1 / 51

Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education

Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services. Children & Students w/IEPs Age Groups. Children with IEPs Ages 3-5 1997 – 2010. Source: Annual Special Education Child Count.

glyn
Télécharger la présentation

Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data Slides for Children & Students with IEPs in 2010 Michigan Department of Education Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services

  2. Children & Students w/IEPs Age Groups

  3. Children with IEPs Ages 3-51997 – 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  4. Students With IEPs Ages 6-211997 – 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  5. Students With IEPs Ages 22-261996 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  6. Students with IEPs Ages 22 – 26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  7. Number of Students with IEPs Ages 13 - 21 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  8. Students with IEPs Ages 6 - 12 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  9. Students with IEPs Ages 3 - 5 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  10. Students with IEPs by Age Groups in 2010 Age Groups Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  11. Identification Rates By Eligibility

  12. Special Education Eligibility1997 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  13. Identification Rates By Eligibilityin 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  14. Identification Rates By Eligibilityin 2010 SLD SLI CI OHI EI ASD ECDD PI SXI HI VI TBI D/B Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  15. Trends in Disability Categories 1992-2010

  16. Cognitive Impairment1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  17. Emotional Impairment1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  18. Physical and Other Health Impairments1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  19. Early Childhood Developmental Delay 1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  20. Severe Multiple Impairment1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  21. Visual Impairment1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  22. Hearing Impairment1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  23. Speech and Language Impairment1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  24. Physical (PI) & Other Health Impairments (OHI) 1991 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  25. Specific Learning Disability1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  26. Specific Learning Disability EligibilityAge Groups 2002 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  27. Autism Spectrum Disorder1992 - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  28. Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2008 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  29. Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2009 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  30. Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  31. Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age - 2008 through 2010 Compared Number of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder by Age – 2008, 2009 and 2010 Compared Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  32. Race/Ethnicity for Students w/IEPs

  33. Race/Ethnicity Ages 3-26in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  34. Gender for Students with IEPs

  35. Gender by Age Groups in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  36. Gender Distribution of Students with IEPs Ages 3-26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  37. Educational Environments for Students with IEPs

  38. Educational EnvironmentStudents with IEPs Ages 3 – 5 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  39. Educational EnvironmentStudents with IEPs Ages 6-12 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  40. Educational EnvironmentStudents with IEPs Ages 13-21 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  41. Educational EnvironmentStudents with IEPs Ages 6-21 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  42. Educational Environment Students with IEPs Ages 22 – 26 in 2010 Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  43. State Performance Plan Indicator Performance

  44. *Calculations using Cohort Four-Year Graduation Rate Methodology and using OSEP’s Prescribed One Year Data Lag Graduation* for Students with IEPsTarget is 80% Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  45. *Calculation using Consolidated State Performance ReportEvent Dropout Rate Methodology, and using OSEP’s Prescribed One Year Data Lag. Dropout* for Students with IEPsTarget is <10% Source: Annual Special Education Child Count

  46. Indicator 3A:AYP percent = [(# of districts with a disability subgroup that meets the State’s minimum “n” size that meet the State’s AYP targets for the disability subgroup) divided by the (total # of districts that have a disability subgroup that meets the State’s minimum “n” size)] times 100. Source: Michigan Department of Education, Bureau of Assessment and Accountability

  47. Indicator 4A:Rates of suspension and expulsion: Percent of districts identified by the State as having a significant discrepancy in the rates of suspensions and expulsions of children with disabilities for greater than 10 days in a school year. Source: Single Record Student Database, verification review *Definition of Significant Discrepancy: A district was identified as having a significant discrepancy in rates of suspensions and expulsions if more than five percent of its students with IEPs received out-of-school suspensions/expulsions for greater than 10 days cumulatively during the school year. Districts with fewer than five students with IEPs suspended/expelled for more than ten days were exempt from significant discrepancy calculations. This new protocol was reported in Michigan’s FFY 2008 State Performance Plan (SPP).

  48. Indicator 5A:Increase the percentage of students served inside the regular class 80% or more of the time. Source: Michigan Compliance Information System

  49. Indicator 9:Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Sources: Michigan Compliance Information System, Single Record Student Database, Michigan Student Data System

  50. Indicator 10:Percent of districts with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification. Sources: Michigan Compliance Information System, Single Record Student Database, Michigan Student Data System

More Related