420 likes | 566 Vues
This overview discusses the imperative for libraries to adapt to changing user behaviors and budget constraints. It highlights the shift from user workflows built around library services to libraries needing to tailor their services to user workflows. The document explores the digital landscape, including social networking, collaborative selection, and metadata's role in enhancing the collective collection. It also addresses strategies for maximizing resources, improving user engagement, and providing user-centric services while navigating institutional barriers and pressures.
E N D
Curating the Collective Collection Ricky Erway RLG Programs OCLC Programs and Research Western Digital Forum 9 August 2007
OVERVIEW • The context in which we find ourselves • User perspective – changed information seeking behaviors • Library perspective – increasing demands + decreasing budgets = need to be more efficient in order to remain relevant • Thoughts about effecting change
Information consumer environment • Network-level aggregation of supply and demand • Patterns of learning, research, information production and consumption • Personal collections and data reproduction • Customer relation management
Gather, create and share.... • Personal collections • Photos • Books • Research • Jokes • Opinions • News • Music
Institutional environment – Current impacts • Agile, rich new competitors • Library budget pressure • Service fragmentation • Redundant effort
Institutional environment – Barriers to progress • Process standardization • Resistance to outsourcing • One-dimensional client relations • Resistance toward change
Then: Resources were scarce, attention was abundant Now: Attention is scarce, resources are abundant Then: The user built workflow around the library’s services Now: The library must build its services around user workflow
Something’s gotta give • New initiatives are absorbed into existing budgets • Many duplicative efforts • In selection • In acquisitions • In cataloging • In disclosure and access • In storage • In digital projects • In digital repositories • Expensive legacy systems maintained locally • And our users are often not discovering our information!
Possibilities • Catalog records for commonly held content • Digitized books in a single index • Remote storage • Vocabularies • User contributed content
More possibilities • Social networking • Advanced functionality • Disclosure and exposure • Other behind-the-scenes operational possibilities • Authentication • service registries • metadata maps • identifier services • institutional profiling services • terminology services
If we free up some resources…. • ILS refocused on local operations • Redeploy staff • New opportunities • Offering new user-centric services • Support for education and scholarly communication • The library as place • Information commons • Group and individual study spaces • Classroom support • Computer lab with media production support • Writing lab • Project space • Coffee shop
What will it mean to curate the collective collection? • Shared print storage • Effective lending practices • Coordinated digitization • Collaborative selection • Making our data work harder
Focus on special collections • Material that • is unique or rare • is in a variety of formats • will only be acquired once • need only be cataloged once • supports our local users • we are best suited to maintain • will be accessed by remote users • requires preservation • Basis for assessment • Scale up digitization to avoid marginalization
The role of metadata in the collective collection • Blaming the victim • Improved systems that: • Make use of existing metadata, without unnecessary modifications • Have improved handling of vocabularies • Encourage shortcuts • Take advantage of Web 2.0 possibilities • Increase our reach
The great thing about Standards is…. …that there are so many to choose from
But it’s not even that simple… Various interfaces
Contact • Ricky Erway • (650) 691-2228 • erwayr@oclc.org