1 / 70

Principles of Radiographic Interpretation Juan F. Yepes DDS , MD, MPH Assistant Professor

Principles of Radiographic Interpretation Juan F. Yepes DDS , MD, MPH Assistant Professor Division of Oral Diagnosis, Oral Medicine and Oral Radiology University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry Spring 2009. What is that radiologist saying?. Well defined and Corticated….. .

gilon
Télécharger la présentation

Principles of Radiographic Interpretation Juan F. Yepes DDS , MD, MPH Assistant Professor

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Principles of Radiographic Interpretation Juan F. Yepes DDS, MD, MPH Assistant Professor Division of Oral Diagnosis, Oral Medicine and Oral Radiology University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry Spring 2009

  2. What is that radiologist saying? Well defined and Corticated…..

  3. General Objective • The objective of this lecture is to provide step-by-step- analytic process • that can be applied to the interpretation of diagnostic images. • Proficiency comes with PRACTICE!!! • Radiographic interpretation of caries • Radiographic interpretation of periodontal disease • Radiographic interpretation of benign conditions • Radiographic interpretation of malignant conditions

  4. Some definitions….

  5. Radiopaque This refers to the item that is being imaged, i.e. in our case a part of the patient, and means that it blocks the transmission of x rays.

  6. Radiolucent This refers to the item that is being imaged, i.e. in our case a part of the patient, and means that it permits the transmission of x rays.

  7. Dense (Density) In radiology this usually refers to the film, and refers to the ability of the film to block the transmission of light (i.e. blackness)

  8. Well localized The item being reported is limited to a specific area, and does not extend beyond that locality.

  9. Well localized

  10. Poorly localized The item being reported is not limited to a specific area, and extends into surrounding anatomical sites.

  11. Poorly localized

  12. Well defined The edges of the item being reported are reasonably sharp and clearly define the extent of the lesion.

  13. Well defined

  14. Poorly defined The edges of the item being reported are not sharp. The actual borders and thus the exact extent of the lesion are not clearly defined.

  15. Poorly defined

  16. The lesion may thus be well localized and well defined or well localized, but poorly defined or poorly localized and poorly defined but generally not poorly localized and well defined

  17. Corticated The entity being reported is not only well defined, but has a cortex, i.e. an osseous border, seen as a thin white line.

  18. Corticated

  19. Multilocular The entity being reported is usually well defined and has a cortex, i.e. an osseous border, seen as a thin white line, but is partially or totally subdivided into several loculi.

  20. Multilocular Loculus, loculi: the diminutive of locus. Locus, loci: a place or position

  21. Multilocular Thus, multilocular implies several small places. As we use it, they are joined places.

  22. Multilocular

  23. Osteitis vs Osteomyelitis Both terms mean that there is inflammation of bone.

  24. Osteitis inflammation of bone, involving the haversian spaces, canals, and their branches, and generally the medullary cavity, and marked by enlargement of the bone, tenderness, and a dull aching pain. Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary 29th ed.

  25. Osteomyelitis inflammation of bone caused by infection, usually by a pyogenic organism, although any infectious agent may be involved. It may remain localized or may spread through the bone to involve the marrow, cortex, cancellous tissue, and periosteum. Dorland’s Illustrated Medical Dictionary 29th ed.

  26. Osteitis inflammation of bone that remains localized, and may be more of a painful inconvenience

  27. Osteitis

  28. Osteomyelitis

  29. Osteitis Rarefying Osteitis Sclerosing Osteitis

  30. Rarefying Osteitis(Periapical lesion U. of K.) Inflammation of bone that results in the removal of bone. The term is not a diagnosis, but a radiologic interpretation that includes abscess, cyst and granuloma.

  31. Rarefying Osteitis (periapical lesion at UK)

  32. Sclerosing Osteitis I use the term sclerosingosteitis, i.e. inflammation of bone (osteitis) that causes sclerosis.

  33. Sclerosing (or condensing) Osteitis

  34. Sclerosing Osteitis

  35. Periosteal Reaction Any involvement of the periosteum by a pathological process that results in the deposition of periosteal new bone.

  36. Inflammation of the Jaws and Periosteal Reactions Sessile Osteomyelitis Periostitis Healing Orthogonal Anemia Sarcoma Sarcoma

  37. Periapical Radiolucency This is merely a description of a finding, and should better be stated as a periapical radiolucent area or line. It does not denote disease. e.g. the maxillary sinus could be a periapical radiolucent area, as could the mental foramen.

  38. What is that radiologist really saying? Well defined and Corticated

  39. Well localized

  40. Well localized The radiologist infers that the appearance is consistent with a slow non-invasive growth, and thus that this is benign.

  41. Poorly localized

  42. Poorly localized The radiologist infers that the appearance is consistent with a faster and invasive growth, and thus that this is malignant, or a spreading infectious/inflammatory lesion.

  43. Well defined

  44. Well defined The radiologist infers that the appearance is consistent with a slow non-invasive growth, and thus that this is benign.

  45. Poorly defined

  46. Poorly defined The radiologist infers that the appearance is consistent with invasive growth, and thus that this is malignant, or infectious/ inflammatory lesion.

  47. Corticated

  48. Corticated The radiologist infers that the appearance is consistent with a slow non-invasive growth, and thus that this is benign.

  49. Multilocular

More Related