Download
1 / 5
50 likes | 209 Vues
This document outlines the essential criteria that review committees consider when evaluating appointments and promotions within the Department of Medicine. Key focus areas include scholarly achievements such as writing and peer review, teaching and mentoring activities including courses and awards, and evidence of professional reputation at local, regional, national, and international levels. The importance of strong letters of recommendation, particularly from impartial sources, is also emphasized to ensure a fair assessment of candidates’ qualifications.
E N D
Appointments and Promotions What review committees look for Department of Medicine FDDC October 20, 2009
Criteria Considered by Committee • Scholarly Achievements • Area you develop which is your own • Writing • Evidence of peer review
Criteria Considered by Committee • Teaching/ Mentoring activities • Courses • Curriculum • Precepting • Teaching awards • Mentoring – names and role • Thesis committees
Criteria Considered by Committee • Evidence of reputation local/regional/national/international • Presentations • Citations of your work • Use of your work in other settings
Criteria Considered by Committee • Letters of recommendation • “arm’s length”, especially at associate/ full • Knows your discipline • Does not need to know you • Not close friend/ close collaborator
