production model Bayesian – has a difficult time with latent class models. Classical is a better approach
  20. Railroads and other Regulated Industries Filippini – Maggi: Swiss railroads, scale effects etc. Also studied effect of different panel data estimators Coelli – Perelman, European railroads. Distance function. Developed methodology for distance functions Many authors: Electricity (C&G). Used as the standard test data for Bayesian estimators
  21. Banking Dozens of studies Wheelock and Wilson, U.S. commercial banks Turkish Banking system Banks in transition countries U.S. Banks – Fed studies (hundreds of studies) Typically multiple output cost functions Development area for new techniques Many countries have very high quality data available
  22. Sewers New York State sewage treatment plants 200+ statewide, several thousand employees Used fixed coefficients technology lnE = a + b*lnCapacity + v – u; b < 1 implies economies of scale (almost certain) Fit as frontier functions, but the effect of market concentration was the main interest
More Related