1 / 14

Technical Review Process and Guidelines

Technical Review Process and Guidelines. Dr. Pushpa Raj Sharma Professor in Child Health Institute of Medicine. Questions that is answered by thesis:. What was the problem? What was the relevance of the problem? What information was already available?

gzifa
Télécharger la présentation

Technical Review Process and Guidelines

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Technical Review Process and Guidelines Dr. Pushpa Raj Sharma Professor in Child Health Institute of Medicine

  2. Questions that is answered by thesis: • What was the problem? • What was the relevance of the problem? • What information was already available? • What was hoped to be achieved by the study? • What additional data were needed to meet the objectives? • How these data were collected? • Was it ethical to conduct the study in the way it was done? • How data were collected and was analyzed? • What was the outcome and how much it was useful? • Is it a good evidence?

  3. Declaration Thesis page Abstract Acknowledgement Table of contents Introduction Literature review Hypothesis/objective Materials and methods Results and discussions Conclusion and suggestions for further work References Appendices Some Important Headings

  4. Abstract • The abstract should contain the essence of the whole paper and should stand alone. • It should consist of four basic parts: • Why the study was done? • What was done? • What was found? • What was concluded? • Maximum of 300 words for a structured abstract. • Clear and concise and without unnecessary detail.

  5. Literature review • Where did the problem came from? • What is already known about this problem? What other methods have been tried to solve it? • How many papers? Is it supported by good evidences?

  6. Hypothesis / Objectives • Covers the different aspects of the problem and its contributing factors in a coherent way and in a logical sequence. • Clearly phrases in operational terms, specifying exactly what student is going to do, where and for what purpose. • Uses action verbs that are specific enough to be evaluated.

  7. Materials and Methods • How the study was designed? • Is the description brief? • Does it says how randomization was done?. • Does it use names to identify parts of a study sequence?

  8. How the study was carried out? • Describes how subjects were recruited and chosen. • Gives reasons for excluding subjects. • Considers mentioning ethical features. • Gives accurate details of materials used. • Gives exact drug dosage. • Gives the exact form of treatment and accessible details of unusual apparatus.

  9. How the data were analyzed? • Uses p value to disprove the null hypothesis. • Gives an estimate of the power of the study ( the likelihood of a false negative error) • Gives the exact tests used for statistical analysis

  10. Results and discussion • Use a mixture of text, tables and figures. • Give the actual numbers of the results that are plotted. • Establish how comparable your groups are. • Describe the unexpected results also. • Do not give results to a greater degree of accuracy than that of the measurement. • Avoid using percentage unless the groups have more than 100 subjects.

  11. When considering results does it gives the number of subjects, the range of results, the central tendency (mean± SD), and the spread (confidence interval for the mean)? • If an analysis of variance done does it gives the estimates with their degrees of freedom. Do not forget to see the p value. • Tables and illustrations should have an appropriate legend and stand alone. • Don't give carried away with the computer graphics if they do not add anything.

  12. Conclusions and suggestions for further work • conclusions should include abstract in very brief form, some material and methods and results. • suggest any interesting further avenues? Are there ways in which this work could be improved by future workers? • What are the practical implications of this work? • This chapter should usually be reasonably short - a few pages perhaps.

  13. References • For an article: • Pandey MR; Sharma PR; Gubhaju BB et al. Impact of a pilot acute respiratory infection (ARI) control programme in a rural community of the hill region of Nepal. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics, 1989: 9: 212-220 • For a book: • Behrman RE, Kliegmann RM; Arvin AM (Eds). Nelsons Textbook of Pediatrics. 15th Ed. W.B. Saunders Co. 1996; 378. • For a chapter in a book: • Shapiro LJ. Inheritence Patterns. In: Behrman RE; Kliegmann RM; Arvin AM (Eds). Nelson's Textbook of Pediatrics. 15th Ed. W.B. Saunders Co. 1996; 308-312

  14. Thank you • Visti the website:

More Related