1 / 39

Non-Photonic Electron-Hadron Correlations at STAR and PHENIX

Non-Photonic Electron-Hadron Correlations at STAR and PHENIX. Bertrand Biritz University of California, Los Angeles. Outline. Motivation Analysis procedure Near-side contribution in p+p collisions Away-side broadness in A+A collisions Outlook.

hamlin
Télécharger la présentation

Non-Photonic Electron-Hadron Correlations at STAR and PHENIX

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Non-Photonic Electron-Hadron Correlations at STAR and PHENIX Bertrand Biritz University of California, Los Angeles

  2. Outline • Motivation • Analysis procedure • Near-side contribution in p+p collisions • Away-side broadness in A+A collisions • Outlook

  3. Further supported by 3-particle correlations Motivations Conical Pattern in 2-Particle Correlations in Au+Au Collisions pTtrig= 2.5-4.0 GeV/c; pTasso = 1.0-2.5 GeV/c Conical Pattern Mark Horner (for STAR Collaboration): J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34 (2007) S995 See STAR paper on 3-particle correlations at arXiv:0805.0622v2 (accepted by PRL)

  4. Near Side: what’s the contribution of B/D decay to the non-photonic electrons? trigger Motivations Conical Pattern in 2-Particle Correlations in Au+Au Collisions pTtrig= 2.5-4.0 GeV/c; pTasso = 1.0-2.5 GeV/c What if we trigger on non-photonic electrons? Mark Horner (for STAR Collaboration): J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 34 (2007) S995 Away Side in medium: How does B/D lose energy? Via conical emission?

  5. Study of heavy flavor via non-photonic electrons PYTHIA • D mesons have their directions well represented by the daughter electrons, above 1.5 GeV/c. • Electrons from B decays can represent the B meson momentum direction well if pT > 3 GeV/c.

  6. PHENIX central arm coverage: • || < 0.35 •  = 2 x π/2 • p > 0.2 GeV/c • typical vertex selection: |zvtx| < 20 cm • charged particle tracking using Drift Chamber (DC) and Pad Chamber 1 (PC1) • electron identification based on • Ring Imaging Cherenkov detector (RICH) • Electro-Magnetic Calorimeter (EMC) Electron ID with PHENIX Data Sample: At sNN = 200 GeV, p+p collisions in run5/6 (2006), Au+Au collisions in run7 (2007).

  7. Electron ID with STAR • TPC • || < 1.5 •  = 2π • p > 0.1 GeV/c • particle ID • BEMC/BSMD • PbSc • 20 X0 • energy and particle rejection: e and h Data Sample: At sNN = 200 GeV, p+p collisions in run5/6 (2006), d+Au collisions in run8 (2008),Cu+Cu collisions in run5 (2005), Au+Au collisions in run7 (2007). • Time Projection Chamber (TPC) • Barrel Electro-Magnetic Calorimeter (BEMC) • Barrel Shower Maximum Detector (BSMD)

  8. Decay photon conversions p0 → g g, g→ e+ e- in material Main background Dalitz decays p0 → ge+ e- Direct photon conversions Small but could be significant at high pT Heavy flavor electrons D/B → e± + X Weak Kaon decays Ke3: K± → p0e±e < 3% contribution in pT > 1 GeV/c Vector Meson Decays w, , fJ,  → e+e- < 2-3% contribution in all pT Electron signal and background Non-photonic electrons Photonic electrons

  9. PHENIX

  10. e+ (global track) (assigned as primary track) e- e- (primary track) dca  Identifying the Photonic Background • The invariant masses of the OS and SS e-pairs have different distributions. • Reconstructed photonic electrons are the result from subtracting SS from OS. • Photonic electrons are (reconstructed photonic electrons) / ε • ε is the background reconstruction efficiency calculated from simulations.

  11. Procedure to Extract the e-h Correlations All Tracks In case of low purity… Pass electron ID cuts Inclusive electrons Non-photonic electrons Photonic electrons Reco-photonic electrons = OppSign – combinatorics Not reco-photonic electrons = (1/ε-1)*(reco-photonic) – Δφhadron Semi-inclusive electrons Δφnon-pho = Δφsemi-incl + ΔφSameSign – (1/eff -1)*(ΔφOppSign – ΔφSameSign) Each element has its own corresponding Δφ histogram.

  12. Near-Side contribution in p+p

  13. Non-photonic e-h correlations in p+p 200GeV • Clear azim. correlation is observed around near and away side. • Fitting measured dn/dφ distribution from B and D decays, we can estimate B decay contribution to non-photonic electron. B D

  14. B contribution to non-photonic e in p+p 200GeV Almost fifty-fifty B and D contributions to non-photonic e’s at 5.5 < pT < 9 GeV/c and FONLL prediction is consistent with our data within errors.

