de Paz ( PhD ), A. Chotia , B. Laburthe-Tolra , E. Maréchal, L. Vernac ,

1. DipolarchromiumBECs • de Paz (PhD), A. Chotia, B. Laburthe-Tolra, • E. Maréchal, L. Vernac, • P. Pedri (Theory), • O. Gorceix (Group leader) Have left: B. Pasquiou (PhD), G. Bismut (PhD), M. Efremov , Q. Beaufils, J. C. Keller, T. Zanon, R. Barbé, A. Pouderous, R. Chicireanu Collaborator:Anne Crubellier (Laboratoire Aimé Cotton)

2. R Chromium (S=3): Van-der-Waals plus dipole-dipole interactions Dipole-dipole interactions Long range Anisotropic Relative strength of dipole-dipole and Van-der-Waals interactions Cr:

3. BEC stable despite attractive part of dipole-dipole interactions BEC collapses R Relative strength of dipole-dipole and Van-der-Waals interactions Stuttgart: Tune contact interactions using Feshbach resonances (Nature. 448, 672 (2007)) Anisotropic explosion pattern reveals dipolar coupling. Stuttgart: d-wave collapse, PRL 101, 080401 (2008) See also Er PRL, 108, 210401 (2012) See also Dy, PRL, 107, 190401 (2012) … and Dy Fermi sea PRL, 108, 215301 (2012) Cr:

4. Hydrodynamic properties of a BEC with weak dipole-dipole interactions Striction Stuttgart, PRL 95, 150406 (2005) Collective excitations Villetaneuse, PRL 105, 040404 (2010) Anisotropic speed of sound Bragg spectroscopy Villetaneuse arXiv: 1205.6305 (2012) Interesting but weak effects in a scalar Cr BEC

5. R Dipolar interactions introduce magnetization-changing collisions without with 1 0 Dipole-dipole interactions -1 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3

6. B=0: Rabi 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 In a finite magnetic field: Fermi golden rule (losses) (x1000 compared to alkalis)

7. Dipolar relaxation, rotation, and magnetic field 3 2 1 0 -1 Angular momentum conservation -2 -3 Rotate the BEC ? Spontaneous creation of vortices ? Einstein-de-Haas effect Important to control magnetic field Ueda, PRL 96, 080405 (2006) Santos PRL 96, 190404 (2006) Gajda, PRL 99, 130401 (2007) B. Sun and L. You, PRL 99, 150402 (2007)

8. 3 2 1 0 • B=1G • Particleleaves the trap -1 -2 -3 • B=10 mG • Energy gain matches band excitation in a lattice • B=.1 mG • Energy gain equals to chemicalpotential in BEC

9. S=3 Spinor physics with free magnetization • New featureswith Cr: • S=3 spinor (7 Zeeman states, four scatteringlengths, a6, a4, a2, a0) • No hyperfine structure • Free magnetization • Magneticfieldmatters ! • Alkalis : • - S=1 and S=2 only • - Constant magnetization • (exchange interactions) • Linear Zeeman effectirrelevant Technical challenges : Good control of magnetic field needed (down to 100 mG) Active feedback with fluxgate sensors Low atom number – 10 000 atoms in 7 Zeeman states

10. S=3 Spinor physics with free magnetization • New featureswith Cr: • S=3 spinor (7 Zeeman states, four scatteringlengths, a6, a4, a2, a0) • No hyperfine structure • Free magnetization • Magneticfieldmatters ! • Alkalis : • - S=1 and S=2 only • - Constant magnetization • (exchange interactions) • Linear Zeeman effectirrelevant • 1 Spinorphysics of a Bose gaswith free magnetization • Thermodynamics: how magnetizationdepends on temperature • Spontaneousdepolarization of the BEC due to spin-dependent interactions • 2 Magnetism in opicallattices • Depolarizedground state atlowmagneticfield • Spin and magnetizationdynamics

11. 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 Spin temperature equilibriates with mechanical degrees of freedom At low magnetic field: spin thermally activated -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 We measure spin-temperature by fitting the mS population (separated by Stern-Gerlach technique)

