1 / 35

University of the German Armed Forces Munich

University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering Institute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken.

gerd
Télécharger la présentation

University of the German Armed Forces Munich

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering Institute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics Laboratory of Engineering InformaticsUniv.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken A method for the development and control of stiffness matrices for the calculation of beam and shell structures using the symbolic programming language MAPLE N. Gebbeken, E. Pfeiffer, I. Videkhina

  2. Relevance of the topic In structural engineering the design and calculation of beam and shell structures is a daily practice. Beam and shell elements can also be combined in spatial structures like bridges, multi-story buildings, tunnels, impressive architectural buildings etc. Trussstructure, Railway bridge Firth of Forth (Scotland) Folded plate structure, Church in Las Vegas University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  3. Inside pointsof grid Outside pointsof grid Centerpoint Y i,j+1 i+1,j+1 i-1,j+1 y i+1,j i-1,j i,j y i-1,j-1 i,j-1 i+1,j-1 x x X Boundary of continuum Calculation methods In the field of engineering mechanics, structural mechanics and structural informatics the calculation methods are based in many cases on the discretisation of continua, i.e. the reduction of the manifold of state variables to a finite number at discrete points. Type of discretisation e.g.: - Finite Difference Method (FDM) Differential quotients are substitutedthrough difference quotients University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  4. v2 v3 Continuum u2 u3 v1 u1 Calculation methods - type of discretisation - Finite Element Method (FEM) First calculation step: Degrees of freedom in nodes.Second calculation step: From the primary unknowns the state variables at the edges of the elements and inside are derived. Static calculation of a concrete panel University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  5. Calculation methods - type of discretisation - Meshfree particle solvers(e.g. Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH)) for high velocity impacts, large deformations and fragmentation Experimental und numeric presentation of a high velocity impact:a 5 [mm] bullet with 5.2 [km/s] at a 1.5 [mm] Al-plate. Aluminiumplate Fragment cloud PD Dr.-Ing. habil. Stefan Hiermaier University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  6. FEM-Advantages: • Continua can easily be approximated with different elementgeometries (e.g. triangles, rectangles, tetrahedrons, cuboids) • The strict formalisation of the method enables a simple implementation of new elements in an existing calculus • The convergence of the discretised model to the real systembehaviour can be influenced with well-known strategies,e.g. refinement of the mesh, higher degrees of elementformulations, automated mesh adaptivity depending on stress gradients or local errors University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  7. Aspects about FEM • Extensive fundamentals in mathematics (infinitesimal calculus, calculus of variations, numerical integration, error estimation, error propagation etc.) and mechanics (e.g. nonlinearities of material and the geometry) are needed. Unexperienced users tend to use FEM-programmes as a „black box“. • Teaching the FEM-theory is much more time consuming as other numerical methods, e.g. FDM At this point it is helpful to use the symbolic programming language MAPLE as an eLearning tool: the mathematical background is imparted without undue effort and effects of modified calculation steps or extensions of the FEM-theory can be studied easier! University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  8. l l F The Finite Element Method (FEM) is mostly used for the analysis of structures. Basic concept of FEM is a stiffness matrixR which implicates the vector U of node displacements with vector F of forces. Of interest are state variables like moments (M), shear (Q) and normal forces (N), from which stresses (, ) and resistance capacities (R) are derived. It is necessary to assess the strength of structures depending on stresses.  R University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  9. F Structures should not only be resistant to loads, but also limit deformations andbestable against local or global collapse. Static System ActionsReaction forces Deformation of System Vector S of forces results from the strength of construction. Vector U of the node displacements depends on the system stiffness. H H H H M M M M V V V V University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  10. In the design process of structures we have to take into account not only static actions, but different types of dynamic influences. Typical threat potentials for structures: -The stability against earthquakes - The aerodynamic stability of filigran structures - Weak spot analysis, risk minimisation Citicorp Tower NYC Consequences of wind-inducedvibrations on a suspension bridge Consequences of an earthquake Collapse of the Tacoma Bridge at a wind velocity of 67 [km/h] University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  11. FEM for the solution of structural problems The most static and dynamic influences are represented in thefollowing equation: static problem dynamic problem wind loading - mass (M)- damping (C)- stiffness (R) Mercedes-multistoreyin Munich University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  12. Research goals: 1. The basic purpose of this work is the creation of an universal method for the development of stiffness matrices which are necessary for the calculation of engineering constructions using the symbolic programming language MAPLE. 2. Assessment of correctness of the obtained stiffness matrices. University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  13. Short overview of the fundamental equations for the calculation of beam and shell structures wi wj ui uj i j Beam structures Shell structures Differential equations for a disc (expressed in displacements) Differential equation for a single beam with w- deflection, EJ- bending stiffness (E- modul of elasticity, J- moment of inertia), x- longitudinal axis, q- line load Beams with arbitrary loads and complex boundary conditions 1. Beam on elastic foundation Differential equation for a plate with n- relative stiffness of foundation, k- coefficient of elastic foundation, b- broadness of bearing 2. Theory of second order with - shearing strain 3. Biaxial bending with N- axial force