  15. B contribution to non-photonic e in p+p 200GeV

  16. Large bottom quark energy loss? RAA for non-photonic electrons is consistent with hadron’s. This indicates a large energy loss for not only charm but also bottom quarks. non-γ e hadron With the measurements of r @ pp and RAA, we can derive a relationship between

  17. together with models • Dominant uncertainty is normalization in RAA analysis • ; B meson is also suppressed • prefer Dissociate (II) and • Resonance (III) model (large b energy loss) pT > 5 GeV/c STAR preliminary I: Djordjevic,Gyulassy, Vogt and Wicks,Phys. Lett. B 632 (2006) 81; dNg/dy = 1000 II: Adil and Vitev, Phys. Lett. B 649 (2007) 139 III: Hees, Mannarelli, Greco and Rapp,Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 192301

  18. Non-photonic e-h correlations have been measured in p+p collisions to retrieve B and D contributions to non-photonic electrons up to pT~9 GeV/c. • Comparable B and D contributions for electron pT from 5.5~9 GeV/c. • FONLL prediction and the eB/(eB+eD) results are consistent with each other within errors. • The measured B/D ratio would imply considerable b quark energy loss in medium based on RAA measurement from central Au+Au collisions. One more measurement is needed: or r for A+A. Near-side Summary

  19. Away-side broadness in A+A p+p and d+Au collisions serve as a reference for the cold nuclear matter…

  20. 3 < pTtrig< 6 GeV/c & 0.15 < pTasso< 0.5 GeV/c Non-photonic e-h correlations in d+Au 200 GeV STAR Preliminary Non-photonic e-h azimuthal correlation is measured for π range, and open markers are reflections.The away-side correlation can be well described by PYTHIA calculations for p+p i.e. no medium effectsseen.

  21. about 40% non-flow or fluctuation (Gang Wang, Nucl. Phys. A 774 (2006) 515.) 0 – 20%: 3 < pTtrig< 6 GeV/c & 0.15 < pTasso< 0.5 GeV/c Non-photonic e-h correlations in Cu+Cu 200 GeV Upper limits of v2 used are 60% of hadron v2 values measured with the v2{EP} method (equivalent to v2{2}). On the away side, there’s a broad structure or a possible double-hump feature, even before v2 subtraction. PYTHIA fit has a big χ2.

  22. Possible interpretations The away side in e-h is similar to what has been observed in h-h correlations, and consistent with Mach Cone calculations etc. The charm jet deflection provides an alternative interpretation.

  23. 0 – 20%: 3 < pTtrig< 6 GeV/c & 0.15 < pTasso< 0.5 GeV/c Non-photonic e-h correlations in Au+Au 200 GeV STAR Preliminary Upper limits of v2 used are 80% of hadronv2 values measured with the v2{EP} method. Non-photonic e-h correlation is broadened on the away side. PYTHIA fit has a big χ2.

  24. Using the d+Au collision as a reference, the shape of non-photonic e-h azimuthal correlation function is found to be modified in central Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions due to the presence of the dense medium created in these collisions. • Away-side: Hint of a broad structure, similar shape to that from h-h correlations. • Induced by heavy quark interaction with the dense medium? • Quantitative measure and investigation of the nature of the possible conical emission pattern will require more statistics. DAQ1000 will help us there. Should also try 3-particle correlations. Away-side Summary

  25. Thank you

  26. Back up slides

  27.    HQ Production Mechanism    flavor creation • Due to large mass, HQ productions are considered as point-like pQCD processes • HQ is produced at the initial via leading gluon fusion, and sensitive to the gluon PDF • NLO pQCD diagrams show that Q-Qbar could be not back-to-back in transverse plane • We need to study this smearing effect with models   0 gluon splitting

  28. PYTHIA simulations B Each pt bin is weighted with their relative yields, and then they are summed up. For each pt bin, the non-photonic e-h correlations B_corr and D_corr are combined according to B’s and D’s relative contributions to the non-photonic electrons: (eB*B_corr + eD*D_corr) / (eB+eD) D

  29. PuritydAu, CuCu, AuAu: above 98% for 3 < pT < 6 GeV/cp+p collisions: above 98% for 3 < pT < 6 GeV/c; 80% for 9 GeV/c. Electron ID in STAR calibrated Log(dE/dx) With BEMC and BSMD, the electron peak is enhanced in the energy loss distribution, and we obtain a very pure electron sample.

  30. 3 < pTtrig < 6 GeV/c & 0.15 < pTasso < 0.5 GeV/c PYTHIA simulations weighted with CuCu yields B D Here we assume the B/D contribution in CuCu is similar to that in p+p. Even if they are not similar, we don’t expect the double-hump without a medium.

More Related