1 / 26

Volatile FP release from VERCORS tests

Volatile FP release from VERCORS tests. Preamble : What have we learnt from VERCORS tests ? Volatile FP behaviour. Parameters affecting their release. VERCORS HT Loop. What have we learnt ?. VERCORS program. VERCORS- 6 tests (from 1989 and 1994). VERCORS HT/RT-11 tests

hamish-walls
Télécharger la présentation

Volatile FP release from VERCORS tests

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Volatile FP release from VERCORS tests • Preamble : • What have we learnt from VERCORS tests ? • Volatile FP behaviour Parameters affecting their release VERCORS HT Loop International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  2. What have we learnt ? VERCORS program VERCORS- 6 tests (from 1989 and 1994) VERCORS HT/RT-11 tests (from 1996 to 2002) FP classification by volatility degree Fuel collapse temperature International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  3. What have we learnt : Fuel collapse temperature Since the beginning of the RT/HT grid : Systematic fuel collapse for T between 2400/2600 K without significant difference for high burn up fuel in the range of 45-70 GWd/t: Relocation at T < UO2melting point International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  4. What have we learnt : Fuel collapse temperature Same fuel rod Similar temperature evolution histories Beginning of fuel collapse Beginning of fuel collapse Atmosphere effect International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  5. What have we learnt : FP classification From VERCORS program Volatile : gases, I, Cs, Te, Sb, Ag, Rb, Cd Semi-Volatile : Mo, Ba, Rh, Pd, Tc Low-Volatile: Ru, Nb, Sr, Y, La, Ce, Eu Non-Volatile: Zr, Nd, Pr + actinides : U, Np, Pu, Am, Cm International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  6. What have we learnt : FP classification • FPs Volatility for irradiated nuclear fuel • Volatile FP : • Present lecture • Semi-volatile FP : • Release can be as high as for volatile FP, but : • High sensitivity to oxidizing/reducing conditions • Mo very volatile in oxidizing conditions (MoO3) • Ba more volatile in reducing than in oxidizing conditions • Significant retention close to the fuel • Low volatile FP: • Release from few % to 10% BUT potentially higher release (~30-40%) at high burn-up and/or very oxidizing conditions • Deposit very close to the fuel • Non volatile FP: • No significant release (<1%) International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  7. What have we learnt : FP classification International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  8. Volatile FP Behaviour International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  9. Volatile FP behaviour • For each case : • Kinetics (release from the fuel) • Global release • (Transport : G. Ducros, Tuesday, 16) 1 2 3 {gases} {Cs and I} {Te, Sb and Ag} International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  10. Fission gas release: Generalities • Fission gases (Kr and Xe) are composed of isotopes whose half-lives have a very different radiological impact over time under severe PWR accident conditions: • Long half-life for krypton (10.71 years for 85Kr); active over the mid and long term. The other tracer isotopes of the element have sufficiently short half-lives for having no significant impact in the hours following reactor shutdown, with the exception of 85mKr (half-life of 4.48h) whose effects are felt for a little longer. • Short half-lives for the main isotopes of xenon (2.19 days, 5.24 days and 9 h respectively for 133mXe, 133Xe and 135Xe); active in the short term. International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  11. Fission gas release: Kinetics T >> 1200°C 1000°C < T <1200°C Fuel relocation Below 1000°C RT6, UO2, ~70GWd/t International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  12. Fission gas release: Kinetics Consistent with previously reported results (T<1200°C) : 85Kr release METEOR UO2, ~70 GWd/t • MAIN PEAK (T > 1000°C) • Bubbles interconnection and release • Diffusion of intra-granular gas atoms < 2% FIRST PEAK (600-800°C) Grain boundary cracking Y. Pontillon et al., Proceedings of the 2004 International Meeting on LWR Fuel Performance, Orlando, USA, September 2004 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  13. Fission gas release: Global release • Since VERCORS 6: • Total release (100% of the initial inventory) • From VERCORS 1 to 5: • Released fraction is a function of : Final temperature Duration of high T° plateau International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  14. Cs and I release: Generalities • FP of great importance with regard to the radiological consequences following a severe accident in a PWR core. They are composed of isotopes with very different half-lives: • Short half-life for iodine (from 1 hour for 134I to 8 days for 131I); the short-term