  14. Calculation of beam structures For the elaboration of the stiffness matrix for beams the following approach will be suggested: 1. Based on the differential equation for a beam the stiffness matrix is developed in a local coordinate system. 2. Consideration of the stiff or hinge connection in the nodes at the end of the beam. 3. Extension of element matrix formulations for beams with different characteristics, e.g. tension/ compression. 4. Transforming the expressions from the local coordinate system into the global coordinate system. 5. The element matrices are assembled in the global stiffness matrix. University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  15. Development of differential equations of beams with or without consideration of the transverse strain R University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  16. Algorithm for the elaboration of a stiffness matrixfor an ordinary beam Basic equations: Solution: homogeneous particular Solution and derivatives in matrix form: D University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  17. Substituting in the first two rows of the matrix D the coordinates for the nodes with x = 0 and x = l we get expressions corresponding to unit displacements of the nodes: D Unit displacements of nodes or L University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  18. fwi fwj f i f j l Qi Qj Mi Mj l Substituting in the second two rows of the matrix D the coordinates for the nodes with x = 0 and x = l follow the shear forces and moments at the ends of a beam corresponding with the reactions: Reaction forces and internal forces or L1 University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  19. We express the integration constants by the displacements of the nodes: Replacing with delivers or in simplified form: University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  20. Within means rthe relative stiffness matrix with EJ = 1 the relative load column with q = 1 The final stiffness matrix r and the load column for an ordinary beam: i j wi wj University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  21. Elaboration of the stiffness matrix for a beam on an elastic foundation In analogous steps the development of the stiffness matrix for a beam on an elastic foundation leads to more difficult differential equations: Basic equations: n relative stiffness of foundation k coefficient of elastic foundationb broadness of bearing Solution: University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  22. Elaboration of the stiffness matrix for a beam on an elastic foundation The final stiffness matrix r and the load column : University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  23. Algorithm for the elaboration of a stiffness matrix for a beam element following the theory of second order Considering transverse strain the algorithm changes substantially. Instead of only one equation two equations are obtained with the two unknowns bending and nodal distortion: Basic equations: with (shearing strain) Solution: University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  24. m m x o x o n z n i j wi wj z m1 Axis of beam(unformed) o1 m1 o1 n1 n1 Axis of beam(bended) Theory of first order Theory of second order The final stiffness matrix r and the load column for a beam element following the theory of second order: University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  25. Fundamental equations for the calculation of beam structures used in the development of the stiffness matrix University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  26. Assessment of correctness of the stiffness matrices Derivations of stiffness matrices are sometimes extensive and sophisticated in mathematics. Therefore, the test of the correctness of the mathematical calculus for this object is an important step in the development process of numerical methods. There are two types of assessment: 1. Compatibility condition 2. Duplication of the length of the element University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  27. 1. Compatibility condition Equation of equilibrium at point О: -x x O Element 1 Element 2 i j i j x x The displacement vectors and can be expressed as Taylor rows: in the centre point O After transformation: University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  28. -x x O Element 1 Element 2 i j i j 2. Duplication of the length of the element x x Equation of equilibrium at point -x, О,  x : Or in matrix form: Rearrangement of rows and columns Application of Jordan’s method with - new value of element and - initial value of element. University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  29. Panel Plate Folded plate structure + + = = p – Boundary load in plane Load  Plane P x y y z x y Boundary of panel x A B Reaction force  Plane A and B – Reaction force in plane Calculation of shell structures Wall- like girder Loaded plate Hall roof- like folded plate structure University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  30. Systematic approach for the development of differential equationsfor a disc University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  31. The system of partial differential equations for discs changes to a system of ordinary differential equations if the displacements are approximated by trigonometric rows: Inserting the results of this table into equation (5) from the previous tablewe get a system of ordinary differential equations: University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  32. Systematic approach for the development of differential equations for a plate University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  33. x dx dx p(x,y) dy dy z, w(x,y) dx mx my x x dy y h/2 Shearing stress Shear force h/2 dx dx dy dy qx qy xz yz Torsion with shear Torsional moment dx dx dy dy mxy myx xy yx Systematic approach for the development of differential equations for a plate Stress and internal force in plate element Equation of equilibrium Balanced forces in z-direction: Balanced moments for x- and y-axis: Equation of equilibrium after transformations: University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  34. Partial differential equation for a plate: This changes to an ordinary differential equation if the displacements are approximated by trigonometric rows. Inserting the results of the table in the above equation we get the ordinary differential equation: University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

  35. Conclusion: • MAPLE permits a fast calculation of stiffness matrices for different element types in symbolic form- Elaboration of stiffness matrices can be automated- Export of the results in other computer languages (C, C++, VB, Fortran) can help to implement stiffness matrices in different environments- For students‘ education an understanding of algorithms is essential to test different FE-formulations- Students can develop their own programmes for the FEM University of the German Armed Forces Munich Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringInstitute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural Mechanics / Laboratory of Engineering Informatics Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. N. Gebbeken

More Related