1 / 18

IQER

IQER. Developmental Engagement Recommendations Not published Summative Review Assessed, confidence, limited confidence, no confidence Published. IQER. Original Dates Notified in June of the dates SE – 8 th August 2008 DE – 24 th October 2008 SR – Spring 2010. IQER. Revised dates:

hagop
Télécharger la présentation

IQER

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IQER • Developmental Engagement • Recommendations • Not published Summative Review • Assessed, confidence, limited confidence, no confidence • Published

  2. IQER • Original Dates • Notified in June of the dates • SE – 8th August 2008 • DE – 24th October 2008 • SR – Spring 2010

  3. IQER • Revised dates: • SE – September 8th 2008 • Student submission October 2008 • DE – 1st and 2nd December 2008 • SR – Spring 2010

  4. IQER • Responsibilities • Line of enquiry 1 – Reg Davies • Line of enquiry 2 – Julie Bellfield • Line of enquiry 3 – Val Keeling • Curriculum areas: • Reg Davies – Science and Theatre Studies • Julie Bellfield – Life-long learning Education & Early Years • Val Keeling – Engineering • Nigel Hall – Business and Management, Accounting, Sport

  5. IQER • Agenda • Initial meeting – July • Lines of enquiry agreed • Draft SE sent to Co-ordinator and Universities • SE posted on ARCS – 8th September 2008 • Notification from QAA that DE could proceed – 17th September 2008 • Written review of the SE sent to Nigel – 25th September 2008

  6. The Journey • Agenda (contd) • Summary of the SE report posted on ARCS, with requirements for additional information and further evidence needed at the DE. • Preparatory meeting – 30th September

  7. The Journey • In the beginning…. • 4 day training to be reviewers • Writing the 3 lines of enquiry • Writing the SE • Writing the HE Strategy - Rewriting of the college policies to include higher education • Student submission

  8. The Journey • Writing of the SE • All programme leaders involved in forming the lines of enquiry • Distributed to HEIs before final submission for comments

  9. The Journey • Meetings with staff/students • To formulate the lines of enquiry • Presentations given to College Directors. SMT, programme leaders. • ‘Frequently Asked Question’ sheet circulated to all HE staff. • Student submission • Presentation by Co-ordinator to staff and student reps.

  10. The Journey • Communication • Monthly HE meetings for staff to disseminate good practice and to support staff on new programmes. • Use of Moodle for students and staff (HE common room, HE staff room} • COORDINATOR CONSTANTLY IN TOUCH

  11. The Journey Student submission Submitted by mid October • Circulated question sheet regarding assessment to all students • 2/3 student reps wrote the submission from these comments.

  12. The Journey The Event • Reviewers: Val Keeling – college nominee/facilitator Julie Bellfield – College Nominee Nigel Hall – Co-ordinator Reg Davies – External Reviewer

  13. The Journey • Organisation of the 3 meetings • Staff meeting • Student meeting • HEIs quality unit/link tutors/programme leaders/marketing/resources/MIS

  14. The Journey • The Event • Getting the base room ready • Acting as Reviewers • Writing the report • Writing the action plan

  15. The Journey Meetings: • First morning –staff 2. Afternoon – Students 3. 2nd morning – universities, programme leaders, employers

  16. The Journey • What they liked – why was it a success? • Self Evaluation report • HE Strategy • Team work – Staff/students/HEIs • VLE • HE Academic Board and the HE SAR • ORGANISATION

  17. Happy Ever After? Results • 10 areas of recommendation • No essential recommendations • 1 advisable • 3 desirable

  18. And next………

More Related