1 / 36

What’s new in Calibrations

What’s new in Calibrations. Kurt Woschnagg, UCB. IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Ghent, October 10, 2007. Selected Calibration Topics. Waveform Calibration DOMcalibrator [C. Roucelle] Linearity/Saturation [S. Seunarine ]

genna
Télécharger la présentation

What’s new in Calibrations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What’s new in Calibrations Kurt Woschnagg, UCB IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Ghent, October 10, 2007

  2. Selected Calibration Topics • Waveform Calibration • DOMcalibrator [C. Roucelle] • Linearity/Saturation [S. Seunarine] • Relative DOM efficiency [H. Johannson] • Golden DOMs [M. Inaba] • Ice Properties • Dust logger update: deep ash layer found [R. Bay] • Standard Candle • Waveform analysis [M. Inaba] • Azimuthal asymmetry [J. Kiryluk] • New data (IC22+TWR) • Ice Shear • Interstring flasher data [KW] • Muon tomography [M. Olivo] • Inclinometers [R. Bay]

  3. DOMcalibrator [Cécile Roucelle] : icecube/200709001

  4. Dual t droop correction

  5. General case

  6. PMT linearity/saturation [Suruj Seunarine] Sketch of the method Measured V Expected V

  7. PMT linearity/saturation DOMs have different saturation levels Will be parameterized → DB → DOMcalibrator In-situ flasher data

  8. Relative DOM efficiency [Henrik Johansson] • Calculate average nphotons seen by a DOM from a • track at distance r (use well-reconstructed tracks) • Fit curve according to theory: exp(a-b·r) • Use <nphotons(r=0)> as measure • of DOM efficiency • Relate individual efficiencies to • mean efficiency

  9. Relative DOM efficiency Two ways to estimate <nphotons> exp(a-b·r) nHits from FE Use track detection probability

  10. Relative DOM efficiency Attempt to decouple ice effects Use average b, refit a Grouping by b, abs, z

  11. Relative DOM efficiency ongoing…

  12. Calibration of ROMEO with GDOM Outline [Kotoyo for Mina Inaba] Comparison DOMINANT+ROMEO Simulation PMT Calib. Data Glass+Gel Calib.Data DOM Calib.data • Challenging : • Large PhotoCathode area … Difficult to do overall ABSOLUTE calibration - Combine RELATIVE 2D measurement + small-area ABSOLUTE efficiency measurement ( )

  13. Glass + Gel : Acceptance simulationNew transmittance and DOMINANT Outline • Transmittance of glass/gel is updated • Gel : available for all DOMS ! :) • Glass :still small sample(less than 10), need continuous monitoring New Acceptance Photon Acceptance Old DOMINANT Simulation Injection angle : 0deg (off-axis) Beam size : 8mm Beam location : center of PMT Parallel beam • Updated DOMINANT(Geant4) • New glass/gel transmit. • Harness, MB, FB, HV installed • Fresnel reflection ON Wavelength [nm]

  14. Outline Golden DOM calibration Summary • We averaged available PMT calibration data • New Glass/Gel transmittance table is applied to DOMINANT simulation • The averaged absolute calibration of GDOM and Romeo + DOMINANT simulation with averaged calib data shows GOOD agreement over all wavelength range • New Romeo + DOMINANT simulation represents Stoyan’s In Water Angle Acceptance measurement

  15. Dust logger update [Ryan Bay] First ash layer identified in instrumented volume: Corresponds to known 92,000 year old ash layer in Dome C core

  16. Dust logging in the coming season

  17. Standard Candle Basics Standard Candle I ~4ns @337nm Full intensity: (4.0±0.4)×1012/pulse 40” N2 laser 8”

  18. Standard Candle I: waveform analysis [Aya for Mina Inaba] ATWD based total estimated Npe 100% ? First guess center of brightness COBy [m] COBx [m]

  19. Standard Candle I: ATWD waveforms on str39 ATWD waveform of str39 DOM10 DOM11 DOM13 DOM15 DOM16 DOM18 DOM19 DOM20 DOM21 DOM25 DOM28 DOM30 MC Real

  20. Standard Candle I: ATWD waveforms on str40 ATWD waveform of str40 DOM10 DOM11 DOM13 DOM15 DOM16 DOM17 DOM18 DOM25 DOM26 DOM28 DOM29 DOM30 MC Real

  21. Standard Candle I: waveform analysis [Aya for Mina Inaba] Charge Ratio MC/Real 1690m 1910m 1920m 1680m SC

  22. Standard Candle I: azimuthal asymmetry 1.30 [rad] 2.35 [rad] 3.45 [rad] 4.34 [rad] [Joanna Kiryluk] Standard Candle data SC DOM Number

  23. Standard Candle I: 22-string data [Taboada/Filimonov] Data taken on September 18, 2007 • pDAQ IC22+TWR default configuration • PnF running • 7 filter wheel settings: 0.5%-100% • SC @ 1Hz, 2000 pulses/setting • 80 GBytes of raw data → SC filtering needed • Filtered data now in Data Warehouse: /data/exp/IceCube/2007/internal-system/ DebugData/1004/DebugData_SCData_Oct03.tar.gz • First pDAQ calibration data taken without detector downtime (as envisioned in the PDD) Milestone

  24. Standard Candle I: 22-string data run 109337 run 109338 100% 50% 30% 10% 5%

  25. Standard Candle I: 22-string data 5% setting, ~120 DOMs 100% setting, ~250 DOMs [AMANDA hits not shown]

  26. How to take future Standard Candle data [I. Taboada] • Write a Standard Candle trigger • Base trigger on multiplicity, topology, timing • Create a pDAQ configuration that enables this trigger Otherwise configuration identical to default • Add a PnF filter that runs all the time to select events with a SC trigger No downtime and automatic filtering of SC data

  27. Standard Candle II • To be deployed on string 55 (3rd of the season) • Between DOMs 42 and 43 • λprop (2150 m) ~38 m (SC-II) • λprop (1813 m) ~22 m (SC-I) • Pointing down (SC-I points up) • About 10 times brighter than SC-I • Filter wheel dynamic range: • SC-II: 1500 • SC-I: 120

  28. Standard Candles 57 • Standard Candle II • deploy next season • pointing downward 63 64 55

  29. Ice Flow and Shear flow model Three experimental approaches: 1. Using the three deep AMANDA strings 2. Muon tomography 3. Inclinometers http://wiki.icecube.wisc.edu/index.php/Ice_shear_measurement

  30. Using the deep AMANDA strings ●48/57/58: recently deployed = ~vertical ●11/12/13: in the ice for >9 years

  31. Pilot Runs 9/17 Dawn Williams Andreas Gross ~1700 m ~2000 m ~2300 m

  32. What resolution can we achieve? Zoom in: 1 bin = 5 ns ≈ 1 m ~2300 m

  33. muon tomography [Martino Olivo] Reconstruct tracks (include the DOM) Move DOM around (virtually), keep tracks stationary See how reco likelihood changes → Pandel function

  34. muon tomography

  35. muon tomography Under development…

  36. Biaxial tiltmeter for constraining shear @ ~2430 m (on 3-4 strings 2007/08) [Ryan Bay] Special Devices breakout y x ~0.5°/year 3 strings meters per year Angular resolution: 0.01° Angular range: +/- 25° Operating temp: -40 to 85 °C Pressure vessel <2” I.D. (TBD)

More Related