1 / 17

Experience from working with WB in the area of Water Resources Management

Experience from working with WB in the area of Water Resources Management. Harsha Ratnaweera Director Business Development, NIVA- Norwegian Institute for Water Research Professor on Water & Wastewater Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås. NIVA.

graceland
Télécharger la présentation

Experience from working with WB in the area of Water Resources Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Experience from working with WB in the area of Water Resources Management Harsha Ratnaweera Director Business Development, NIVA- Norwegian Institute for Water Research Professor on Water & Wastewater Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås.

  2. NIVA • A private foundation, with 12% state grant • National centre for water related R&D • 200 empl.(120 specialists), USD 25 mill turnover • Experience from >60 countries, during 25 years • 15% are Development Projects

  3. Our priorities • In general, we follow the Norwegian national priorities • 80’s : Africa • Early 90’s: Eastern Europe • Late 90’s: Asia (China) • Early 2000’: Balkan • Development projects • 75% Norwegian funding • 10-15% World Bank • Size: • < 2 mln USD: Lead consultant • Bigger projects: Sub consultant to N- consulting companies.

  4. Our success in WB projects

  5. Why World Bank projects? • Water and Environment are priorities • Access to new markets • Access to an extraordinary knowledge base • Learning process to become more disciplined and attractive consultants • Attractive financing source, at times.

  6. Entrance • A relatively high threshold • Patience • Professionalism

  7. Competition • Competing with thousands of consultants and firms with • many years of professional experience, • Many years of country experience, • personal contacts, • government assistance, • Lot of marketing and lobbying resources • and networking.

  8. Role of Norwegian Authorities • Norwegian Trade Council until 2000 • Assist in arranging meetings • Following up with WB TMs • Facilitating relevant information • Norwegian Embassy since then: • Arranging the WB-N Forum • Assistance in arranging meetings

  9. Role of Norwegian Mechanisms • Norwegian Consultancy Trust Fund • 50% for N-Consultants, TM can request funding and often quickly and locally decided. • Good success • TF ESSD: • Financed by N, but with no restrictions. • Less success • Other TF: not much relevant for past projects

  10. Formalities • Need to register as a “Vendor” • Not sure what else are the benefits…

  11. Either in or out?? • Difficult to come in… • Once in, try to best, and better… • Second contract is easier… • Third is even more easier… • Personal contacts and references seems to mean a lot

  12. Dollar Factor • USD 500-600 independent consultant & USD 550-900 for a company per day. Note: there are companies who work gladly for USD 500-600/day !!

  13. Need for follow up • Need to be “visible” and “remembered” by TMs.. • Frequent visits • Emails/telephones (WB staff is more keen to reply to emails than NORAD)… • Frequent Bidding and applications • Dollar factor and the other markets unfortunately distract the attention to WB

  14. Even if the NOK/$ is low… • There are reasons to work with WB: • New markets : countries, regions • Networking & Contacts with new clients • Valuable references

  15. Bidding process • Projects funded by NORAD and MFA: often take months/years, and a heavy uncertainty • Bidding projects: relatively small, quick and predictable start-up • Difficult to find the suitable tender opportunities (local media..?)

  16. Conclusion • WB – still an attractive client/financier • Not only the direct remuneration -. But many indirect positive impacts • NIVA will look for a slight increase in WB projects

  17. Thank you

More Related