12. Spontaneous magnetization due to BEC T>Tc T<Tc -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 a bi-modal spin distribution Thermal population in Zeeman excited states BEC only in mS=-3 (lowest energy state) Cloud spontaneously polarizes ! Non-interacting multicomponent Bose thermodynamics: a BEC is ferromagnetic Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 045307 (2012)

13. Below a critical magnetic field: the BEC ceases to be ferromagnetic ! B=100 µG B=900 µG • Magnetization remains small even when the condensate fraction approaches 1 • !! Observation of a depolarized condensate !! Necessarily an interaction effect Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 045307 (2012)

14. Cr spinor properties at low field -1 3 3 2 2 1 1 -2 0 0 -1 -1 -2 -2 -3 -3 -3 Large magnetic field : ferromagnetic Low magnetic field : polar/cyclic Santos PRL 96, 190404 (2006) Ho PRL. 96, 190405 (2006) -2 -3 Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 255303 (2011)

15. Density dependent threshold Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 255303 (2011) Load into deep 2D optical lattices to boost density. Field for depolarization depends on density Note: Possible new physics in 1D: Polar phase is a singlet-paired phase Shlyapnikov-Tsvelik NJP, 13, 065012 (2011)

16. Produce BEC m=-3 Rapidly lower magnetic field Dynamics analysis PRL 106, 255303 (2011) Meanfield picture : Spin(or) precession Ueda, PRL 96, 080405 (2006) Natural timescale for depolarization:

17. Open questions about equilibrium state Phases set by contact interactions, magnetizationdynamics set by dipole-dipole interactions Santos and Pfau PRL 96, 190404 (2006) Diener and Ho PRL. 96, 190405 (2006) Magnetic field Demler et al., PRL 97, 180412 (2006) • - Operate near B=0. Investigate absolute many-body ground-state • We do not (cannot ?) reach those new ground state phases • Quench should induce vortices… • Role of thermal excitations ? Cyclic Polar !! Depolarized BEC likely in metastable state !!

18. 1 Spinorphysics of a Bose gaswith free magnetization • Thermodynamics: Spontaneousmagnetization of the gas due to ferromagnetic nature of BEC • Spontaneousdepolarization of the BEC due to spin-dependent interactions • 2 Magnetism in 3D opicallattices • Depolarizedground state atlowmagneticfield • Spin and magnetizationdynamics

19. Spontaneous demagnetization of atoms in a 3D lattice -2 -3

20. Control the ground state by a light-induced effective Quadratic Zeeman effect 1 0 -1 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Energy A s- polarized laser Close to a JJ transition (100 mW 427.8 nm) -2 -3 D=a mS2 In practice, a p component couples mS states Typical groundstate at 60 kHz Quadratic effect allows state preparation

21. Adiabatic (reversible) change in magnetic state (unrelated to dipolar interactions) quadratic effect t -3 -2 3D lattice (1 atom per site) Note: the spin state reached without a 3D lattice is completely different ! Large spin-dependent (contact) interactions in the BEC have a very large effect on the final state -1 -2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -3 BEC (no lattice)

22. Magnetization dynamics in lattice (with 1 atom per site) Load optical lattice quadratic effect vary time Repolarization remains even with very few atoms Sign for intersite dipolar relaxation ?

23. Magnetization dynamics resonance for two atoms per site 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 Dipolar resonance when released energy matches band excitation Towards coherent excitation of pairs into higher lattice orbitals ? (Rabi oscillations) Mott state locally coupled to excited band Resonance sensitive to atom number

24. Strong anisotropy of dipolar resonances Anisotropic lattice sites At resonance May produce vortices in each lattice site (EdH effect) (problem of tunneling) See also PRL 106, 015301 (2011)

25. Conclusions Magnetization changing dipolar collisions introduce the spinor physics with free magnetization New spinor phases at extremely low magnetic fields Tensor light-shift allow to reach new quantum phases 0D Control of dipolar relaxation in optical lattices magnetization dynamics in optical lattices can be made resonant could be made coherent ? towards Einstein-de-Haas (rotation in lattice sites)

26. de Paz, A. Chotia, B. Pasquiou (PhD), G. Bismut (PhD), • B. Laburthe, E. Maréchal, L. Vernac, • P. Pedri, M. Efremov, O. Gorceix