1 / 8

Who are We ?

Who are We ?. We are: Jefferson County, Alabama, Drug Court Beacon Addiction Treatment Center Both affiliated with: Treatment Alternatives for Safer Communities (TASC) University of Alabama at Birmingham Target: Drug Court clients referred to Beacon Addiction Treatment Center.

gus
Télécharger la présentation

Who are We ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Who are We? • We are: • Jefferson County, Alabama, Drug Court • Beacon Addiction Treatment Center • Both affiliated with: • Treatment Alternatives for Safer Communities (TASC) • University of Alabama at Birmingham • Target: Drug Court clients referred to Beacon Addiction Treatment Center

  2. Change #1 (PLAN) To decrease wait time between Orientation for treatment and Intake/Assessment

  3. CHANGE #1 (DO) We changed the process of scheduling admission appointments - • Prior to change: Counselors made appointments at their discretion • Change: “Open clinic” schedule was developed where clients are given an appointment day and time and are assigned a counselor upon arrival

  4. RESULTS (STUDY) • Baseline: Average number of days between orientation and admission = 12.4 • Post Change: Average number of days between orientation and admission = 2.0 84% decrease in time

  5. NEXT STEP (ACT) In addition to favorable results directly related to the change, we had an unintended positive side effect: • Increased client return rate by nine percentage points (from 76% to 85%), saving counselor time and increasing billing • We adopted the change.

  6. IMPACT • By decreasing time between orientation and assessment, we benefit more than $17,000 per year ($11,225 + $6,009) • As a result we have implemented the NIATx method of Plan, Do, Study, and Act in other areas.

  7. Other NIATx Change Studies NIATx Change #2 Telephone Drug Court clients day before Orientation to remind them of appointment in order to increase attendance • Increased “Show Up” rate by 23% (from 59% to 82%)

  8. NIATx Change #3 Add PAMI (Promoting Awareness of Motivational Incentives) to improve IOP treatment attendance • Increased attendance in treatment group by 4%

More Related