1 / 10

Understanding HAsim

Understanding HAsim. Michael Adler. Asim vs. HAsim. Similarities Configured with AWB Split functional / timing Timing driven Minimum timing state: IP Functional interface methods. Differences Inherently spatial and parallel:

hali
Télécharger la présentation

Understanding HAsim

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Understanding HAsim • Michael Adler

  2. Asim vs. HAsim Similarities • Configured with AWB • Split functional / timing • Timing driven • Minimum timing state: IP • Functional interface methods • Differences • Inherently spatial and parallel: • Timing model is modules (state machines) connected by serial channels • Distributed computation of time • Communication is expensive • Can’t pass a big ASIM_INST through all FIFOs • Pass token instead • No smart pointers • More careful management of token lifetimes

  3. Asim vs. HAsim Model Structure Asim • Hierarchical modules • Central scheduler manages • Clock tree • Model parallelism • Named ports manage latency • HAsim • Flat module space • Distributed control • Time tracked locally (A-Port protocol) • Inherently parallel • Multiplexing controlled locally • Named ports manage latency and time

  4. HAsim Dataflow: Latency Insensitive (LI) Channels • Each module is an independent state machine • All arrows are LI channels: • Functional channels are simple LI channels (FIFOs) • Timing channels are A-Ports (FIFO with latency and model time) Fetch Decode Execute Functional Fetch Functional Decode Functional Execute

  5. Latency-Insensitive (LI) Channels • Lowest level LEAP channel • Named channel: • Endpoints are declared and LEAP makes the connection • Endpoints need not be on the same FPGA • Simple semantics: • FIFO • Unspecified buffering (at least one slot) • Unspecified latency, though on chip it is typically one cycle • Convenience functions build request/response pairs • Connection_Send#(CONTROL_MODEL_COMMIT_MSG) linkModelCommit<-mkConnection_Send("model_commits");

  6. Timing A-Port • LI channel with timing model semantics • Receiver specifies latency • Internal buffering is at least latency * number of multiplexed instances • Model cycle is defined to be the number of messages passed through an A-Port • All readers/writers of A-Ports must honor this requirement • A-Port type is typically a Maybe#(<real type>) • tagged Invalid means no message but cycle advances • tagged Valid <data> is activity and cycle advances • PORT_RECV_MULTIPLEXED#(MAX_NUM_CPUS,DCACHE_LOAD_OUTPUT_DELAYED) rspFromDCacheDelayed<-mkPortRecv_Multiplexed("DCache_to_CPU_load_delayed", 1); rule stagex;let m_complete <- rspFromDCacheDelayed.receive(cpu_iid); if (m_complete matches tagged Valid .rsp) begin … endend

  7. HAsim’s A-Port Library • Convenience wrappers for common idioms • Compositions of simple A-Ports A-Port Stage A Stage B Credit Stall Port • We will see another standard composition, permutation ports, later in on-chip networks

  8. Distributed Control • Each module allocates a local controller • Takes start/stop/pause commands from software global controller • Determines which CPU instance is running in multiplexed modules • Arguments to mkLocalController are vectors of managed A-Ports • startModelCycle may fire when all inports have a message and all outports have space • module IFETCH; LOCAL_CONTROLLER#(MAX_NUM_CPUS) localCtrl <- mkLocalController(inports,outports); • rule stage0; • let cpu_iid <- localCtrl.startModelCycle(); …endrule • rule stageN;localCtrl.endModelCycle(cpu_iid, 1); …endruleendmodule

  9. Multiplexed Models • Each HAsim pipeline may model many multiplexed instances • Implementation is similar to SMT: • Single instance of pipeline logic • Replicated state • Local controller returns the active instance IDlet cpu_iid <- localCtrl.startModelCycle(); …localCtrl.endModelCycle(cpu_iid, 1); • Multiplexing is currently round-robin • FIFOs are very efficient on FPGAs • Random access requires addressable storage – big area penalty

  10. HAsim Packages • Standard Asim: AWB and simcore • LEAP: • Required: leap, leap-platforms • Optional: leap-debug, leap-examples • HAsim: • Required: hasim, hasim-models • Optional: hasim-alpha, m5, hasim-mips

More Related