1 / 3

ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT

ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT. RESEARCH PROJECT EVALUATION FORM.

hamilton-whitehead
Télécharger la présentation

ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT RESEARCH PROJECT EVALUATION FORM This questionnaire seeks information about your experience of research project modules in the Environment Department. Please give considered responses as your responses will contribute to future module reviews. Thank you for your assistance with this evaluation. DEGREE COURSE: ………………………………………………... MODULE TITLE: ………………………………………………... PROJECT SUPERVISOR(S): ………………………………………………... PROJECT TITLE (optional): ………...……………………………………… PART A: MODULE Reasons for ratings given very poor very good A1. Overall opinion of the project as a module A2. Overall organisation of the module A3. Academic challenge of your particular project A4. Integration with other modules A5. Adequacy of lab facilities A6. Adequacy of computing facilities A7. Adequacy of financial support 1 2 3 4 5N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A -1-

  2. PART B: SUPERVISION very poor very good Reasons for ratings given B1. Overall opinion of supervision B2. Help andguidance provided B3. Usefulness of comments on work B4. Ability to stimulate interest in topic B5. Knowledge of supervisor(s) B6. Willingness to discuss problems B7. Guidance with maths/stats/modelling B8. Guidance with finding literature B9. Accessibility for discussion B10. Speed of feedback 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A 1 2 3 4 5 N/A -2-

  3. PART C: SPECIFIC QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR PROJECT C1. When did you start work on your project? Earlier than summer vacation Summer vacation Start of autumn term Middle of autumn term End of autumn term Start of spring term C2. Did your project involve any primary data collection? Yes No C3. How often did you see your supervisor(s) on average during your project? Once a week Once a fortnight Once a month Once every 2 months Once a term < Once a term C4. If you requested a meeting with your supervisor(s), how long on average did you have to wait before you could meet? 1 day 2-3 days 3-4 days 1 week 2 weeks > 2 weeks C5. Please provide comments on how supervision or supervisory practice could be improved C6. Please add any other comments on how you think the overall module or the educational value of the project could be improved -3-

More Related