1 / 10

FY 2009 COST SAVING MEASURES

FY 2009 COST SAVING MEASURES. Gov. Body Meeting Oct. 14, 2008. General Fund Financial Picture. City has historically provided for additional services to keep pace with growth. Need has not diminished with decline in AV

guinevere-james
Télécharger la présentation

FY 2009 COST SAVING MEASURES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. FY 2009 COST SAVING MEASURES Gov. Body Meeting Oct. 14, 2008

  2. General Fund Financial Picture • City has historically provided for additional services to keep pace with growth. • Need has not diminished with decline in AV • Significant revenue shortfalls in Fiscal Years 2007, 2008*, and anticipated for FY 2009 • Primarily due to decline in assessed values • Other revenues fall short for various reasons • Limited control • Over the same time frame, expenditures have been held in check by Dept Directors & Management • FY 2006: Under budget $600,000 • FY 2007: Under budget $470,000 • FY 2008*: Under budget $325,000 *FY 2008 numbers are preliminary/unaudited

  3. FY 2009 Budget Actions/Reductions • Necessary for cash flow improvement and pave the way for the FY 2010 budget process. • NO tax rate increase proposed for FY 2009 • Prudent action to begin budget reductions NOW • Increases our flexibility and available options to deal with projected shortfall. • Proposed change in assessment date • Significant budget reductions

  4. Change in Assessment Date • Potential for 20% decline in AVs • market changes of this magnitude within a fiscal year in progress creates significant management challenges • Without a change in the assessment process excessive management actions would be needed to reconcile the cost of city services with revenues expected from the declining tax base • Looking at City only for FY 2009, 2 separate scenarios, assuming the 20% assessment decline becomes reality: 1) IF no actions taken now - $1.1 million shortfall for FY 2009 2) IF assessment date moved to July 1 as discussed, and no budget reductions made: • Defers the $1.1 million shortfall, but • Creates a $2+ million shortfall for FY 2010 (based on FY 09 exp.)

  5. Virginia Cities with July 1 Effective Date for Property Assessments • Under existing state tax law, the City can align the assessment date with budget/fiscal year (i.e., align both to July 1) • Not uncommon (53% of VA cities) • Chesapeake • Hampton • Harrisonburg • Lynchburg • Newport News • Norfolk • Portsmouth • Virginia Beach

  6. Budget Reductions - Process • Dept Directors requested to identify a total of $1.1 million in cost reductions for FY 2009 • Minimal impact to current personnel and services • Expand hiring freeze • Admin. & General Government Departments • $3 million total budget • Initial target of 5% - cuts made range from $3,500 to $62,000 • Police, Fire, DPW, Parks, DSS, IT Departments • $14.5 million total budget • Initial target of 10% - cuts made range from $62,000 to $250,000

  7. Sample of Reductions Identified • 2 vacant police officer positions frozen ($112,000) • Fire accreditation ($11,000) • Various DPW contracts ($40,000) • Mosquito Control • All but mandated take-home vehicles ($15,000) • Funding for special events ($45,000) • Events NOT eliminated if funding support found • Office of Teens Coordinator position frozen ($45,000) • Engineering costs – to be funded from related capital projects ($63,000) • Other positions will be frozen as they become vacant • Critical/necessary positions will be examined on a case-by-case basis • Variety of other reductions • Data processing - Travel & Education - Repairs & Maintenance • Books/subscript. - Dues/memberships - Awards/misc

  8. Current Frozen Positions • Deputy City Manager • Business License Officer • IT Manager • 2 Police Officers • Deputy Director of Social Services • Office of Teens Coordinator Note: Positions not eliminated

  9. Impact of Reductions • While any budget reductions have some effect on efficiency and delivery of services, the reductions proposed by Dept Directors have least impact to short-term operations. • Delaying reductions will likely significantly impact to existing services & personnel for the FY 2010 budget. • Additional actions will be required for the FY 2010 budget regardless of the reductions made now.

  10. Next steps • Recommend aligning effective date for assessments with budget year • Governing Body has taken action to implement • Continue to monitor prevailing market conditions and make routine updated reports on any guidance from the VDT or how other local assessors are adapting to these conditions • Continue looking at FY 2009 for cost reductions • Explore opportunities for cost reductions in FY 2010 and beyond: • Cost sharing with surrounding jurisdictions • Implement new Parks & Recreation Center revenue model • FY 2010 budget process • Continue to inform Citizens

More Related