1 / 28

What does Elsevier count?

What does Elsevier count?. Use Measures for Electronic Resources: Theory & Practice ALCTS Program, ALA, Chicago. Daviess Menefee Director, Library Relations, Americas Date: June 27, 2005. My Agenda for today. Part 1: Some history on usage reporting with ScienceDirect

georgem
Télécharger la présentation

What does Elsevier count?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. What does Elsevier count? Use Measures for Electronic Resources: Theory & Practice ALCTS Program, ALA, Chicago Daviess Menefee Director, Library Relations, Americas Date: June 27, 2005

  2. My Agenda for today • Part 1: Some history on usage reporting with ScienceDirect • Part 2: Present some of the business aspects of usage from a publisher’s point of view • Part 3: Look at a couple of interesting results on usage and its reporting from our internal studies

  3. Not too long ago…. • ScienceDirect usage reports were: • Word Documents • Derived by processing logfiles on a PC, over a single weekend • Provided only the barest of data • Began with 6 insisting customers • Delivered via email by the assigned Account Manager • Never detailed what was not used.

  4. Did we know what we were doing? • We thought so. • Some internal concern over the potential impact of usage reports on subscriptions • No standard or benchmarks to follow • Navigating in the dark • Had high hopes to advance the “science” of usage reporting and analysis. But we didn’t know what that was. • Usage reporting grew organically from the demands of the market as well as the business.

  5. And then we made some mistakes. • Usage reporting and transactional downloads were not fully reconcilable. Two different systems in play. • Not including 0 usage in the reports caused a degree of unreliability in the reports. • Trying to define sessions in a session-less state was not very productive.

  6. But then we did some good things. • Published a white paper indicating that we were reducing the number of downloads based on user behavior. (Our sales staff were not pleased.) • Invested heavily in designing and implementing a state of the art system that could provide reports directly to the customer. • Supported the establishment of Counter.

  7. Did we learn anything? • Yes, about customer reporting. We have improved as an industry in defining and delivering them. We have come a long way. • We have created a trusted third party group to monitor and audit the reports. • We continue to study user behavior and try to understand it better.

  8. Part 2: Why does Elsevier count usage? Data for business information such as • Trends • Product Performance • Return On Investment Need Data for Informed decisions • Determine Future Directions, ex: Pricing

  9. Elsevier Management Reports • Produced Monthly • Summarize Key Performance Indicators • Indicators: Major Areas • Content • System • Customers • Other (Links, trials, Web Editions, etc.)

  10. Performance Indicators for SD • Content Indicators • Number of Journals • Number of Abstracts • Number of full-text articles available • System Performance • Number of Page Requests • Total Full-text articles downloaded, PDF/HTML • Total Articles incl. SD On Site • Total Searches

  11. Performance Indicators, 2 • Customers • Number of Contracts • Number of Registered Accounts • Number of Active Accounts • Estimated number of user sessions • Number of Active Users (cookie based)

  12. More on Performance Indicators • “Other areas” measured: • Trial Customers • Guest Usage • Esp. Article downloads (PPV) • Web Editions (limited to customer base statistics) • Promotional Usage • Scirus (no. of searches and indexed pages) • Linking Indicators

  13. What is the point? • Company has set target numbers for most areas of the KPI’s. • Change our thinking from traditional publishing to how to grow an electronic journals--books business. • Enables the setting of objectives and priorities. • Publishing units now have usage goals.

  14. Product Management Reports • Opportunity for product managers to review and comment on trends or explain why a number is out of proportion. • Examples: • Usage of abstracts decreased during the month but the number of guests users increased. • MathML increased this month over last month and points to a trend of continuing growth.

  15. Data is converted to graphs

  16. What’s worth counting? • Just about everything that involves end users and content. • Full-text Articles are the norm but Elsevier also continues to monitor browsing behavior especially from guest users (a possible new market). • Important to look at changes and how that effects any usage (training, system changes, etc.)

  17. Part 3: Some Internal Studies 1. Referring URL Study • Who is sending us the traffic? • What are the subject areas where users come into the product? 2. Usage on Usage Study • Are these reports really being used? • Who is using them? • What triggers use?

  18. Traffic Referrals to SD • Major Sites (95%): • Customers’ OPACs • PubMed • Elsevier Site – Cell Press • Cross Ref • ChemPort • Search Engines (Scirus)

  19. Referrals as a Chart

  20. SD Entry by Subject Areas

  21. Some Analysis on Subject Entry • Life Science end users prefer to come into ScienceDirect from 3rd party sources, namely the A&I databases • Humanities and Social Scientists prefer the Journal Home Page on ScienceDirect • For some areas there appears no difference: Energy, Chemical Engineering, Mat Sciences and Engineering.

  22. 2. Usage of Usage Reports • Internal Elsevier Study of use of ScienceDirect usage reports • Who uses usage reports? • Asia/Pacific Librarians lead the list • What triggers use of these reports • Email Alerts • Asia/Pacific has the most alerts set up • 63% customers use the reports when they have an alert as opposed to 30% without the alert.

  23. Effect of Alerts

  24. Popular Usage Reports

  25. Number of Reports over time

  26. Usage Reports: did we over build? • ScienceDirect data may indicate such. • But the data may be useful some day and probably best to keep it at hand for now. • Are there more functional reports that should be developed, e.g. factor in cost of content for performance measure?

  27. To really end this presentation- • We still do not know enough about user behavior and how that affects the numbers. • We do know that the users are disparate and have different usage patterns in their respective subjects. • Open question: what are meaningful numbers and in what context. Answer may be a local solution. • Publishers don’t have all the answers either.

  28. Thank You! d.menefee@elsevier.com

More Related