1 / 35

Supercritical Accretion in the Evolution of Neutron Star Binaries and Its Implications

QCS2014@2014.10.20. Supercritical Accretion in the Evolution of Neutron Star Binaries and Its Implications. Nuclear Physics A 928 (2014) 296. Chang-Hwan Lee @. ( 李昌桓 ). All well measured NS masses in NS-NS binaries are < 1.5 Msun. Prakash (2013). Our open questions.

giacomo-birney
Télécharger la présentation

Supercritical Accretion in the Evolution of Neutron Star Binaries and Its Implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. QCS2014@2014.10.20 Supercritical Accretion in the Evolution ofNeutron Star Binaries and Its Implications Nuclear Physics A 928 (2014) 296 Chang-Hwan Lee @ (李昌桓)

  2. All well measured NS masses in NS-NS binaries are < 1.5 Msun Prakash (2013)

  3. Our open questions High-mass neutron stars in NS-White Dwarf binaries 1.97 solar mass NS : Nature 467 (2010) 1081 2.01 solar mass NS : Science 340 (2013) 6131 • 1.97 & 2.01 Msun NS were observed in NS-WD binaries • Why all well-measured NS masses in NS-NS binaries are less than 1.5 Msun? •  NS mass may/should depend on the evolution process

  4. Contents Part I : What we discovered in BH binaries Part II : What if we apply the same evolution process to neutron star binaries ?

  5. Part I. What we discovered in BH binaries ApJ 575, 996 (2002)

  6. Black Hole Binaries (Soft X-ray Transients) Main Sequence companion   Evolved companion MBH (Msun) Orbital period (days)

  7. Q) How can we understandthe population of SXTs ? Progenitors Q1) Evolution of BH/NS Progenitor Q2) What happens at birth ? Q3) Evolution of Donor Star Current Observation

  8. Tidal interaction just before BH formation rapidlyspinning BH Fe Synchronization of BH-Progenitor Spin & Binary Orbital Period

  9. Reconstructed BH Binaries at Birth

  10. Rapidly spinning black holes at birth ApJ 575, 996 (2002) Pre-explosion orbital period (days)

  11. Rapidly spinning black holes at birth 4U 1543-47GRO J1655-40 Shafee et al. (2006) Pre-explosion orbital period (days)

  12. Kerr parameters & Energies involved ApJ 727:29 (2011)

  13. Part II What if we apply the same evolution process to neutron star binaries ? • Supercritical accretion in NS binaries • Possibilities of `NS + high-mass NS/BH` binaries

  14. Eddington Luminosity & Eddington Limit

  15. Supercritical Accretion onto first-born NS • Eddington Accretion Rate : photon pressure balances the gravitation attraction • If this limit holds, neutron star cannot be formed from the beginning (e.g. SN1987A; 108Eddington Limit). • Neutrinos can take the pressure out of the system allowing the supercritical accretion when accretion rateis bigger than 104Eddington limit ! (T > 1 MeV : Thermal neutrinos dominates !) Q) What is the implications of supercritical accretion, ifit works ?

  16. One has to understand formation of BH/NS BH or NS Giant Star

  17. Fe core mass before collapse (Brown et al. New Aston. 6,457) ? J1614-2230 Neutron Star Open Box & Circles: in close Binaries

  18. ApJ 670:741 (2007) • In 2007 • we discussed that NS masses in NS-NS binaries may be the result of evolution, not an indication of maximum NS mass. • We discussed the possibility that the maximum mass of NS can be significantly higher than 1.5 solar mass.

  19. Fresh NS mass from Fe core collapse In close binaries (evolution without H envelope) low Fe core mass NS mass = 1.3 - 1.5 Msun This value is independent of NS equation of state. Q) What is the fate of primary (first-born) NS in binaries ?

  20. Final fate of first-born NS Accretion NS + accretion 1st-born NS Fe 2ndNS/WD He Evolution of Companion

  21. Case 1 A NS Life time NS B H He A He H B No accretion : nearly equal mass NS-NS binary!

  22. Case 2 H red giant He red giant A NS Life time NS B H A He B +0.2 Msun First born NS should accrete only < 0.2 M⊙ !

  23. Case3 H red giant He red giant A NS Life time 90% 10% WD B A H He He B +0.2 Msun +0.7 Msun Supercritical Accretion: First born NS can accrete up to 0.9 M⊙ !

  24. Possibilities of `typical NS` + `high-mass NS/BH` binaries

  25. How mass & orbit change during the evolution? A few efficiencies (not calculable from first principles) cd=6, ce=0.2 are consistent with SXT(Soft X-ray Transient)Lee,Brown,Wijers,ApJ(2002) Belczynski et al., ApJ, 572, 407

  26. Final mass of first-born NS with supercritical accretion observed observed

  27. Can we see BH-NS binaries as pulsars even if they exist ? Pulsar life time : 1/B Fresh pulsar : B∼1012G • NS-NS if first-born NS is recycled by accretion  longer pulsar life time(B∼108 G)  larger beaming angle  biggerchances to be observed • BH-NS no recycled pulsar much smaller chances to be observed

  28. GW sources with NS • NS-NS – already seen • NS-BH/HMNS – no evidence yet– can contribute to GW if exist

  29. Consequences of supercritical accretion, if it works • different class of NS binaries may exist`high mass NS/BH ( > 2 solar mass)` + `typical NS` • could be hidden GW sources

  30. Nature 514, 202 (9 Oct. 2014) Courtesy of Hao Tong

  31. Many Thanks

  32. Uncertainties [4U 1543-47] Preconstructed Shafee et al. (2006) 4U 1543-47 Pcurrent arXiv:1408.7028 Pre-explosion orbital period (days)

  33. Evolution after BH formation

  34. GRS 1915+105 Spin-up due to conservative accretion Low-spin black holes at birth

  35. McClintock et al. (2006) GRS 1915+105a* > 0.98 Pre-explosion orbital period (days)

More Related