1 / 50

Anxiety and Pain Control 2007

Anxiety and Pain Control 2007. John A. Yagiela, DDS, PhD Utah Dental Association Salt Lake City February 9, 2007. Local Anesthesia Topics. Articaine: efficacy versus neurotoxicity Advances in local anesthetic metabolism Ropivacaine as a dental anesthetic

halima
Télécharger la présentation

Anxiety and Pain Control 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Anxiety and Pain Control 2007 John A. Yagiela, DDS, PhD Utah Dental Association Salt Lake City February 9, 2007

  2. Local Anesthesia Topics • Articaine: efficacy versus neurotoxicity • Advances in local anesthetic metabolism • Ropivacaine as a dental anesthetic • Oraqix, the topical anesthetic for periodontics • NV-101 (phentolamine mesylate), a new reversal agent for local anesthesia

  3. Articaine Hydrochloride (Septocaine) • Old new drug • Thiophene-based amide • Metabolized by plasma carboxyesterase • Low maximum dosage; low accumulation with repeated dosing • 4% solution more effective than 2% lidocaine, both with epinephrine? • Increased incidence of nerve damage

  4. CH CH 3 3 H H 3 3 Articaine (Septocaine, Zorcaine): a thiophene derivative O O H H NHC CH N NHC CH N S C H C H 3 7 3 7 C C COOCH 3 Articaine Prilocaine

  5. Mean Sensory Voltage: First Premolar 300 F B F B F 250 F B F F B B A B B A J A F F J F A J F J F E J E A B E F J J B E J A A A J A F E 200 E J B J F J F J E E J J J A B B B J J E B F E A E A B B B A ∆ Voltage (V) F A A A E E 150 A E Lid-2%-H E A E F E B B E Ult-2%-L E 100 Ult-2%-H J Ult-4%-L A 50 Ult-4%-H F 0 E A F B J 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Time (min)

  6. VAS pain scores 4% A + Epi 2% L + Epi Malamed SF, et al. J Am Dent Assoc 131:635-42, 2000

  7. Studies showing increased efficacy of articaine • Potocnik et al. J Dent Res 2006;85:162-6. • Rat sural nerve study • 2% and 4% articaine better than 2% and 4% lidocaine and 3% mepivacaine at blocking A fibers (but not C fibers) • Kanaa et al. J Endod 2006;32:296-8. • Randomized double-blind cross-over study using electronic pulp tester • Articaine more effective than lidocaine after mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia (65% vs. 39%)

  8. The efficacy question • No proof of increased effectiveness in double-blind clinical trials using standard injections • No clinical trial with sufficient power to distinguish small differences • If 97.5% versus 95% efficacy and 40 patients per week, • one less failure per week

  9. Local anesthesia use in Germany (1996) 2% 3% Articaine 4% 91% Lidocaine Mepivacaine Others

  10. Local anesthesia use in Canada (1999) Articaine 12% Prilocaine 46% 32% Lidocaine Mepivacaine 6% 4% Bupivacaine

  11. Haas, DA, Lennon D: A 21 year retrospective study of reports of paresthesia following local anesthetic administration. J Can Dent Assoc 61:319-30, 1995. • Study of reports to the Professional Liability Program of Ontario, Canada (1973-1993) • Surgery cases excluded • 143 reports (lip, 42; tongue, 92; both, 9) • No significant effect of age, gender, or needle gauge

  12. Reported cases of paresthesiaby year Articaine marketed Haas DA, Lennon D: J Can Dent Assoc 61:297-304, 1995

  13. Incidence data • Articaine and prilocaine: 91% of cases • 1993 incidence by agent • Articaine: 1/440,000 • Prilocaine: 1/588,000 • Lidocaine: none • Mepivacaine: none Haas DA, Lennon D: J Can Dent Assoc 61:297-304, 1995

  14. Hillerup S, Jensen R: Nerve injury caused by mandibular block analgesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:437-43, 2006. • Consecutive patients with injection injury to oral branches of trigeminal nerve 1997-2004 • Referrals from colleagues and Danish Dental Association’s Patient Insurance Scheme (covering all dentists) • patients with unilateral injection injury: 40 lingual nerve; 10 inferior alveolar; 2 both

  15. Cases of nerve injury by year Articaine marketed Hillerup S, Jensen R: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:437-43, 2006

  16. Incidence data • Articaine : 55% of cases • 2001-2002 incidence data • Articaine: 20 times higher incidence than other local anesthetics combined Hillerup S, Jensen R: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 35:437-43, 2006

  17. Johnson ME, Saenz JA, DaSilva AD, et al: Effect of local anesthetic on neuronal cytoplasmic calcium and plasma membrane lysis (necrosis) in a cell culture model. Anesthesiology 97:1466-76, 2002 • NDE7 neurons derived from dorsal root ganglion loaded with fura-2 • Cells exposed to lidocaine 0.1%-5% for 60 min • Fluorescence microscopy for Ca2+ and cell death during exposure period

