1 / 9

PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1

PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1. Introduction and Scope of Lectures - History Public Order Act 1936 Public Order Act 1986 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1. BREACH OF THE PEACE AT COMMON LAW Meaning? – see R v. Howell [1981] 3 All ER 383 at p.389.

gaye
Télécharger la présentation

PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1 • Introduction and Scope of Lectures - History • Public Order Act 1936 • Public Order Act 1986 • Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994

  2. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1 • BREACH OF THE PEACE AT COMMON LAW • Meaning? – see R v. Howell [1981] 3 All ER 383 at p.389. • "there is a breach of the peace whenever harm is actually done or is likely to be done to a person or in his presence to his property or a person is in fear of being so harmed through an assault, an affray, a riot, an unlawful assembly or other disturbance.” per Watkins LJ • Note number of elements to this definition.

  3. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1 • Cf. Lord Denning in R. v. Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall ex p CEGB [1981] 3 All ER 826 at p.832: • "there is a breach of the peace whenever a person who is lawfully carrying out his work is unlawfully and physically prevented by another from doing it.“ • Percy v. D.P.P. [1995] 3 All ER 123 • Nicol [1996]1 Journal of Civil Liberties 75

  4. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1 • Steel and Lush v. United Kingdom [1999] 4 Journal of Civil Liberties 129 • Power to Arrest for Breach of the Peace • R v. Howell [1981] 3 All ER 383 • McConnell v. Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 1 All ER 423. • R v. Morpeth Justices ex p Ward (1992) 95 Cr App R 215

  5. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1 • Foulkes v Chief Constable of the Merseyside Police [1998] EWCA Civ 938 • Redmond-Bate v. DPP [1999] Crim L R 998, [1999] 4 Journal of Civil Liberties 382 • Bibby v. Chief Constable of the Essex Police [2000] EWCA Civ 113, [2000] 5 • Note the effect of the Human Rights Act 1998.

  6. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1 • Action Taken to Prevent a Breach of the Peace • Note the ‘duty / power’ formula adopted by the courts. • Removal of Insignia - Humphries v. Connor (1874) Ir CLR 1 • Entry to Private Property - Thomas v. Sawkins [1935] 2 KB 249 (see now s.17(6) PACE and note McLeod v. United Kingdom [1999] 4 Journal of Civil Liberties 140)

  7. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1 • Restricting Freedom of Movement- Moss v. McLachlan [1984] IRLR 76. • This approach was confirmed post- HRA in R (Laporte) v. Chief Constable of Gloucestershire and ors [2004] EWCA Civ 1639. • Moving People on – Duncan v. Jones [1936] 1 KB 218. • Does this approach satisfy UK obligations under the ECHR??

  8. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1 • Note the concept of a bind-over: • Lansbury v. Riley [1914] 3 KB 229. • Obstruction of a Police Officer – s.88 Police Act 1996. • Note that unlike ‘breach of the peace’ this is a substantive criminal offence in England and Wales.

  9. PUBLIC ORDER LAW 1 • Obstruction of the Highway • s.137 Highways Act 1980 : note the requirement that the obstruction must be "wilful” and “without lawful excuse.” • Hirst v. Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (1986) 85 Cr App R 143. • Birch v DPP [2000] Crim LR 301

More Related