1 / 10

Network of Excellence Benchmark

The NoEBenchmark initiative highlights key challenges faced in evaluating 3D angular orientation in technology. Although the community embraced the challenge, it was not born from it, leading to issues such as a black box evaluation mechanism and lack of standardized interchange formats. Future benchmarks should involve well-defined tasks and datasets proposed by the community, transparent evaluation methods, and a competitive yet healthy environment. By learning from past experiences, we can promote continual improvement and innovation in the field.

glen
Télécharger la présentation

Network of Excellence Benchmark

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Network of Excellence Benchmark Carlos Oscar Sorzano Techn. Director I2PC Natl. Center Biotechnology (CSIC)

  2. NoEBenchmark

  3. NoEBenchmark • Therewas a definedtask. • The communityacceptedthechallenge. • The result of thechallengecouldhaveserved as a startingpointtoimprove3D angular orientation.

  4. NoEBenchmark • The challengedidnotarisefromthecommunity: althoughthecommunityacceptedit.

  5. NoEBenchmark • Evaluationwas a black box: theevaluation Figure of Meritwasunknown a priori.

  6. NoEBenchmark • Therewasnota clearinterchangestandard: therewas no way of testingthatthesubmittedresultswhereactually in thecorrectformat, coordinatesystem, Euler signs, …

  7. NoEBenchmark • Therewas a single dataset: therewas no exploration of differentpackagesperformingbetterunderdifferentcircumstances.

  8. NoEBenchmark • Egos weretoohigh

  9. NoEBenchmark • Itwas a single shot. 1891: 10.8s 1906: 10.6s 1911: 10.5s 1924: 10.4s : 10.3s 1936: 10.2s … 2009: 9.58s

  10. For futurebenchmarks • Welldefinedtask. • Welldefinedinterchangeformat. • Taskproposedbythecommunity. • Differentdatasets. • Transparentevaluation with pre-test datasets. • Acceptance of competition as a healthywaytoimprove. • Possibilitytowithdrawfromcompetition. • Competitionsshould be repeatedover time.

More Related