1 / 25

Rural Electric Cooperatives Procurement/Contracting Guidance

Rural Electric Cooperatives Procurement/Contracting Guidance. Roger Jones Region VIII Disaster Assistance Division. Cost. Work. Facility. Applicant. Public Assistance Grant Eligibility Structure. Office of Inspector General Audits. Federal Grants to RECs from 2000 to 2004: $391 M

guinevere-murphy
Télécharger la présentation

Rural Electric Cooperatives Procurement/Contracting Guidance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rural Electric CooperativesProcurement/Contracting Guidance Roger Jones Region VIII Disaster Assistance Division July 14, 2009

  2. Cost Work Facility Applicant Public Assistance Grant Eligibility Structure July 14, 2009

  3. Office of Inspector General Audits • Federal Grants to RECs from 2000 to 2004: $391 M • 9 Audits conducted between 2002-2006 • $59.2 million claimed • $39.2 million for non-competitive contracts July 14, 2009

  4. Objectives • To ensure Rural Electric Cooperatives are knowledgeable of and follow federal procurement standards • To identify and offer remedies for recurring contracting problems identified by OIG Audits • To ensure REC’s understand documentation requirements July 14, 2009

  5. Federal Contracting • RECs should comply with • Their own procurement procedures • State and local laws and regulations • Applicable Federal laws and standards July 14, 2009

  6. Federal Contracting Process Essential Elements • Competition • Scope of work • Qualified proposers/bidders • Cost analysis/price reasonableness • Contract must comply with all Federal, State and local requirements • Documentation July 14, 2009

  7. Acceptable Contracts • Lump Sum • Unit Price • Cost Plus Fixed Fee • Time and Materials/Equipment in limited situations July 14, 2009

  8. Unacceptable Contracts • Cost Plus Percentage of Cost • Contingency • Single Source • Contracts with Few Terms & Conditions • Single Page/Million Dollar Contracts • Contracts Verbally Authorized July 14, 2009

  9. OIG Audits: Typical Areas of Noncompliance • Full and open competition – 13.36(c)(1) • Maintain sufficient documentation – 13.36(b)(9) • Cost or price analysis requirement – 13.36(f)(1) • Time and materials contract restrictions – 13.36(b)(10) July 14, 2009

  10. OIG Audits: Typical Areas of Noncompliance • Cost plus percentage of cost restrictions – 13.36(f)(4) • Profit negotiated separately - 13.36(f)(2) • Lack of a contract administration system – 13.36(b)(2) July 14, 2009

  11. Full and Open Competition • Intended for all procurements • Avoid restricting competition • Placing unreasonable requirements for firms to qualify • Requiring unnecessary experience • Requiring brand names, but not “or equal” • Making noncompetitive awards • Other arbitrary actions in the procurement process July 14, 2009

  12. Maintain Sufficient Documentation • Facilitates federal grants process • Must detail significant history of a procurement • Rationale for • Method of procurement • Selection of contract type • Contractor for contractor selection or rejection • Basis for contract price July 14, 2009

  13. Cost or Price Analysis Requirement • Cost or price analysis • Is required for every procurement action • Independent estimates must be prepared • Goal: defensible and reasonable cost July 14, 2009

  14. Time and Materials Contract Restrictions • Should be avoided • To be used ONLY • If no other contract type is suitable • If the contract includes a not to exceed ceiling price • Contractor exceeds at his own risk • If used immediately after a disaster to restore power • Careful applicant monitoring and documentation of work and costs • Contact State to ensure proper guidelines are followed July 14, 2009

  15. Cost Plus Percentage of Cost Restrictions • Strict prohibition against • Contractor • Adds overhead/profit percentage to each dollar invoiced • Has no incentive to be efficient or cost effective • Bears virtually no risk July 14, 2009

  16. Profit Negotiated Separately • Required when cost analysis is performed • Fair and reasonable profit considers • Complexity of the work • Amount of contractor risk and investment • Amount of subcontracting • Quality of past performance • Local industry standard rates July 14, 2009

  17. Lack of a Contract Administration System • OIG saw no improvement in REC compliance • Contract Administration System should • Be in place for future disasters • Develop and implement written, compliant procedures • Ensure adequate competition • Structure and award pre-placed contracts • Protect future federal grants July 14, 2009

  18. Suggestions • Contracts can be developed, and formats, solicitation process, etc. can be shared among the REC network • Contracts can be prepared during “normal” non-emergency periods • Competitively obtained, pre-placed, pre-priced contracts could help ensure compliance with federal requirements as well as successful response and recovery July 14, 2009

  19. REC Contracting: Summary • RECs are NOT exempt from Federal contracting requirements • Need effective contract administration and documentation procedures • Mutual aid support and time and materials contract format are for emergency response to restore power July 14, 2009

  20. REC Contracting: Summary • Use acceptable contract types for permanent recovery work • Effective pre-disaster contract planning will help • Failure to follow federal contracting requirements could impact eligibility for federal grants assistance July 14, 2009

  21. Special Considerations Special considerations are issues other than program eligibility that could affect the scope of work and funding of a project. These issues include: • Insurance • Floodplain Management • Hazard Mitigation • Environmental Protection / Historic and Cultural Resources • Codes & Standards July 14, 2009

  22. Other Items: Codes & Standards • Apply to the repair work being performed(the damaged element/sections only) • Be appropriate to the pre-disaster use of the facility • Be reasonable, in writing, formally adopted, and implemented prior to the disaster declaration date or be a legal Federal requirement July 14, 2009

  23. Other Items: Codes & Standards • Apply uniformly to all facilities of the type being repaired within the applicant’s jurisdiction(cannot allow selective application) • Be enforced during the time that it was in effect(may require documentation for prior enforcement) RUS standards are NOT recognized as codes and standards for the purposes of Stafford Act grants July 14, 2009

  24. Other Items: Scope of Work • Variations in large project Scopes of Work must have the prior approval from the Grantee (State) and perhaps FEMA July 14, 2009

  25. www.fema.gov Roger Jones 303-235-4907 roger.jones@dhs.gov Colleen McNeese 303-235-4609 colleen.mcneese@dhs.gov July 14, 2009

More Related