230 likes | 240 Vues
This article explores classical derivations of the CAPM and discusses the contributions of William Sharpe, John Lintner, and Jan Mossin. Topics include equilibrium, quadratic utility functions, efficient frontier, and mean-variance portfolio theory.
E N D
Microfoundations of Financial Economics2004-2005 Professor André Farber Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles
CAPM: the real stuff • Today we will look at various classical derivations of the CAPM. • 1. Mossin • Equilibrium of an exchange economy • Based on quadratic utility functions • 2. Mathematics of the efficient frontier PhD 03
William Forsyth Sharpe • From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. • William Forsyth Sharpe (born June 16, 1934) is Professor of Finance, Emeritus at Stanford University's Graduate School of Business and the winner of the 1990Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel. • Dr. Sharpe taught at the University of Washington and the University of California at Irvine. In 1970 he joined the Stanford University. He was one of the originators of the Capital Asset Pricing Model, created the Sharpe ratio for risk-adjusted investment performance analysis, contributed to the development of the binomial method for the valuation of options, the gradient method for asset allocation optimization, and returns-based style analysis for evaluating the style and performance of investment funds. • He served as a President of the American Finance Association. • He received his Ph.D., M.A., and B.A. in Economics from the University of California at Los Angeles. He is also the recipient of a Doctor of Humane Letters, Honoris Causa from DePaul University, a Doctor Honoris Causa from the University of Alicante (Spain), a Doctor Honoris Causa from the University of Vienna and the UCLA Medal, UCLA's highest honor. • Bibliography • Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets (McGraw-Hill, 1970 and 2000) • Asset Allocation Tools (Scientific Press, 1987) • Fundamentals of Investments (with Gordon J. Alexander and Jeffrey Bailey, Prentice-Hall, 2000) • Investments (with Gordon J. Alexander and Jeffrey Bailey, Prentice-Hall, 1999) PhD 03
John Lintner • Wikipedia does not yet have a page called John Lintner. • To start the page, begin typing in the box below. When you're done, press the "Save page" button. Your changes should be visible immediately. • If you have created this page in the past few minutes and it has not yet appeared, it may not be visible due to a delay in updating the database. Please wait and check again later before attempting to recreate the page. • Please do not create an article to promote yourself, a website, a product, or a business (see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not). • If you are new to Wikipedia, please read the tutorial before creating your first article, and only use the sandbox for editing experiments. • Search for John Lintner in Wikipedia PhD 03
Jan Mossin • From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. • Jan Mossin (b. 1936 in Oslo – d. 1987) was a Norwegian economist. He graduated with a siviløkonom degree from the Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration (NHH) in 1959. After a couple of years in business, he started his PhD studies in the Spring semester of 1962 at Carnegie Mellon University (then Carnegie Institute of Technology). • One of the papers in his doctoral dissertation was a very important contribution to the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). At Carnegie Mellon he was, among others, awarded the Alexander Henderson Award for 1968 for this contribution. If Jan Mossin had lived longer he would most likely had been a candidate for the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel in 1990 together with Professors Sharpe and Lintner. • After he had finished his PhD he returned to NHH where he in 1968 was tenured professor. PhD 03
CAPM à la Mossin • 1 period model • Investor i has quadratic utility function over future wealth Y • n firms issue shares • 1 share outstanding per firm • pjprice per share • xj(s) payoff of firm j in state s • σjkcovariance of payoffs of firm j and k PhD 03
Investor’s problem PhD 03
FOC j=1,…,n Note: with zj* solution of: j=1,…,n PhD 03
Market clearing conditions j=1,…,n PhD 03
Equilibrium PhD 03
Equilibrium (2) FOC (in equilibrium) can be written as: Solving for pj: PhD 03
Equilibrium (3) Define: bj is the contribution of company j to the market’s total variance λ is a measure of the market risk aversion, the same for all companies we can write the equilibrium value of the firm as: PhD 03
Beta formulation The equilibrium price can be written as: Define: PhD 03
Mean-Variance Frontier Calculation: brute force Mean variance portfolio: s.t. Matrix notations: PhD 03
Some math… Lagrange: FOC: Define: PhD 03
Interpretation The frontier can be spanned by two frontier returns E 1 g+h A/C Minimum variance portfolio MVP H 0 PhD 03
Zero covariance portfolio The covariance between any two frontier portfolios p and q is: For any two frontier portfolios p (except the MVP), there exists a unique frontier portfolio with which p has zero covariance: PhD 03
Zero Covariance Portfolio in the σ, E space E(R) p E(Rp) zc(p) E[Rzc(p)] σ(R) PhD 03
Toward a Zero-Beta Capital Asset Pricing Model p E(Rp) q zc(p) E[Rzc(p)] σ(R) PhD 03
Some math Proof on demand – see DD Chap 7 Apply to ZC portfolio: Apply to p: Divide: Rearrange: PhD 03
Another proof (more intuitive??) Consider a fraction ainvested in stock q and (1-a) in p The slope is equal to the slope of tangent As: PhD 03
Zero-Beta CAPM In equilibrium, the market portfolio is on the efficient frontier If there exist a risk free asset: E(Rzc(M)) = Rf Empirical test: Roll critique If proxy used for the market portfolio, linear relationship doesn’t hold PhD 03
Next session • Efficient frontier in Hilbert space (wooow..) • Where are the SDF in the CAPM? PhD 03