1 / 23

Professional Staff Salary Administration Plan

Professional Staff Salary Administration Plan . 1996 - 2007. Consumer Price Index (CPI). From July 1996 – January 2007 the cost of living grew by 38.5% July 1996 CPI: 162.2 Jan 2007 CPI: 224.4 (224.4/162.2)-1 = 38.5

garren
Télécharger la présentation

Professional Staff Salary Administration Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Professional Staff Salary Administration Plan 1996 - 2007

  2. Consumer Price Index (CPI) • From July 1996 – January 2007 the cost of living grew by 38.5% • July 1996 CPI: 162.2 • Jan 2007 CPI: 224.4 • (224.4/162.2)-1 = 38.5 Index used: Boston MSA, all urban consumers. Data extracted on: April 7, 2007 (5:06:12 PM) from http://www.bls.Gov/cpi/home.htm

  3. Base Rate Increase (BRI) vs. Consumer Price Index (CPI)

  4. Base Rate Increase (BRI) vs. Consumer Price Index (CPI)

  5. BRI vs. CPI

  6. Boston PSSAP

  7. Grade 27 Boston

  8. Grade 36 Boston

  9. Amherst PSSAP

  10. Grade 25 Amherst

  11. Grade 36 Amherst

  12. Merit Max 25 vs 36

  13. Merit Max – Grade 25

  14. Amherst Ranges 99 – 05

  15. Amherst Ranges 02 – 05

  16. Employment Cost Index (ECI) Employment Cost Index (NAICS) Series Catalog: Series ID : CIU3010000100000A (B,I) Not Seasonally Adjusted Compensation : Total compensation Sector : State and local government Periodicity : 12-month percent change

  17. MAX: No Correlation to ECI

  18. Maxed-Out Amherst Members

  19. Effect of Merit Max • The highest performing long-term employees in the unit are receiving ever diminishing returns for their efforts. • Decreasing morale among unit members due to the growing gap in compensation between similarly situated employees based only on their unit status. • By submitting salary calculations based on the Merit Maximum to the legislature, management spurned otherwise available funding for the Amherst campus.

  20. Solution: Remove Merit Max • High performing employees should be rewarded for their efforts and should be held harmless from the application of an arbitrary and capricious Merit Maximum over the past year. • Equity should be restored between unit and non-unit employees performing similar work. • Union members should not suffer because management turned away otherwise available funds. • The PSSAP Salary Schedules at both Boston and Amherst should be reset to remove the artificial distortions and the bring the scales into line with the impact of 11 years of inflation. The easiest way to do this is to increase all the scales on both campuses at the same rate as the BRI.

  21. Solution: Restore Integrity to the Salary Schedules • Reset the midpoints to BRI • Reset the minimums and maximums by calculating a 50% spread in each grade.

  22. Solution: Restore Integrity to the Salary Schedules

  23. Solution: Restore Integrity to the Salary Schedules

More Related