Investigating Short GRBs: Are They Magnetar Flares from Nearby Galaxies?
120 likes | 243 Vues
This presentation explores the intriguing possibility that some short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) may actually be giant magnetar flares detected from nearby galaxies. Kevin Hurley from UC Berkeley's Space Sciences Laboratory discusses observational data from events like SGR1806-20 and examines statistical analyses that suggest up to 15% of short GRBs could be associated with these flares. Through a robust assessment of energy luminosities and event rates, this research aims to clarify the relationship between short GRBs and giant magnetar flares, encouraging further exploration in the field.
Investigating Short GRBs: Are They Magnetar Flares from Nearby Galaxies?
E N D
Presentation Transcript
THE SGR-SHORT BURST CONNECTION SOFT GAMMA REPEATERS Kevin Hurley UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory Kevin Hurley UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory khurley@ssl.berkeley.edu
ARE SOME SHORT GRBs ACTUALLY MAGNETAR FLARES IN NEARBY GALAXIES? • SGR giant flares begin with a ~0.2 s long, hard spectrum spike • The spike is followed by a pulsating tail, but it only contains ~1/1000th of the energy • Viewed from a large distance, only the initial spike would be visible • It would resemble a short duration, hard spectrum GRB • It could be detected out to ~100 Mpc GIANT FLARE FROM SGR1806-20 RHESSI DATA
Some short GRBs are almost certainly giant magnetar flares, but how many? • The answer depends on giant magnetar flare luminosities and rates (their number-intensity distribution), which are poorly known • Two approaches: statistical, and burst-by-burst
HOW MANY ARE THERE?(STATISTICAL. I) • Lazzati et al. (2005) studied BATSE short bursts with blackbody-like energy spectra • They found only 3 • Their conclusions: • Up to 4% of short bursts could be SGR giant flares (2σ limit), or • We have overestimated the energy of the galactic giant flares, or • We have overestimated the rate of galactic giant flares
HOW MANY ARE THERE?(STATISTICAL. II) • Nakar et al. (2006) searched for nearby galaxies in the error boxes of 6 short duration hard spectrum GRBs • Their conclusions: • <15% of BATSE short/hard GRBs are SGR giant flares, or • SGR giant flares can be much more energetic and more distant, or • SGR giant flares are very rare, possibly once in a magnetar lifetime, or • The distance to SGR1806 is smaller than previously thought
HOW MANY ARE THERE?(STATISTICAL. III) • Popov & Stern (2005) looked for BATSE bursts from four nearby (<3.7 Mpc) galaxies undergoing star formation, and from the Virgo cluster (17 Mpc) • Their conclusions • < a few percent of BATSE bursts are giant flares, and giant flares are very rare (1/1000 years/magnetar), or • Distance to SGR1806-20 has been overestimated
GRB051103 – A POSSIBLE EXTRAGALACTIC GIANT MAGNETAR FLARE FROM M81 (3.6 Mpc) M82 M81 Swift BAT 15-150 keV (Not imaged) IPN Error Ellipse Eγ=7x1046 erg Frederiks et al. 2007
GRB070201 – A POSSIBLE EXTRAGALACTIC MAGNETAR FLARE FROM M31 (780 kpc) Mazets et al. 2008 IPN Error Box M31 LIGO measurements indicate that this could not have been a binary merger in M31 (Abbott et al. 2008) Eγ=1.5x1045 erg
GRB050906 – A POSSIBLE SGR GIANT FLARE FROM IC 328 (130 Mpc) • GRB050906 was a 0.26 s long, very weak (6x10-9 erg cm-2) Swift burst • It had no fading X-ray or optical counterpart • The BAT error circle includes a z=0.43 cluster (130 Mpc), with a starburst galaxy, IC 328 • If this was its origin, Eγ~1.5x1046 erg Levan et al. 2008
NUMBER-INTENSITY RELATION FOR 6 SGR GIANT FLARES* *not to be taken too seriously
CONCLUSIONS • A small percentage of short GRBs are extragalactic giant magnetar flares • Their number is small enough that it does not contradict anything we know about short GRBs • But it is not zero, so it is important to understand them from the SGR point of view • A definitive search through existing data has not been carried out yet