1 / 9

Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms (SCMs): An initial assessment of electricity and aluminium

Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms (SCMs): An initial assessment of electricity and aluminium. Jane Ellis and Richard Baron www.oecd.org/env/cc. COP/MOP1 - CPEQ WBCSD Side event Montréal, 7.12.05. Presentation outline. Why sectoral crediting mechanisms (SCMs)? Background

gratia
Télécharger la présentation

Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms (SCMs): An initial assessment of electricity and aluminium

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms (SCMs): An initial assessment of electricity and aluminium Jane Ellis and Richard Baron www.oecd.org/env/cc COP/MOP1 - CPEQ WBCSD Side event Montréal, 7.12.05

  2. Presentation outline • Why sectoral crediting mechanisms (SCMs)? • Background • Common SCM requirements • Aluminium sector insights • Electricity sector insights • Conclusions

  3. Background (1) • Why electricity and aluminium? • Have examined how SCMs that are rate-based, policy-based or fixed limits could work in each sector

  4. Background (2): three structures for SCMs • Policy-based • Evaluate and credit reductions pertaining to well-identified policies • Fixed limits • Fixed caps on sectors’ (and installations’) emissions • Rate-based • Baseline set in terms of t CO2-eq per unit of output • Critical issue: national or international-level baseline?

  5. Common themes Electricity Aluminium • Environmental effectiveness determined by SCM design (e.g. baseline level), rather than its structure (e.g. rate-based, policy-based) Baselines Eligibility Projections

  6. Initial insights: aluminium • International-level, rate-based mechanism most appropriate • This study: Focus on primary production • Issues to be resolved: • how to encourage participation? (voluntary agreements exist) • boundary definition (include electricity emissions?) • data availability for sector projections? • role of governments and linkages to national systems • fairness / perverse incentives/ leakage to other sectors

  7. National-level SCM seems most appropriate Fuel resources and power generation mix vary significantly (e.g. Brazil and China) Issues to be considered vary. For instance: Policy-based: ex-post estimates required to quantify CO2 reductions, as baseline could vary with sector’s development. Outcome hence uncertain for investors. Rate-based: various options exist for baselines (national average tCO2/MWh…) Fuel by fuel: discourages fuel switching, but takes local conditions into account. Does not encourage demand side energy efficiency. Fixed limit: less flexibility could lead to an agreement on a relatively high baseline (and the possibility of overly-generous allocation of credits) Initial insights: electricity

  8. Options for baselines (rate-based)

  9. SCM: Policy Challenges • Governance issues: • Who negotiates on behalf of sectors (especially if international agreements are envisioned)? • How to turn SCM into effective incentives at domestic level? • Interaction with existing mechanisms • CDM, Article 17 trading, EU ETS, other trading systems • Approval process: what can we learn from CDM?

More Related