1 / 21

Anti-Corruption – The Role of Governance and Audit

Anti-Corruption – The Role of Governance and Audit. 31st International Symposium on Economic Crime 5 September 2013 Jesus College, Cambridge University Anita C. Esslinger, Partner Bryan Cave 88 Wood Street London EC2V 7AJ +44(0)20 3207 1224 acesslinger@bryancave.com. LN01289408.

Télécharger la présentation

Anti-Corruption – The Role of Governance and Audit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anti-Corruption – The Role of Governance and Audit 31st International Symposium on Economic Crime 5 September 2013 Jesus College, Cambridge University Anita C. Esslinger, Partner Bryan Cave 88 Wood Street London EC2V 7AJ +44(0)20 3207 1224 acesslinger@bryancave.com LN01289408

  2. Anti-Corruption – The Role of Governance and Audit • Role of the private sector in promoting integrity and addressing corruption • What more can be done by official organisations to facilitate the private sector and to address corruption

  3. Role of the Private Sector • Special responsibilities for preventing bribery and discouraging subordinates from engaging in corrupt activities fall squarely on companies, their directors and senior management • The UK Bribery Act: Strict liability for failure to prevent bribery by associated persons unless the company has implemented adequate procedures aimed at preventing such bribery • US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA): Vicarious liability for the acts of employees and agents

  4. Corporate Governance Codes • Listed companies have governance responsibilities that include requirements for internal control systems encompassing policies and processes that help ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations and with internal policies in the conduct of business • Sarbanes-Oxley • UK Corporate Governance Code • OECD and other sources of principles of good governance • Non-listed companies also recognise benefits of good governance

  5. Risks of Getting it Wrong • Serious criminal and civil penalties • Disgorgement of profits, civil and shareholder suits • Multiple investigation costs – legal fees • Diversion of management time • Debarment from public contracts and by public international organisations (e.g. World Bank) • Loss of licenses and permits • Loss of value in investments or acquisitions • Loss of business from suppliers and customers • LOSS OF REPUTATION

  6. Adequate Procedures and Governance • Elements of both include the need for “tone from the top” in: • Establishing a culture of ethical behaviour and integrity where corruption is unacceptable, and communicating and embedding it in the organisation • Unless it is clear that the directors and senior management of the company take these issues seriously, they will not be taken seriously by rank and file employees and associated persons who perform services for or act on behalf of the company • Rules – but more: Values and principles

  7. Adequate Procedures and Governance • Tone from the top requires senior management involvement in: • Developing internal controls covering anti-corruption policies and procedures, including providing adequate resources, and appointing and supporting senior managers to “own” and oversee compliance – with appropriate access to the company’s governing bodies such as the board and audit committee • Monitoring and reviewing the implementation and effectiveness of compliance policies and procedures, with appropriate reporting mechanisms to company’s governing bodies

  8. Monitoring and Review Mechanisms • Ongoing transaction monitoring • Due diligence/risk assessment – agents, M&A, investments • Keeping an open door for advice and in training • Surveys/certifications • Whistleblowing arrangements • Investigations • Audits • Reporting to senior management

  9. Whistleblowing • Whistleblowing arrangements form part of a system of internal controls necessary for good corporate governance and are an important part of an effective anti-corruption compliance program • For example, the UK Corporate Governance Code provides that the audit committee should review arrangements by which staff may, in confidence, raise concerns about possible improprieties • Need for clear and well publicized points of contact for reporting suspected violations or seeking advice – including paths for escalation

  10. Whistleblowing • In order to encourage employees or others to come forward, they must be protected and not subject to retaliation of any sort (even if a good faith report proves to be incorrect) • Policies must make this clear, but mere statement of a policy of non-retaliation may not be enough • While anonymity raises difficult connotations and data protection issues in many European countries, the importance of being able to provide confidentiality to the whistleblower is generally recognised

  11. Whistleblowing • It is important that employees believe that their reports and requests for advice will be treated seriously and that there be confidence that any report of a suspected violation will be properly investigated • Assuming a report warrants investigation, companies should explain how such investigations will be conducted, including • Fairness for employees under suspicion • Confidentiality for the whistleblower

  12. Investigations • A specific protocol or procedure for conducting investigations should be communicated in the organisation • Legal advice needs to be sought including to ensure rights are protected • The investigator must be independent and impartial • Confidentiality should be protected where possible • What to do with results? • Corrective or remedial action if necessary – lessons learned communicated

  13. Audits • Role of Internal Auditors • Often improper payments are uncovered by internal auditors • But in the past, the role of internal audit has been more limited to financial audits with a materiality standard, rather than auditing the effectiveness of compliance programs, including those aimed at preventing corruption

  14. Audits • Evolving role of internal auditors • Need for training and defining key performance indicators, identifying risks and metrics for measuring compliance • Petty cash reviews – goes beyond materiality standard • Sampling techniques • Interviews – a special skill

  15. Audits • Some measurable elements of anti-corruption programs • Risk identification • Roles and responsibilities • Design and operation of policies to prevent bribery and promote its communication in the company • Evidence of training • Evidence of due diligence and contractual processes and record retention • Evidence of how reports are received and handled

  16. Audits • Pro-active audits of high risk operations have been required in some settlements with the US Department of Justice and the SEC • Similar to in-depth transactional reviews but focused on high risk • Generally require a team approach: lawyers, auditors and compliance personnel • A detailed protocol of what is to be covered

  17. Reporting • Reporting to the board or audit committee of results of audits and investigations and recommendations for improvements is an important element in good governance

  18. What can official organisations to do help in addressing corruption? • Promotion of good governance by governments • Citizen engagement • Rule of law • Effective institutions • Transparency • UN High Level Panel Report on post-2015 priorities, calling for a stand-alone goal for good governance, including a target to reduce bribery and corruption – a start?

  19. What can official organisations to do help in addressing corruption? • The problem of “passive bribery” by officials • Facilitation payments – especially customs clearance and difficulties faced by freight forwarders and importers in difficult jurisdictions • Is the private sector alone capable of eliminating facilitation payments? • Is it realistic to criminalise and require zero tolerance in such situations? • What can governments and organisations such as the UN Global Compact and the World Bank do?

  20. What can official organisations do to help in addressing corruption? • Greater protection for whistleblowers? • Inconsistent legislation • Lack of protection where complained of conduct is outside the jurisdiction • Confidentiality and anonymity issues • Evidence gathering tensions – public interest? • Rewards? • Do these discourage internal reporting?

  21. What can official organisations do to help in addressing corruption? • Continued vigilance and enforcement of anti-corruption laws

More Related