Analyzing a Court Decision
50 likes | 178 Vues
This presentation analyzes significant court decisions impacting education service providers and tuition tax credits. It covers the School District of Wilkinsburg v. Wilkinsburg Education Association case, where the court affirmed the legality of school boards entering contracts with education service providers under Pennsylvania law amidst concerns of teacher furloughs. Additionally, it discusses tuition tax credit cases like Mueller v. Allen and Kotterman v. Killian, which upheld tax law provisions benefiting both private and public schools without violating the Establishment Clause. These rulings underscore the constitutional obligation for a thorough public education system.
Analyzing a Court Decision
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Analyzing a Court Decision An overview of Education Service Providers/Tuition Tax Credits presented by Bart Fennemore
Education Service Providers • Case: School District of Wilkinsburg v. Wilknisburg Education Association • Court: 667 A.2d 5 (Pa. 1995) • Teachers union sues school board for its contract with an Education Service Provider that would cause 24 teachers to be furloughed • Issue • NCLB requires failing schools to arrange for supplemental help from such providers
Education Service Providers • Holding • PA Public School Code allows the school board to enter into such contracts • Significance • A “constitutionally required ‘thorough and efficient system of public education’” outweighs your job
Tuition Tax Credits • Case: Mueller v. Allen • Court: 463 U.S. 388 (1983) • Minnesota tax law, an allowable deduction, upheld because it was indiscriminate of who it benefited. • See page 98 (also in another presentation of mine) • Case: Kotterman v. Killian • Court: 972 P.2d 606 (Ariz. 1999) • Taxpayers were allowed to contribute up to $500 to private /$200 to public schools and claim the amount against state taxes. • No violation to the Establishment Clause • Not a violation of the antigift clause of the state constitution
Tuition Tax Credits • Case: Winn v. Hibbs • Court: 361 F.Supp. 2d 1117 (Ariz. 2005) • All taxpayers given the option to contribute up to $500 to a “student tuition organization” as a tax credit. • 91% of time the STO was a private religious school. • Did not violate Establishment Clause • Zelman case cited