1 / 5

CII Annual Conference 2005: Research Presentation

CII Annual Conference 2005: Research Presentation. Commodity vs Value-Added Services: Lost in Translation. presented by. Commodity vs Value-Added Contractor Services Research Team. Commodity vs Value-Added Contractor Services Research Team (RT 205). Jose A. Buitrago CSA Group

gus
Télécharger la présentation

CII Annual Conference 2005: Research Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CII Annual Conference 2005: Research Presentation Commodity vs Value-Added Services:Lost in Translation presented by Commodity vs Value-Added Contractor Services Research Team

  2. Commodity vs Value-Added Contractor Services Research Team (RT 205) Jose A. Buitrago CSA Group Jim Early BE&K, Co-Chair Tom Garrett Honeywell International Barry Hall Lockwood Greene Jim Hershauer Arizona State University Mark Loper AZCO Dan Martin WorleyParsons Group Robert McManus Southern Company Robert Nartonis M.A. Mortensen Kevin O’Leary HATCH Stan Schaffer Anheuser-Busch, Co-Chair Don Sutphin Baker Concrete Graeme Telford GlaxoSmithKline Travis Twardowski Rohm and Haas Jack Wacker Arizona State University Robert Wasmund DuPont Ken Walsh San Diego State University

  3. Research Team Project Objectives • Develop precise definitions of terms. • Develop understanding of owner and contractor marketing and procurement strategies in capital project delivery process. • Develop and test conceptual models for use by owners and contractors. • Develop implementation materials to support deployment of the models.

  4. Findings • Common definitions are critical in order to overcome communications barriers. • Owners looking for net value-added services. • More investment in front-end loading increases net value-added to owners. • Perceptions drive responses and net value-added.

  5. Recommendations • Owners and Contractors • Ensure you understand each other (definitions). • Owners • Use bid selection tool understood by both parties. • Identify commodity vs netvalue-added services. • Contractors • Provide net value-added proposals. • Understand when providing commodity vs net value-add. • Use available tools to differentiate services.

More Related