60 likes | 168 Vues
This case study highlights the collaboration between the Greater Holyoke YMCA and local stakeholders to improve community participation in policy-making. Key points include the need for effective communication between city government and residents, as outdated notification methods have limited engagement. A Public Rally Against the Waste Transfer Station underscored the importance of community feedback. The Walking Committee, composed of diverse representatives, has successfully prioritized infrastructure projects, such as bike lane studies and public park restorations, fostering sustainable change through active citizen involvement.
E N D
Holyoke MAPolicy Case Study Liz Budd Greater Holyoke YMCA Holyoke Food and Fitnes Policy council lbudd@holyokeymca.org
Hurdles Key Points • Communication between city government and Community • Notification Policies lack robust community participation response due to old solicitation methods. i.e tiny newspaper notices
Community & Policy Take Aways • Policies involving community input and notification are vital • Continual Community Feedback/input for future projects and long term infrastructure goals assures sustainable infrastructure change that is supported by the community Community participation is key for successful change
Outcomes Walking Committee • Collaborative committee of citizens, businesses, agencies and city planners and engineers that work together to identify and prioritize infrastructure needs in the city. Projects to date • Bike Lane study and proposal for city council • New intersection • Public Park restoration prioritization • Walking audit collaboration with local University