Advancing Corporate Sustainability: Insights from the 2006 International Sustainable Development Conference
The Third Annual International Sustainable Development Conference held in Perth, Scotland on November 15-16, 2006, presented critical insights into Triple-Bottom-Line (TBL) accounting for social, economic, and environmental indicators. Dr. Thomas Wiedmann and Prof. Manfred Lenzen highlighted the increasing reliance on corporate sustainability reports for investment and lending decisions. They addressed challenges in comparing sustainability metrics and emphasized the necessity for businesses to accurately report their direct and indirect environmental impacts using innovative life-cycle software tools for effective decision-making.
Advancing Corporate Sustainability: Insights from the 2006 International Sustainable Development Conference
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Third Annual International Sustainable Development Conference Sustainability – Creating the Culture 15-16 November 2006, Perth, Scotland Triple-Bottom-Line Accounting of Social, Economic and Environmental Indicators A New Life-Cycle Software Tool for UK businesses Dr Thomas Wiedmann Prof Manfred Lenzen
SD Reporting & TBL Accounting
“Corporate sustainability reports and sustainability ratings are increasingly used as key information for investment and lending decisions.” “There is a growing awareness that shareholders’ value is enhanced by increased corporate social and environmental responsibility.” World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2002)
Challenges remain… • “There is little comparability …” • “A key challenge remains reporting on the links between sustainability and the bottom line.” • “Business will increasingly be expected to report … on supplier- and consumer-related impacts of activities, products and services.” World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2002)
Reporting on direct and indirect KPIs • “The Government expects businesses to report on their significant environmental impacts whether they are direct or indirect.” • “Businesses are likely to derive benefit from positively influencing their indirect environmental impacts.” Trucost & Defra (May 2006)
Indirect (environmental) impacts Supply Chain Impacts (upstream) Direct Company Impacts (on-site) Downstream Impacts Energy Water Raw materials Logistics Boiler emissions Car fleet emissions Manufacturing emissions Landfill waste Recycling rate Products in use Product disposal Trucost & Defra (May 2006)
The problem of quantification • “… there is still a lack of quantification in most reporting. … the majority of reports lack depth, rigour or quantification.” • “Most business will have supply chain impacts that they should understand and consider reporting. There is no single, quantifiable measure that companies can use as a Key Performance Indicator for the effect of their upstream supply chain on the environment.” Trucost & Defra (May 2006)
SD Reporting Principles • Principle 1: quantitative • Principle 2: relevant & reliable • Principle 3: comparable • Principle 4: complete
TBL Accounting without boundaries
e.g. total emissions (direct plus indirect) e.g. direct (on-site) emissions e.g. purchases of a company
BottomLine3 A new TBL software tool
Two data inputs • Financial accounts • On-site impacts
Outputs • > 100 TBL indicators • Quantification of total (direct and indirect) impacts • Sector benchmarking • Structural path analysis • Production layer analysis
Production Layer Decomposition Energy demand (GJ) Company Suppliers of Suppliers Suppliers
THANK YOU www.bottomline3.co.uk www.isa-research.co.uk
