1 / 19

Statistics

Statistics. Statistics = everything you need to know, but continually want to forget!!!!. DISEASE. TEST. Sensitivity . TP/TP + FN % of truly diseased patients who test positive PID = positive in disease. Specificity. TN/TN + FP % of truly non-diseased patients who test negative

griffin-collier
Télécharger la présentation

Statistics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Statistics

  2. Statistics = everything you need to know, but continually want to forget!!!!

  3. DISEASE TEST

  4. Sensitivity TP/TP + FN % of truly diseased patients who test positive PID = positive in disease

  5. Specificity TN/TN + FP % of truly non-diseased patients who test negative NIH = negative in health

  6. Positive Predictive Value TP/TP + FP % of patients having disease when test result is positive

  7. Negative Predictive Value TN/TN +FN % of patients with negative test and no disease

  8. PPV and NPV and prevalence • PPV and NPV greatly influenced by the prevalence of the disease • Increase the prevalence, increase the PPV, decrease the NPV • More common a disease is in the population, the more likely it is that a positive test will be a true positive

  9. How prevalence affects NPV & PPVAssume 80% sensitivity; 60% specificity

  10. Type I (alpha) error • Trial concludes treatment is effective when there is no effect = false positive • Standard 5% probability that difference seen in a trial due to chance alone • Causes of type I error are chance and unmeasured difference in treatment groups

  11. Type II (beta) error • Trial concludes treatment ineffective when an effect exists = false negative • Accepted level is 20% • Causes of type II error are small sample size

  12. Actual Treatment Effect

  13. Problem #1 • 400 patients studies for prostate CA • 200 pts identified by biopsy as having ca • All patients underwent PSA testing • 160 pts correctly identified as having prostate CA • 120 patients correctly identified as not having prostate CA

  14. Calculate • Sensitivity • Specificity • PPV • NPV

  15. Problem #2 • Assume the prevalence of colon CA in SD county is 3% of all pts >50 yrs • Hemmocult testing is 20% sensitive, 80% specific • Calculate the predictive value of a positive test for detecting colon CA

  16. Improved version of hemmocult testing is 50% sensitive and 90% specific • Calculate the predictive value of a positive test for detecting colon cancer

  17. Risk • Relative Risk = The risk of an event after therapy as a percentage of risk without therapy • RR= Exp event rate/control event rate • Relative Risk Reduction=The proportional reduction in rates of bad events between exp and control groups • RRR= 1-RR

  18. Absolute Risk Reduction: The absolute arithmetic difference in rates between the exp and control groups • ARR= Exp event rate – control event rate • Number needed to treat: The # of patients who need to be treated to achieve one favorable outcome • NNN= 1/ARR

  19. Problem #3 • If patients presenting with an evolving CVA are treated with ASA, their one month morbidity rate is 22% whereas the morbidity rate in ASA + plavix is 7%. Calculate: • RR • RRR • ARR • NNT

More Related