1 / 16

Iftekhar Hussain (ihussain@infinera) Abinder Dhillon (adhillon@infinera)

Generalized Label for Super-Channel Assignment on Flexible Grid draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-03 IETF 83 - Paris, France March 25 - 31, 2012. Iftekhar Hussain (ihussain@infinera.com) Abinder Dhillon (adhillon@infinera.com) Zhong Pan (zpan@infinera.com)

germane-craft
Télécharger la présentation

Iftekhar Hussain (ihussain@infinera) Abinder Dhillon (adhillon@infinera)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Generalized Label for Super-Channel Assignment on Flexible Griddraft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-03IETF 83 - Paris, FranceMarch 25 - 31, 2012 Iftekhar Hussain (ihussain@infinera.com) Abinder Dhillon (adhillon@infinera.com) Zhong Pan (zpan@infinera.com) Marco Sosa (msosa@infinera.com) Bert Basch (bert.e.basch@verizon.com) Steve Liu (steve.liu@verizon.com) Andrew G. Malis (andrew.g.malis@verizon.com)

  2. Agenda Changes since IETF-82 Open Issues Next Steps draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-03

  3. Changes • Ver-02 to Ver-03 • Modified • Changed the term “group” to “slot”in the n_start and n_end fields in the label • Added (similar to RFC4328) • a new G-PID type = OTUadapt • See (ITU-T SG15, Contribution C1573r1, Dec 2011 (Geneva)) • a new G-PID value to be assigned by IANA • A new Switching Type = Super-Channel-Switch-Capable(SCSC) • See draft-dhillon-ccamp-super-channel-ospfte-ext) • LSP Encoding Type = Lambda (as defined in RFC4328) draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-03

  4. Proposal - Summary • Extends [RFC3471] [RFC6205] • Defines a new generalized label format for super-channels assignment on flex-grid networks • Super-Channel Label extensions summary • Allows label assignment for both Contiguous Spectrum and Split-Spectrum Super-Channels • Provides two encoding options for the label • List/Range (n_start, n_end) • Bitmap draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-03

  5. Open issues • Terminology clarifications • Framework document submitted with definitions & use cases • WG agreement on Control Plane requirements • Alignment with ITU docs on data plane aspects draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-03

  6. Next Steps Requesting for review and comments Discuss merge options with other contributions draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-label-03

  7. Super-Channel Optical Parameters GMPLS Signaling Extensionsdraft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00IETF 83 - Paris, FranceMarch 25 - 31, 2012 Iftekhar Hussain (ihussain@infinera.com) Vinayak Dangui (vdangui@infinera.com) Michael VanLeeuwen(MVanleeuwen@infinera.com) Marco Sosa (msosa@infinera.com)

  8. Agenda Motivation Extensions Summary TLV Summary Use Case Open Issues Next Steps draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00

  9. Motivation Coexistence of super-channels using different modulation formats Adjacent super-channels may affect each other detrimentally Desirable to evaluate the mutual impact of the existing and new super-channels on each other's quality of transmission draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00 9

  10. Extensions Summary • This draft defines GMPLS signaling extensions to convey following super-channel optical parameters: • Number of Carriers • Carrier Center Frequency (THz) • Carrier Modulation • Carrier Baudrate (Gbit/s) • Carrier FEC Type draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00 10

  11. TLVs Summary • Defines following new TLVs • Super-Channel Carriers TLV • Carrier sub-TLV Carrier • Carrier Center Frequency sub-sub-TLV • Carrier Modulation sub-sub-TLV • Carrier FEC sub-sub-TLV • Two options to carry these TLVs • Option 1 • RSVP FLOWSPEC or TSPEC Object • Option 2 (add in next revision) • With the Super-Channel Label draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00 11

  12. Super-Channel Carrier TL and Sub-TLVs draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00 12

  13. Carrier Center Frequency, Modulation, and FEC sub-sub-TLV draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00 13

  14. Use Case • Signal optical parameters of the super-channel in the RSVP message using proposed TLVs • Each node along the super-channel setup path allocates the required number of slices and learns the associated set of signaled parameters. • Each node advertises this information to other nodes in the network using routing extensions (see draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-ospfte) to apply added constraints draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00 14

  15. Open issues • Terminology clarifications • Framework document submitted with definitions & use cases • WG agreement on Control Plane requirements • Alignment with ITU docs on data plane aspects draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00

  16. Next Steps Requesting for review and comments Discuss merge options with other contributions draft-hussain-ccamp-super-channel-param-sig-00

More Related