1 / 13

We [For]got Him: Narrative forgetting and bin Laden’s death

We [For]got Him: Narrative forgetting and bin Laden’s death. Lee Jarvis (Swansea) and Jack Holland (Surrey). Overview. 3 aspects in the narration of bin Laden’s killing: The operation: success and desirability Bin Laden: the man and his life Consequences of his death 2 observations:

hamlin
Télécharger la présentation

We [For]got Him: Narrative forgetting and bin Laden’s death

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. We [For]got Him:Narrative forgetting and bin Laden’s death Lee Jarvis (Swansea) and Jack Holland (Surrey)

  2. Overview • 3 aspects in the narration of bin Laden’s killing: • The operation: success and desirability • Bin Laden: the man and his life • Consequences of his death • 2 observations: • Continuity with the ‘war on terror’ • Internal discontinuity in recounting of this event. • Gradual ‘forgetting’ of bin Laden and his death. • 1 argument: • Both contributed to this killing’s legitimisation. • Implications of forgetting for (liberal) violence?

  3. Aims and methodology • 2 literatures: • (i) Discursive and/or performative productions of (counter-) terrorism • (ii) Social and narrative memory (and forgetting) • Attempted contributions: • Empirical: bin Laden’s killing is as yet under-explored • Conjunctural: war on terror’s longevity • Conceptual: legitimisation of violences via memory & forgetting • Methodology: • Emphasis on White House, DoD, intelligence community • Bin Laden’s death (May 2011) to 2012 State of Union • Incorporates 9/11’s tenth anniversary.

  4. 1) Killing bin Laden (successfully) • ‘Dead’, ‘deceased’, ‘eliminated’ • ‘…killed by US bullets’ (Senior Defense and Intelligence Officials, 2 May 2011). • ‘Removed’, ‘got’, ‘gone’, and ‘lost’ • “…finally where he belongs” (Gates, 27 May 2011). • The mission’s success: • Heroism: • “…a small group of brave men, dropped by helicopter, half a world away in the dead of night” (M. Obama, 7 May 2011). • Professionalism: • “…the entire world saw the precision and skill of our military” (Panetta, 8 August). • Determined: • “The number one priority was to get Osama bin Laden” (Biden, 6 May 2011).

  5. 1) Killing bin Laden (legitimately) • Justice • “Justice has been done” (Obama 2 May 2011). • Precision: • Minimising of “collateral damage” (Brennan, 2 May 2011). • Global support: • “Americans and people around the world are glad he’s gone” (Carney, 4 May). • Also, treatment of bin Laden’s body: • “…the respect that was shown to him and his body was far greater than the respect that Osama bin Laden showed to the victims on 9/11 or any of his other victims” (Carney, 4 May 2011). • Legality: • Far sparser: ‘laws of war’, and imminence of al Qaeda’s threat. • Obama “…had the right and the imperative to do this” (Carney, 9 May 2011).

  6. 2) Obituarising bin Laden • An active terrorist: • “…the most infamous terrorist of our time” (Obama et al 20 May 2011). • “…bin Laden remained an active leader in al Qaeda, providing strategic, operational and tactical instructions to the group” (Senior Intelligence Official, 7 May 2011). • Of contingent connection to Islam: • “…a mass murderer of Muslims” (Obama 2 May 2011).

  7. 2) Obituarising bin Laden • Further discrediting… • Cowardly: • “…living in an area that is far removed from the front, hiding behind women who were put in front of him as a shield” (Brennan 2 May 2011). • Cosseted: • “living, relatively speaking, high on the hog” (Senior Defence Official, 2 May 2011). • Narcissistic: • “…you can see that his beard has been dyed black…He jealously guarded his image” (Senior Intelligence Official, 7 May 2011). • Anachronistic: • “…he was a relic of the past, in many ways… a representation of everything they don’t want” (Carney, 3 May 2011).

  8. 3) After bin Laden • Bin Laden’s death as a: • “monumental event” (Carney 4 May 2011); “extraordinary event” (Biden 2 May 2011). • Four consequences posited: • 1: Impact on al Qaeda: • “the most significant victory yet in our war to defeat al Qaeda” (Obama, 2 May 2011). • Decapitating, “the head of the snake” (Brennan 2 May 2011). • Should “…send a signal to every member of al Qaeda and every affiliate” (Senior Defense Official, 2 May 2011). • “al Qaeda, bin Laden – old news” (Brennan 2 May 2011).

  9. 3) After bin Laden • 2: (Inter)national security • “bin Laden will never again threaten the United States of America” (Obama, 18 May 2011). • “…the world is a safer place today, not only for the American people, but for all people” (Biden, 4 May 2011). • 3: US/Pakistani relations: • “…it’s a relationship we just have to keep working at” (Gates, 24 May 2011). • 4: For America(ns): • “…a historic week in the life of our nation” (Obama 6 May 2011). • “…a reminder of what we’re about as a people” (ibid). • “a moment long in coming, for the 9/11 families, for this city, and for our nation” (Lynne 11 May 2011).

  10. Remembering (and) the war on terror

  11. Forgetting [and] bin Laden’s death • On forgetting: • Forgetting, frequently, forgotten in memory research: methodological and normative reasons. • Yet, growing literature on types, stimuli and impacts of forgetting. • Bin Laden’s death: • Forgetting via covert and overt silences (Vinitzky-Seroussi & Tegger 2010). • Explanations and implications? • WoT’s earlier departure from bin Laden as yardstick. • Nation-building: a space to revisit 9/11. • Events: Arab spring, withdrawal from Afghanistan, and ‘business as usual’. • Legitimacy to his killing.

  12. Conclusion • Explorations of terrorism and discourse: • (Re)writing of bin Laden, his death, and its significance in the aftermath of these events. • Continuity of war on terror discourse. • Explorations of memory and forgetting: • Gradual de-emphasising of bin Laden’s centrality to this story, and of the facts of his killing.

  13. Thank you for your time

More Related