1 / 29

Report on behalf of CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG

CTC 18 May 2010 CES studies for CDR : 1. Tunnel cross section 2. Injection Complex 3. BDS Layout Experimental Area Layout Summary. Report on behalf of CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG. 1.Tunnel cross section. 4.5m tunnel for CDR as agreed in 2009.

geona
Télécharger la présentation

Report on behalf of CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CTC 18 May 2010 CES studies for CDR : 1. Tunnel cross section 2. Injection Complex 3. BDS Layout Experimental Area Layout Summary Report on behalf of CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG

  2. 1.Tunnel cross section

  3. 4.5m tunnel for CDR as agreed in 2009

  4. Drawbacks with 4.5m tunnel identified in 2009 • Positioning of electronic racks not ideal • Solution : Re-position onto tunnel floor, but possibly means deleting safety barrier • Difficult to access ‘tunnel wall’ side of modules • Solution : remove entire module for access ? • Access to Drive Beam dumps • Solution : Local Tunnel enlargement to allow ‘ladder’ access (see next slides) • Impact from vibration from floor embedded pipes • Solution : Further studies in TD Phase • Reduced space due to transversal ventilation and perhaps not sufficient cooling power • Solution : Study longitudinal ventilation system during TD Phase • No space for vehicle powering ‘monorail’ and integration conflict • Inductive powering for vehicle ?

  5. Revised 4.5m cross section

  6. Access to Drive beam dump

  7. Access to LHC Dumps at Point 6

  8. Cross section for ILC Europe (CERN) 5.2m diameter for Kly-Cluster

  9. Possible 5.2m cross section for CLIC

  10. ‘Metro standard’ 5.6m tunnel +150MCHF : Proposed at CTC May 2009

  11. 2. Injection Complex : Input mainly from : L.Rinolfi B.Jeanneret F.Stulle

  12. Injection Complex 2009 Layout

  13. Injection Complex 2010 Layout ‘turnaround’ is now a horizontal cut/cover design • 1.1km extra tunnel for turnarounds • 500m extra for CR, DR • Injection cut and cover tunnels lengths increased to 1.4km (from 1km)

  14. ‘Spiral descents’ removed

  15. Surface tunnels / halls for Injection Complex 2010 Layout : Surface buildings added

  16. CLIC Damping Rings schematic layout Damping rings still to be finalised e- DR to Booster linac transfer line Dump 205 m 80 m e- Damping Ring e- PDR to DR transfer line e+ linac to PDR transfer line 157 m e- Pre-damping Ring 64 m e+ Pre-damping Ring e- linac to PDR transfer line e+ PDR to DR transfer line 205 m 80 m e+ Damping Ring e+ DR to Booster linac transfer line

  17. ON - HOLD

  18. 3. BDS Layout Input mainly from : Rogelio Tomas Garcia EddaGschwendtner

  19. Main Beam Dumps

  20. Tune-Up Dumps added

  21. 4. Experimental Area Layout

  22. CLIC Detector hall layout developed by : A.Gaddi H.Gerwig A.Herve CES will now use this as starting point for CE & services design, including cost estimates

  23. Machine By-Pass added Emergency escape tunnel Gantry crane capacities to be determined Better to delete cavern ‘technical alcoves’ Survey gallery added CV being consulted about requirements

  24. ILC 3d models developed at CERN using CATIA : CLIC models to follow once draughtsman is identified

  25. Overall layout updated (full symmetry)

  26. 5. Summary • Will continue to try and ‘freeze’ CE layouts at monthly CES meeting. Next major issue is amount of space required for Power Converters. • Martin Gastal is gathering input from other technical services for experimental hall (CV,EL etc) • Costing for CDR required for all technical infrastructure by September with assistance from Amberg consultants (same CE consultants for ILC) • Draft layout for CDR Chapter ‘Civil Engineering and Services’ has been submitted to Hermann

  27. BACK-UP SLIDE

  28. CTC 19 May 2009 Summary • With a 4.5m diameter tunnel, it appears difficult to accommodate all equipment • 5.6m recommended by CES working group • More TBM’s of this diameter available will help with Project planning • Reduction in other costs due to more additional working space ? Space for future requests…. • Additional CE cost in the region of 150M CHF Barcelona Metro under construction 6.6m machine external, inner 5.8m. With 0.1m tolerance on radius = 5.6m internal diameter.

More Related