  18. Effect of lidocaine on intracellular Ca2+ Johnson: Anesthesiology 97:1466-76, 2002

  19. Effect of lidocaine on neuronal survival Johnson: Anesthesiology 97:1466-76, 2002

  20. Kishimoto T, Bollen AW, Drasner K: Comparative spinal neurotoxicity of prilocaine and lidocaine. Anesthesiology 97:1250-3, 2002. • Rats received intrathecal infusions of 2.5% prilocaine, 2.5% lidocaine, or normal saline (n=30/group) • Tail-flick test day 4 • Histopathologic examination day 7

  21. Comparative spinal neurotoxicity of prilocaine and lidocaine Kishimoto et al: Anesthesiology 97:1250-3, 2002

  22. Postulated mechanism for nerve injury

  23. Deficits related to anesthetic and vasoconstrictor concentrations • Selander et al. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1979;23:127-36. • Differing concentrations of bupivacaine with and without epinephrine injected into and around sciatic nerve fascicles in rabbits • Injection beneath epineurium resulted no injury except with excessive bupivacaine concentrations • Injection beneath perineurium resulted in concentration- and vasoconstrictor-dependent axonal degeneration

  24. Intrafascicular injection causes neurologic deficits • Hadzic et al. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2004;29:417-23. • 4 mL 2% lidocaine with 1:25,000 epinephrine injected into and around sciatic nerve fascicles in dogs in 1 min • Injection beneath epineurium resulted in little injection pressure and no injury • Injection beneath perineurium resulted in high injection pressure and axonal degeneration

  25. Summary of findings • Statistical association of 4% local anesthetic solutions with higher incidence of damage • Local anesthetics are neurotoxic in clinical concentrations • Neurotoxicity is concentration dependent • Clinically used local anesthetics show similar inherent neurotoxicity • The perineurium serves as a barrier to local anesthetic distribution • Intrafascicular injection appears to be required for damage • The lingual nerve has as few as 1 fascicle

  26. Local Anesthetic Metabolism Role of cytochrome P450 enzymes

  27. Principal drug metabolizing enzymes

  28. Lidocaine metabolism

  29. Lidocaine pharmacokinetics • CYP1A2 is the major determinant of lidocaine metabolism in patients with normal liver function • Liver disease reduces CYP1A2 activity • Fluvoxamine (Luvox) inhibits oxidative metabolism of lidocaine, MEGX, and GX by 60% Orlando et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004;75:80-8.

  30. Lidocaine pharmacokinetics (2) • CYP3A4 is normally a minor determinant of lidocaine metabolism in patients with normal liver function • Liver disease may not significantly reduce CYP3A4 activity • Erythromycin inhibits lidocaine metabolism by 15%-20% Orlando et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;55:86-93.

  31. Effect of fluvoxamine on lidocaine pharmacokinetics Healthy subjects Cirrhotic patients Orlando et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2004;75:80-8.

  32. Effect of erythromycin on lidocaine pharmacokinetics Healthy subjects Cirrhotic patients Orlando et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;55:86-93.

  33. Lidocaine pharmacokinetics influenced by stress • Rats without stress compared to rats experiencing mandibular osteotomy, cold swimming stress, experimental arthritis • Lidocaine (3 mg/kg) administered every 2 hr for 5 doses. • Serum lidocaine measured 2 hr after last dose Saranteas et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:858-62.

  34. Lidocaine pharmacokinetics influenced by stress Saranteas et al. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:858-62.

  35. Anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine without vasoconstrictor for inferior alveolar nerve block El-Sharrawy EA, Yagiela JA. Anesth Prog 2006;53:3-7.

  36. Study design • Randomized parallel-group, dose-ranging study of 72 ASA I patients receiving mandibular 3rd molar extraction • One cartridge for inferior alveolar-lingual nerve block and buccal infiltration • Re-injection up to two times if failure of previous injections El-Sharrawy and Yagiela. Anesth Prog 2006;53:3-7.

  37. Onset time (soft-tissue)

  38. Quality of anesthesia

  39. Quality of anesthesia (2)

  40. Duration of anesthesia

  41. Duration of analgesia

  42. Lidocaine and prilocaine periodontal gel (Oraqix)

  43. Disclaimers • Some of the information presented here was developed by Dentsply • I was a single-site principal investigator for one multisite phase 3 trial of Oraqix • Dentsply has provided a gift to UCLA for me to develop a DVD-based local anesthesia learning resource

  44. Lidocaine and prilocaine periodontal gel 2.5%/2.5%(Oraqix) • Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics • Solution at room temperature; gel at body temperature • First topical anesthetic specifically designed for scaling and root planing • FDA approved December 19, 2003 • http://www.oraqix.com

  45. Lidocaine and prilocaine periodontal gel 2.5%/2.5%(Oraqix) • Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics • Solution at room temperature; gel at body temperature • First topical anesthetic specifically designed for scaling and root planing • FDA approved December 19, 2003

  46. Oraqix delivery syringe

  47. Oraqix cartridge contents • Lidocaine/prilocaine 2.5%/2.5% • Poloxamers 188 and 407 • HCl for pH adjustment • Purified water • pH 7.5-8.0

More Related