90 likes | 225 Vues
This document explores the processes and rights surrounding the modification and revocation of trusts under Texas law. It outlines the powers of the Settlor, Trustee, and Beneficiaries, detailing how a trust can be revoked or amended. The Settlor can modify the trust with specific language, while the Trustee generally lacks such power unless granted by the Settlor. Beneficiaries can act together to modify trusts under certain conditions. The text also discusses court approval requirements and the judicial perspective on family settlements.
E N D
1. By the Settlor -- § 112.051 • Presumption = Settlor may revoke, modify, amend, etc. • Settlor can make trust irrevocable by express language. • Tax benefits • Beneficiary protection • Creditor protection
1. By the Settlor -- § 112.051 • Revocation Methods • In writing, if trust created in writing. • Sanderson – p. 166 (allowed revocation language to be in a will). • Follow method settlor specified in the trust.
2. By the Trustee • Generally, no power to modify. • Possible situations: • Settlor granted power in the trust. • Division or combination of trusts on identical terms -- § 112.057 • Non-judicial cy pres -- § 113.026
3. By Trustee and Beneficiaries Acting Together • Merger -- § 112.034 • But, no merger of spendthrift trust unless settlor is the beneficiary.
4. By Beneficiaries • General U.S. Rule = Allowed as long as no material trust purpose remained unfulfilled (Claflin rule).
4. By Beneficiaries • Texas under Frost Nat’l Bank v. Newton (Tex. 1977) = Allowed only if all purposes satisfied. • Texas under § 112.054(a)(5) if: • Obtain court approval, • Change not inconsistent with material purpose, and • All beneficiaries agree or are deemed to have agreed.
5. Settlor and All Beneficiaries • Musick v. Reynolds – p. 170, 173 • “[I]f a settlor of a trust is alive and all of the beneficiaries of an irrevocable spendthrift trust consent * * *, the settlor and all beneficiaries may consent to a modification or termination of the trust.”
6. Family Settlements • Favored by courts on public policy grounds. • But, courts make certain controversy is genuine.