1 / 11

Federal Program Monitoring A Survivor’s Guide

Federal Program Monitoring A Survivor’s Guide. Presented by Lois Shaffer Director of Curriculum and Instruction / Interim Director of Special Services June 6, 2014. Funding. Supplement, Not Supplement. What helped most:. Attending the FPM Training Hearing from the reviewers themselves

gracie
Télécharger la présentation

Federal Program Monitoring A Survivor’s Guide

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Federal Program MonitoringA Survivor’s Guide Presented by Lois Shaffer Director of Curriculum and Instruction / Interim Director of Special Services June 6, 2014

  2. Funding Supplement, Not Supplement

  3. What helped most: • Attending the FPM Training • Hearing from the reviewers themselves • Getting an understanding of the requirements • Getting helpful ideas on clearing items • Becoming familiar with the CAIS system • Viewing the CAIS webinar • Becoming familiar with the monitored items

  4. What helped most: • Starting early • Time to take items to School Site Councils, Board of Trustees • Time to collect or create required items • Response time from reviewer • Tracking success; it feels so good!!!

  5. What helped most: • Developing working relationships with others • Site administration • Fiscal services department • Your FPM reviewers • Phone conversations- the reviewers really are helpful! • Your assistant!

  6. What I should have done differently: • Start on all monitored sections, instead of one at a time • Follow up with delegated “assignments” more often

  7. Notifications of findings • Reviewer posts that the item does not meet requirements • The reviewer explains what must occur to clear the item • 45 day timeline (calendar days) • Extension of 180 days can be requested

  8. The results (THEN vs. now) • 2011 • Uniform Complaint Procedures 1 finding • English Learner 13 findings • Career Technical Education No findings • Compensatory Education 17 findings • Total 31 findings

  9. The results (then vs. NOW) • 2014 • Uniform Complaint Procedures No findings • Physical Education No findings • English Learner 1 finding • Fiscal Monitoring No findings • Compensatory Education 1 finding • Total 2 findings

  10. How we are clearing those two items: • Both items involve the School Site Council updating their SPSA to show the SSC knew of additional funding • One item also includes bringing the updates SPSA to the Board of Trustees for approval • We will be requesting an extension of the due date to the fall • New SSC members chosen (September) • Updated SPSA approved at SSC meeting (October) • Updated SPSA approved at Board of Trustees meeting (December)

  11. Questions?

More Related