1 / 13

ED 578 fall 2010

ED 578 fall 2010. Review of Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 and 3 Discussion. Historical View. INSPECTORS SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENTA– TAYLOR DEMOCRATIC METHOD – DEWEY SCIENTIFIC METHOD - BARR LEADERSHIP EMERGES CLINIICAL SUPERVISION INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP STANDARDS-BASED. Review of Chapter 1.

giolla
Télécharger la présentation

ED 578 fall 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ED 578fall 2010 Review of Chapter 1 & Chapter 2 and 3 Discussion

  2. Historical View INSPECTORS SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENTA– TAYLOR DEMOCRATIC METHOD – DEWEY SCIENTIFIC METHOD - BARR LEADERSHIP EMERGES CLINIICAL SUPERVISION INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP STANDARDS-BASED

  3. Review of Chapter 1 “Supervision lacks focus largely due to the lack of research and continuing disagreement on the definition and purposes of supervision” Alfonso & Firth (p.180), Instructional Supervision

  4. Two Essential Questions What is your definition of supervision? What is your belief system as it relates to supervision?

  5. Definition of Supervision The authors (Sullivan & Glanz) view supervision as the center for the improvement of instruction. “Supervision is the process of engaging teacher in dialogue for the purpose of improving teaching and increasing achievement” (p. 4)

  6. CHAPTER 2 – Interpersonal Approaches to Supervision How do the four interpersonal approaches to supervision in Chapter 2 relate to and support Sullivan and Glanz definition of supervision? • Directive Control • Directive Informational • Collaborative • Self-Directed

  7. Connecting Models Compare and Contrast the Interpersonal Approaches in Sullivan and Glanz with the Hersey and Blanchard Model for Situational Leadership, which was discussed in ED 517.

  8. Moving Toward Your Definition of Supervision (page 35) Sullivan & Glanz Think About… 1. Factors that influenced our professional work 2. Your views, beliefs, and vision of the way a school should be (climate & culture) 3. Support your ideas with examples from literature

  9. Chapter 3 – Observation Tools and Techniques Quantitative vs. Qualitative Latte Qualitative Quantitative Robust aroma 12 Ounces Frothy Appearance Serving Temp 150 Strong Taste Cost $4.95

  10. Tools & Techniques Now that you have reviewed the 32 Tools and Techniques in Chapter 3 of Sullivan and Glanz, what type of tool and/or technique would best support you and your definition of supervision? -Construct support for your answer-

  11. Putting it All Together (ch. 1) What is your definition and what is your belief system that supports your definition? (ch. 2) What approach and interpersonal skills will you utilize to support you through the supervision process? (ch. 3) What tools and techniques will you utilized to support you through the supervision process?

  12. Tools & Techniques Now that you have reviewed the 32 Tools and Techniques in Chapter 3 of Sullivan and Glanz, what type of tool and/or technique would best support you and your definition of supervision? -Construct support for your answer-

  13. A well designed teacher evaluation system is a powerful tool to ensure quality teaching and promote professional learning. As a member of a committee to review the district’s Supervision Plan, you have been asked to present your ideas. Your plan should reflect your vision of supervision as well as address: • The needs of the teachers and the district • The components of your system • The rationale for your choices

More Related