radiological effects are very high in the first few days following an accident, but are negligible after 1 month. Iodine carries 15% of the core's decay heat 1 day after the emergency shutdown; • Long half-life for caesium (30 years for 137Cs); the radiological effects, which are more or less negligible in the short term (there are nevertheless 138Cs and 136Cs with respective half-lives of 30 min and 13 days) stretch into long term over several decades. International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  15. Cs and I release: Kinetics • Parameters affecting their release rate: • Burn-up, • Oxidizing or reducing conditions, • Fuel nature: • MOX versus UO2 • Initial morphology From VERCORS program International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  16. Cs and I release: Kinetics - BU effect Comparison between RT1 (reference test) and RT6 (High BU test): VERCORS RT6: UO2, 70 GWd/T Mixed H20/H2 VERCORS RT1: UO2, 47 GWd/T Mixed H20/H2 Significant increase in release rates for RT6 compared to RT1 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  17. Cs and I release: Kinetics - Atm effect Comparison between HT2 and HT3 (same fuel used): VERCORS HT2: UO2, 50 GWd/T steam VERCORS HT3: UO2, 50 GWd/T hydrogen Significant increase in release rates for HT2 compared to HT3 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  18. Cs and I release: Kinetics – Fuel nature (MOX versus UO2) Comparison between RT1 (reference test) and RT2 (MOX test): VERCORS RT1: UO2, 47 GWd/T Mixed H20/H2 VERCORS RT2: MOX, 46 GWd/T Mixed H20/H2 Significant increase in release rates for RT2 compared to RT1 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  19. Cs and I release: Kinetics – Fuel nature (Initial morphology) Comparison between RT1 (reference test), RT3 and RT4 : VERCORS RT1: UO2, 47 GWd/T Mixed H20/H2 Release rate RT4 RT4 RT3 RT3 RT1 RT1 VERCORS RT3: UO2, debris bed reducing VERCORS RT4: UO2, debris bed oxidising International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  20. Cs and I release: Global release • Since VERCORS 6: • release almost complete whatever the nature of the test • From VERCORS 1 to 5: • Released fraction is a function of : Final temperature Duration of high T° plateau International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  21. Te, Sb and Ag release: Generalities • Te: • Main isotopes 132Te (3.26 d) and 131mTe (1.25 d).The short-term radiological effects are very high in the first few days following an accident. Parent of the corresponding Iodine. • Sb, main isotopes composed of isotope with very different half-lives : • 125Sb (2.76 y), acting in the long term • 127Sb (3.85 d), acting in the short term • Ag: • Main isotope 110mAg (250 d), acting in the middle/long term International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  22. Te, Sb and Ag release: Kinetics • Results obtained are relatively restricted because of: • Problems with detecting antimony and silver in all the VERCORS tests This made it impossible to monitor their release from the fuel over time • The loss of detectability of 132Te (best tracer isotope for Te) with the use of thoria in the furnace component after VERCORS 6 Data available up to VERCORS 5 International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  23. Te, Sb and Ag release: Kinetics VERCORS 4: UO2, 38 GWd/T hydrogen Tellurium retention in the cladding until the latter was completely oxidised International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  24. Te, Sb and Ag release: Global release • For tellurium and silver : • Global release was comparable and almost total for all of the most severe VERCORS tests, i.e. from VERCORS 6 onwards • The main difference between these two FP was in terms of the quantities deposited in the hot zones of the experimental loop (transport effect) • For antimony: • Release delay by trapping into the clad • For the entire RT grid, the release rates were generally lower than those obtained for VERCORS 4, 5 and 6 (typically around 80-95% and 97-100% respectively for the RT grid and VERCORS 4 to 6) Partial retention in the solidified corium International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  25. Sb release: Global release This retention sometimes (tests VERCORS RT1, RT2 and RT7) involved the dissociation of this element from the solidified corium: Zr after the test = corium position Sb before the test Sb after the test International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

  26. Conclusion • Volatile FP: • Nearly complete release since VERCORS 6, whatever the nature of the test • Up to VERCORS 5: the release is a function of the final Temperature and duration at high temperature plateau • Sensitive to : • Burn up • Atmosphere of the test • Fuel nature Global release Kinetics International VERCORS Seminar, October 15-16th, 2007 – Gréoux les Bains, France

More Related